Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general - 'Information on unpublished decisions' section)
Subject-matter
Annulment of Commission Decision C(2012) 8761 final of 5 December 2012 declaring compatible with the internal market the State aid granted by Germany to the Deutscher Alpenverein eV for the construction and operation of climbing centres (State aid SA.33952 (2012/NN) – Germany) (OJ 2013 C 21, p. 1)
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
3.02.03.02 Acts which are of individual concern to them
|
1.
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.02 Actions for annulment
3.02.03 Applications by natural or legal persons
3.02.03.02 Acts which are of individual concern to them
|
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.08 Procedural rules
3.08.02 Intervention
|
|
|
3 Legal proceedings
3.02 Actions for annulment
3.02.00 General
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.09 State aid
4.09.03 Exceptions to the prohibition of aid
4.09.03.04 Commission discretion
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.09 State aid
4.09.03 Exceptions to the prohibition of aid
4.09.03.04 Commission discretion
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.09 State aid
4.09.03 Exceptions to the prohibition of aid
4.09.03.02 Aid that may be considered to be compatible with the internal market (Article 107(3) TFEU)
4.09.03.02.00 General
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.09 State aid
4.09.03 Exceptions to the prohibition of aid
4.09.03.00 General
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.09 State aid
4.09.04 Procedure for reviewing aid
4.09.04.00 General
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.09 State aid
4.09.03 Exceptions to the prohibition of aid
4.09.03.02 Aid that may be considered to be compatible with the internal market (Article 107(3) TFEU)
4.09.03.02.00 General
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.09 State aid
4.09.03 Exceptions to the prohibition of aid
4.09.03.02 Aid that may be considered to be compatible with the internal market (Article 107(3) TFEU)
4.09.03.02.00 General
|
|
|
1.01.02.01 Principle of equality and non-discrimination
|
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.01 Sources of EU law
1.01.02 General principles of law
1.01.02.01 Principle of equality and non-discrimination
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.09 State aid
4.09.04 Procedure for reviewing aid
4.09.04.04 Preliminary review
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.09 State aid
4.09.04 Procedure for reviewing aid
4.09.04.05 Commission decision following a preliminary review or proceeding to the formal investigation procedure
4.09.04.05.03 Decision to initiate a formal investigation procedure
4.09.04.05.03.01 Obligation to initiate the formal investigation procedure
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 87
-P3 : paragraph 44
-
TFEU, Article 107
-P3 : paragraph 50
-
TFEU, Article 107
-P3LC : paragraphs 42, 49, 77, 80, 90, 142
-
TFEU, Article 108
: paragraphs 131, 133
-
TFEU, Article 108
-P2 : paragraphs 33 - 36, 42, 125, 130, 132 - 134, 145
-
TFEU, Article 108
-P3 : paragraphs 33, 34, 133 - 135, 145
-
TFEU, Article 165
: paragraph 79
-
TFEU, Article 263
-L4 : paragraphs 31, 35
-
TFEU - Protocol No 3
-A04L4 : paragraph 38
-
Regulation 659/1999
: paragraph 144
-
Regulation 659/1999
-A01LD : paragraph 63
-
Regulation 659/1999
-A04P4 : paragraphs 42, 125, 130
-
Regulation 659/1999
-A04P5 : paragraph 143
-
Regulation 659/1999
-A13P1 : paragraph 130
-
Regulation 800/2008
: paragraph 44
-
Secondary Legislation - Internal Act of the Institutions - 32015Q0423(01)
-A116P3 : paragraph 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -25/62
: paragraphs 32, 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -248/84
-N18 : paragraph 67
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -313/90
-N31 : paragraph 41
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -324/90
-N14 : paragraph 65
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -198/91
-N22 : paragraph 133
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -198/91
-N29 : paragraph 134
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -225/91
-N11 : paragraph 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -225/91
-N12 : paragraph 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -225/91
-N13 : paragraph 38
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -225/91
-N16 : paragraph 133
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -225/91
-N33 : paragraph 134
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -225/91
-N37 : paragraph 139
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -367/95
-N60 : paragraph 121
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -367/95
-N62 : paragraph 121
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -204/97
-N29 : paragraph 131
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -204/97
-N30 : paragraph 132
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -204/97
-N32 : paragraph 133
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -204/97
-N33 : paragraph 134
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -204/97
-N34 : paragraph 135
-
General Court - Judgment T -46/97
-N102 : paragraph 145
-
General Court - Judgment T -46/97
-N89 : paragraph 141
-
General Court - Judgment T -73/98
-N47 : paragraph 136
-
General Court - Judgment T -73/98
-N94 : paragraph 146
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -113/00
-N69 : paragraph 116
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -113/00
-N70 : paragraph 116
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -113/00
-N71 : paragraph 116
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/00
: paragraph 100
-
General Court - Judgment T -254/00
-N227 : paragraphs 62, 140
-
General Court - Judgment T -254/00
-N229 : paragraphs 67, 94, 112
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -78/03
-N34 : paragraph 33
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -78/03
-N35 : paragraph 34
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -78/03
-N36 : paragraph 35
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -78/03
-N37 : paragraph 36
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -397/03
-N91 : paragraph 54
-
General Court - Judgment T -95/03
-N135 : paragraph 145
-
General Court - Judgment T -388/03
-N103 : paragraph 141
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -525/04
-N56 : paragraph 51
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -525/04
-N57 : paragraph 51
-
General Court - Judgment T -167/04
-N86 : paragraph 144
-
General Court - Judgment T -167/04
-N89 : paragraph 149
-
General Court - Judgment T -167/04
-N90 : paragraph 149
-
General Court - Judgment T -8/06
-N77 : paragraph 52
-
General Court - Judgment T -8/06
-N78 : paragraphs 52, 82
-
General Court - Judgment T -21/06
: paragraph 77
-
General Court - Judgment T -21/06
-N50 : paragraph 50
-
General Court - Judgment T -21/06
-N51 : paragraph 53
-
General Court - Judgment T -21/06
-N58 : paragraph 78
-
General Court - Judgment T -282/06
-N50 : paragraph 41
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -431/07
-N220 : paragraph 149
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -431/07
-N65 : paragraph 139
-
General Court - Judgment T -579/08
-N41 : paragraph 116
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -71/09
-N63 : paragraph 67
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -138/09
-N21 : paragraph 59
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -544/09
: paragraph 60
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -459/10
: paragraph 60
-
Court of Justice - Order C -200/11
-N74 : paragraph 119
-
General Court - Judgment T -308/11
-N86 : paragraph 116
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -129/12
: paragraph 60
Operative part
Information not available
Opinion
Information not available
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Information not available
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
09/06/2016
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Judgment: OJ C 270 from 25.07.2016, p.37
Application: OJ C 147 from 25.05.2013, p.25
Name of the parties
Magic Mountain Kletterhallen and Others v Commission
Notes on Academic Writings
- Stromsky, Bruno: Régime d'aides - Analyse économique plus fine - Nécessité - Proportionnalité : Le Tribunal de l'Union européenne estime que la Commission européenne n'est pas tenue de conduire une analyse économique fine pour déclarer compatible avec le marché intérieur un régime d'aides aux centres d'escalade amateurs, Concurrences : revue des droits de la concurrence 2016 nº 3 p.135-137 (FR)
- Idot, Laurence: La promotion du sport est un objectif d'intérêt commun, qui peut justifier l'octroi d'aides d'État, Europe 2016 Septembre Comm. nº 8-9 p.41-42 (FR)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Information not available
Subject-matter
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds
Formation of the Court
sixième chambre (Tribunal)
Judge-Rapporteur
Collins
Advocate General
Information not available
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion
Information not available