Reports of Cases
1988 05565
Swedish IX/00729 Finnish IX/00749
Subject-matter
Information not available
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
E Convention on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments
E-06 Special jurisdiction in case of related proceedings
E-06.01 Number of defendants
|
|
|
E-05.03 Jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict
|
|
|
E Convention on jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments
E-05 Special jurisdiction
E-05.03 Jurisdiction in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
Operative part
Opinion
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
27/09/1988
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Application: OJ C 188 from 17.07.1987, p.9
Judgment: OJ C 281 from 04.11.1988, p.18
Name of the parties
Kalfelis v Schröder and Others
Notes on Academic Writings
- Schlosser, Peter: EuGÜbk: Zuständigkeit bei mehreren Beklagten an verschiedenen Wohnsitzen - Begriff der unerlaubten Handlung, Recht der internationalen Wirtschaft 1988 p.987-989 (DE)
- Geimer, Reinhold: Streitgenossenzuständigkeit und forum delicti commissi, Neue juristische Wochenschrift 1988 p.3089-3090 (DE)
- Huet, André: Chronique de jurisprudence de la Cour de justice des Communautés européennes. Convention de Bruxelles du 27 septembre 1968, Journal du droit international 1989 p.457-461 (FR)
- Gill, A.V.: Multiple Defendants, Jurisdiction in Tort and the Brussels Convention, Irish Law Times and Solicitors' Journal 1989 p.2-4 (EN)
- Ekelmans, Marc: Journal des tribunaux 1989 p.215-216 (FR)
- Gaudemet-Tallon, H.: Communautés européennes, Revue critique de droit international privé 1989 p.117-123 (FR)
- Jiménez Fortea, Francisco Javier: Comentario a la sentencia del Tribunal de Justicia de las Comunidades Europeas de 27 de septiembre de 1988 (artículos 5 y 6 del Convenio de Bruselas), Revista General de Derecho 1989 p.3939-3955 (ES)
- Hartley, Trevor: Jurisdictional Issues under Articles 5(1), 5(3) and 6(1), European Law Review 1989 p.172-175 (EN)
- Audit, Bernard: Droit international privé, Recueil Dalloz Sirey 1989 Som. p.254-255 (FR)
- Vlas, P.: TVVS ondernemingsrecht en rechtspersonen 1989 p.181-182 (NL)
- Gottwald, Peter: Europäische Gerichtspflichtigkeit kraft Sachzusammenhangs, Praxis des internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts 1989 p.272-274 (DE)
- Borrás Rodríguez, Alegría: Jurisprudencia del Tribunal de Justicia de las Comunidades Europeas, Revista Jurídica de Catalunya 1989 p.538-540 (ES)
- Schultsz, J.C.: Nederlandse jurisprudentie ; Uitspraken in burgerlijke en strafzaken 1990 nº 425 (NL)
- Tagaras, H.: Cahiers de droit européen 1990 p.667-670 (FR)
- Makridou, Kalliopi Th.: Ermineftika zitimata tis dosidikias tis "adikopraxias" kai "oionei adikopraxias" tou arthrou 5 § 3 tis Symvaseos ton Vryxellon (Me aformi tin apofasi tou DEvrK stin ypothesi Kalfelis/Schröder), Armenopoulos 1990 p.1165-1172 (EL)
- Anton, A.E. ; Beaumont, P.R.: The Scots Law Times 1991 p.a4 (EN)
- Ullmann, Eike: Die Verwarnung aus Schutzrechten - mehr als eine Meinungsäußerung?, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht 2001 p.1027-1032 (DE)
- Ebbink, Richard: A Fire-Side Chat On Cross-Border Issues (before the ECJ in GAT v. LuK), Festschrift für Jochen Pagenberg 2006 p.255-262 (EN)
- Reydellet, Colin: Leçon 2 : De la matière délictuelle et de sa qualification....., Revue Lamy droit des affaires 2016 nº 111 p.33-36 (FR)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Bundesgerichtshof - Germany
Subject-matter
- Brussels Convention of 27 September 1968
- - Brussels Convention of 27 September 1968 - Jurisdiction
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
Formation of the Court
cinquième chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Galmot
Advocate General
Darmon
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion