Reports of Cases
2008 I-02439
Subject-matter
Preliminary ruling – Hoge Raad der Nederlanden – Interpretation of Article 3(1)(b) and (c) of First Council Directive 89/104/EEC of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks (OJ 1989 L 40, p. 1) – Non-registration or invalidity – Lack of distinctive character – Acquisition through usage – General interest in not restricting unduly the availability of signs perceived by the relevant public as signs serving to embellish a product and not to distinguish it
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
B European Community (EEC/EC)
B-11 Approximation of laws
B-11.07 Harmonisation of trade mark law
B-11.07.03 Effects of a mark
|
|
|
B European Community (EEC/EC)
B-11 Approximation of laws
B-11.07 Harmonisation of trade mark law
B-11.07.03 Effects of a mark
|
|
|
B European Community (EEC/EC)
B-11 Approximation of laws
B-11.07 Harmonisation of trade mark law
B-11.07.03 Effects of a mark
|
|
|
B European Community (EEC/EC)
B-11 Approximation of laws
B-11.07 Harmonisation of trade mark law
B-11.07.03 Effects of a mark
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
Directive 89/104
: paragraph 1
-
Directive 89/104
-A03 : paragraphs 23, 25, 26
-
Directive 89/104
-A03P1 : paragraph 3
-
Directive 89/104
-A03P1LB : paragraphs 19, 21
-
Directive 89/104
-A03P1LC : paragraphs 19, 21
-
Directive 89/104
-A03P3 : paragraph 4
-
Directive 89/104
-A05 : paragraphs 26, 27
-
Directive 89/104
-A05P1 : paragraphs 5, 38
-
Directive 89/104
-A05P1LB : paragraphs 30 - 34
-
Directive 89/104
-A05P2 : paragraphs 5, 37, 38, 40, 41
-
Directive 89/104
-A06 : paragraph 45
-
Directive 89/104
-A06P1 : paragraph 6
-
Directive 89/104
-A06P1LB : paragraphs 26, 44, 46, 47, 50
-
Directive 89/104
-A12 : paragraphs 25, 26
-
Directive 89/104
-A12P2 : paragraph 7
-
Directive 89/104
-A12P2LA : paragraph 24
-
Directive 89/104
-C10 : paragraphs 29, 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -251/95
: paragraph 29
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -108/97
: paragraph 23
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -342/97
: paragraph 28
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -425/98
: paragraphs 29, 40
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -292/00
: paragraphs 37, 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -53/01
: paragraph 23
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -104/01
: paragraph 23
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -408/01
: paragraphs 37, 40 - 42
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -228/03
: paragraph 45
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -120/04
: paragraphs 28, 29
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -145/05
: paragraphs 24, 27
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -48/05
: paragraph 47
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -102/07
-N33 : paragraphs 22, 46
Operative part
Opinion
-
Directive 89/104
: point 5
-
Directive 89/104
-A02 : point 6
-
Directive 89/104
-A03 : points 61, 66, 68, 73
-
Directive 89/104
-A03P1 : points 7, 49, 55, 71
-
Directive 89/104
-A03P1LB : points 24, 28, 30, 44, 50, 52 - 53, 57, 80
-
Directive 89/104
-A03P1LC : points 24, 28 - 30, 41, 43 - 44, 72 - 74, 80, 85
-
Directive 89/104
-A03P1LD : point 28
-
Directive 89/104
-A03P1LE : point 44
-
Directive 89/104
-A03P3 : points 8, 52, 56
-
Directive 89/104
-A05 : points 27, 46 - 48, 73, 75 - 76, 84
-
Directive 89/104
-A05P1 : point 9
-
Directive 89/104
-A05P2 : point 9
-
Directive 89/104
-A06 : points 27, 45, 47 - 48, 50, 66 - 69, 75, 79
-
Directive 89/104
-A06P1 : points 30, 47, 49 - 51, 71
-
Directive 89/104
-A06P1LA : points 49, 51
-
Directive 89/104
-A06P1LB : points 29, 51, 57, 61, 63, 65, 72, 74, 76 - 78, 81, 83 - 84
-
Directive 89/104
-A06P1LC : points 51, 73
-
Regulation 40/94
: point 5
-
Regulation 40/94
-A04 : point 5
-
Regulation 40/94
-A07 : points 5, 66
-
Regulation 40/94
-A07P1LB : point 53
-
Regulation 40/94
-A07P1LC : point 55
-
Regulation 40/94
-A07P1LD : point 55
-
Regulation 40/94
-A07P1LE : point 55
-
Regulation 40/94
-A09 : point 5
-
Regulation 40/94
-A12 : points 5, 66
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -10/89
-N13 : point 59
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -63/97
: point 59
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -63/97
-N24 : point 64
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -63/97
-N62 : point 59
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -63/97
-N62 : point 77
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -108/97
: points 32, 41, 44, 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -108/97
