Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general - 'Information on unpublished decisions' section)
Subject-matter
Partial annulment of Commission Decision C(2006) 4090 final of 13 September 2006 relating to a proceeding under Article 81 EC (Case COMP/F/38.456 – Bitumen – Netherlands) concerning agreements fixing the gross price of road bitumen in the Netherlands and establishing a uniform minimum rebate for road construction companies belonging to the cartel and a lower maximum rebate for other road construction companies
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.01 Agreements, decisions and concerted practices
4.08.01.07 null
4.08.01.07.02 null
4.08.01.07.02.03
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.01 Agreements, decisions and concerted practices
4.08.01.07 null
4.08.01.07.02 null
4.08.01.07.02.03
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.01 Agreements, decisions and concerted practices
4.08.01.07 null
4.08.01.07.02 null
4.08.01.07.02.04 null
4.08.01.07.02.04.04
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.01 Agreements, decisions and concerted practices
4.08.01.07 null
4.08.01.07.02 null
4.08.01.07.02.03
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.01 Agreements, decisions and concerted practices
4.08.01.07 null
4.08.01.07.02 null
4.08.01.07.02.04 null
4.08.01.07.02.04.03
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.01 Agreements, decisions and concerted practices
4.08.01.07 null
4.08.01.07.02 null
4.08.01.07.02.03
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.01 Agreements, decisions and concerted practices
4.08.01.07 null
4.08.01.07.02 null
4.08.01.07.02.03
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.08 Competition
4.08.01 Agreements, decisions and concerted practices
4.08.01.07 null
4.08.01.07.02 null
4.08.01.07.02.01
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 81
: paragraphs 29, 31, 40, 42, 55
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 82
: paragraph 31
-
Regulation 1/2003
-A02 : paragraph 40
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -49/92
: paragraph 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -279/98
: paragraph 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -286/98
: paragraphs 33 - 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -294/98
: paragraph 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -204/00
: paragraphs 29, 41
-
General Court - Judgment T -203/01
: paragraph 31
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -189/02
: paragraph 30
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -217/05
: paragraph 29
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/06
: paragraph 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -97/08
: paragraphs 30 - 35, 45, 47, 53
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -90/09
: paragraphs 34, 45, 53
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09
: paragraph 42
Operative part
Information not available
Opinion
Information not available
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Information not available
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
27/09/2012
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Application: OJ C 20 from 27.01.2007, p.24
Judgment: OJ C 355 from 17.11.2012, p.17
Name of the parties
Koninklijke Volker Wessels Stevin v Commission
Notes on Academic Writings
- Idot, Laurence: Cartels et « double entente horizontale », Europe 2012 Novembre Comm. nº 11 p.36-38 (FR)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Information not available
Subject-matter
- Competition
- - Agreements, decisions and concerted practices
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds
Formation of the Court
sixième chambre (Tribunal)
Judge-Rapporteur
Soldevila Fragoso
Advocate General
Information not available
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion
Information not available