-N26 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -108/97
-N27 : point 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -108/97
-N28 : point 61
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -108/97
-N28 : point 77
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -108/97
-N35 : point 42
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -223/98
: point 1
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -425/98
: point 1
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -383/99
-N37 : point 66
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -383/99
-N77 : point 66
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -299/99
-N80 : point 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -363/99
: point 33
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -383/99
: point 66
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -104/00
: point 32
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -456/01
-N48 : point 53
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -456/01
-N78 : point 53
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -53/01
: point 32
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -104/01
-N52 : point 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -104/01
-N57 : points 67, 79
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -104/01
-N58 : point 68
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -104/01
-N59 : point 68
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -218/01
-N40 : point 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -218/01
-N41 : point 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -408/01
: point 1
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -408/01
-N39 : point 82
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/01
: points 32, 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -100/02
-N16 : point 77
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -100/02
-N19 : point 63
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -100/02
-N26 : point 63
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -329/02
-N26 : point 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -329/02
-N27 : point 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -228/03
-N41 : point 64
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -228/03
-N44 : point 64
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -48/05
-N43 : point 62
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -17/06
-N29 : point 49
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
10/04/2008
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Application: OJ C 82 from 14.04.2007, p.26
Judgment: OJ C 128 from 24.05.2008, p.13
Name of the parties
Adidas and adidas Benelux
Notes on Academic Writings
- Idot, Laurence: De la disponibilité d'un signe, Europe 2008 Juin Comm. nº 203 p.29-30 (FR)
- Gielen, Charles ; Verschuur, Anne-Marie: Adidas v Marca II: Undue Limitations of Trade Mark Owner's Rights by the European Court of Justice?, European Intellectual Property Review 2008 p.254-258 (EN)
- Lerach, Mark: Zum Freihaltebedürfnis als Kriterium des Schutzumfangs einer Marke im Verletzungsverfahren, European Law Reporter 2008 p.216-220 (DE)
- Casaburi, G.: Il Foro italiano 2008 IV Col.297-301 (IT)
- Lübbig, Thomas ; Pitschas, Christian ; Le Bell, Miriam: EuGH: Urteil zur Reichweite des ausschließlichen Rechts eines Markeninhabers, Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht / Revue suisse de droit des affaires / Swiss Review of Business Law 2008 p.331-332 (DE)
- Gielen, Ch.: Intellectuele eigendom & Reclamerecht 2008 p.211 (NL)
- Grigoriadis, L.: Elliniki Epitheorisi Evropaïkou Dikaiou 2008 p.545-551 (EL)
- Clayton-Chen, Jennifer: Freihaltebedürfnis und Kennzeichnungskraft von Marken im Rahmen der Verwechslungsgefahr, Markenrecht 2008 p.476-481 (DE)
- Salom, Gaia: L'interesse generale alla libera disponibilità dei segni nella giurisprudenza comunitaria, Rivista di diritto industriale 2008 II p.536-543 (IT)
- Gielen, Ch.: Nederlandse jurisprudentie ; Uitspraken in burgerlijke en strafzaken 2010 nº 436 (NL)
- Anemaet, Lotte: The many faces of the average consumer: is it really so difficult to assess whether two stripes are similar to three?, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 2020 p. 187-213 (EN)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Hoge Raad der Nederlanden - Netherlands
Subject-matter
- Approximation of laws
- Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
Formation of the Court
première chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Ilešič
Advocate General
Ruiz-Jarabo Colomer
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion