Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• TFEU, Article 101 : paragraph 4
• TFEU, Article 102 : paragraphs 1, 4, 16, 17, 19, 37 - 40, 42, 44, 47, 55, 56, 58 - 60
• TFEU, Article 267 : paragraph 35
• TFEU, Article 288 -L3 : paragraph 23
• 3192014L0104 -A21P1 : paragraph 1
• 3192014L0104 -A22 : paragraph 1
• Regulation 1/2003 -A03P1 : paragraph 4
• Directive 2014/104 : paragraphs 11, 22, 23, 25, 29, 31
• Directive 2014/104 -A01P1 : paragraph 3
• Directive 2014/104 -A02 : paragraph 4
• Directive 2014/104 -A09P1 : paragraphs 1, 5, 23
• Directive 2014/104 -A10 : paragraph 23
• Directive 2014/104 -A10P2 : paragraphs 1, 6, 23
• Directive 2014/104 -A10P3 : paragraphs 1, 6, 23
• Directive 2014/104 -A10P4 : paragraphs 1, 6, 23
• Directive 2014/104 -A21 : paragraphs 8, 26, 30, 33
• Directive 2014/104 -A21P1 : paragraphs 7, 8, 23
• Directive 2014/104 -A22 : paragraphs 8, 23, 24, 34
• Directive 2014/104 -A22P1 : paragraphs 26, 30, 33
• Directive 2014/104 -A22P2 : paragraphs 27, 28
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N20 : paragraph 38
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N21 : paragraph 39
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N22 : paragraph 40
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N23 : paragraph 41
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N24 : paragraph 42
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N25 : paragraph 43
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N26 : paragraph 44
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -74/16 -N36 : paragraph 35
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -334/16 -N38 : paragraph 57

Operative part

• Interprets : TFEU, Article 102
• Interprets : Directive 2014/104 -A22

Opinion

• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 81 : point 74
  
• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 82 : point 47
  
• TFEU, Article 101 : points 51, 57, 58, 62, 74, 89
  
• TFEU, Article 102 : points 5, 8, 23, 24, 32, 35, 38 - 42, 45 - 51, 53, 57 - 59, 62, 65, 66, 71, 74, 80, 86, 89, 95, 97, 102, 106, 107
  
• TFEU, Article 267 : point 30
  
• TFEU, Article 288 -L3 : point 30
  
• TEU, Article 4 -P3 : point 29
  
• Regulation 1/2003 : points 1, 7
  
• Regulation 1/2003 -A03P1 : points 8, 11
  
• Regulation 1/2003 -A05 : points 9, 50 - 52
  
• Regulation 1/2003 -A06 : points 51, 52
  
• Regulation 1/2003 -A16P1 : point 96
  
• Directive 2014/14 -A02 : point 11
  
• Directive 2014/14 -A02PT1 : point 11
  
• Directive 2014/14 -A10 : point 13
  
• Directive 2014/104 : points 2, 4, 5, 7, 29, 32, 35, 46, 52, 54, 58, 59, 65 - 67, 69, 71, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 100 - 102, 106, 107
  
• Directive 2014/104 -A01 : points 10, 55
  
• Directive 2014/104 -A01P1 : points 56, 58
  
• Directive 2014/104 -A02 : point 55
  
• Directive 2014/104 -A02PT1 : points 57, 58
  
• Directive 2014/104 -A02PT3 : points 57, 58
  
• Directive 2014/104 -A09 : points 36, 45, 64, 96, 107
  
• Directive 2014/104 -A09P1 : points 12, 30, 42, 61, 95
  
• Directive 2014/104 -A10 : points 36, 45, 61, 63, 64, 73, 107
  
• Directive 2014/104 -A10P2 : point 30
  
• Directive 2014/104 -A10P3 : points 30, 79, 80
  
• Directive 2014/104 -A10P4 : point 30
  
• Directive 2014/104 -A21 : point 15
  
• Directive 2014/104 -A21P1 : points 14, 15, 30
  
• Directive 2014/104 -A22 : points 15, 30, 45
  
• Directive 2014/104 -A22P1 : points 60, 64, 101
  
• Directive 2014/104 -A22P2 : points 36, 37, 63, 64, 101
  
• Directive 2014/104 -A23 : point 16
  
• Directive 2014/104 -A24 : point 20
  
• Directive 2014/104 -A25 : point 20
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/73 -N16 : point 66
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/74 -N12 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -8/81 -N25 : point 68
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -152/84 -N48 : point 68
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -157/86 -N11 : point 99
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -91/92 -N20 : point 68
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -91/92 -N26 : point 99
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -316/93 -N16 : point 64
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -316/93 -N17 : point 64
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -316/93 -N18 : point 64
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -282/95 -N39 : point 66
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -129/96 -N45 : point 101
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -355/97 -N22 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -287/98 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -344/98 : point 96
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -453/99 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -453/99 -N23 : point 66
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -397/01 -N111 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -397/01 -N113 : point 99
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -387/02 -N109 : point 81
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -144/04 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/04 -N110 : point 105
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/04 -N122 : point 101
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/04 -N123 : point 101
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N39 : point 66
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N40 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N41 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N42 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N60 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N61 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N62 : points 75, 77, 90
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N64 : points 75, 90
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N78 : point 81
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N79 : point 81
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N80 : point 81
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N81 : point 81
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N82 : point 81
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N89 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -208/05 -N68 : point 99
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -268/06 -N101 : point 99
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -268/06 -N98 : point 99
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -375/09 -N32 : point 51
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -360/09 -N19 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -375/09 : points 40, 50
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -282/10 -N33 : point 68
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -536/11 -N21 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -536/11 -N25 : points 75, 90
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -536/11 -N26 : points 75, 90
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -536/11 -N27 : points 75, 77, 90
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N20 : point 66
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N21 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N22 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N23 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N24 : points 75, 90
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N25 : point 77
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/14 -N29 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/14 -N32 : point 105
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/15 -N32 : point 101
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -187/15 -N43 : point 99
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -179/16 -N45 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -426/16 -N31 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -439/16 -N31 : point 101
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -439/16 -N32 : point 101
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -528/16 -N73 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -585/16 -N98 : point 68
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -42/17 -N44 : point 63
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -42/17 -N45 : point 63
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/17 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/17 -N34 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/17 -N37 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/17 -N39 : point 99
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/17 -N40 : point 105
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/17 -N42 : point 68
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -167/17 -N39 : point 101
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 15/11/2017

Date of the Opinion

• 17/01/2019

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

28/03/2019

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 187 from 03.06.2019, p.21

Application: OJ C 32 from 29.01.2018, p.14

Name of the parties

Cogeco Communications

Notes on Academic Writings

1. v. Graevenitz, Albrecht: Wettbewerbsrecht: Verjährung kartellrechtlicher Schadensersatzansprüche, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2019 p.332-337 (DE)
2. Drijber, Berend Jan: Private handhaving en het weerbarstige leerstuk van verjaring, Markt & Mededinging 2019 p.120-124 (NL)
3. De Bandt, Pierre ; Binet, Chloé: Arrêt "Cogeco": le droit primaire au secours du demandeur de dommages et intérêts pour une infraction au droit de la concurrence, Journal de droit européen 2019 nº260 p.249-251 (FR)
4. Holzwarth, Johannes: Verjährung à la Cogeco, Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb 2019 N°7/8 p.342-347 (DE)
5. van Wamel, David: Shining a Light on the Interface between EU and National Law in the Private Enforcement of the EU Competition Rules, European competition and regulatory law review: CoRe 2019 Vol.3 N°3 p.327-333 (EN)
6. Chagny, Muriel: De l'application dans le temps de la Directive Dommages et de la prescription des actions indemnitaires, Revue de jurisprudence commerciale 2019 p.352-354 (FR)
7. Klöpfer, Matthias: Anmerkung zu EuGH, Urt. v. 28.3.2019 - C-637/17 - Cogeco Communications Inc, Zeitschrift für das Privatrecht der Europäischen Union - GPR 2019 p.293-296 (DE)
8. Idot, Laurence: Concurrence - Actions en réparation et prescription, Europe 2019, n° 5 Mai, Comm. 207 (FR)
9. Strand, Magnus: Competition damages betwixt and between past and future: Cogeco, Common Market Law Review 2020, n° 2, p. 569-590 (EN)
10. Parmentier, Hugues: Actions indemnitaires : l’harmonisation prétorienne pour compléter la directive dommages, Revue Lamy de la Concurrence 2020, nº 101, p. 41-47 (FR)
11. Dinev, Anton: Absolute limitation periods and decentralised enforcement of articles 101 and 102 TFEU : what about Regulation 1/2003's effectiveness requirement? : Consiliul Concurentei v Whiteland Import Export SRL (C-308/19), Cogeco Communications Inc v Sport TV Portugal SA (C-637/17), (VEBIC) VZW v Raad voor de Mededinging (C-439/08), European Competition Law Review 2022 p. 13-27 (EN)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Lisboa - Portugal

Subject-matter

• Competition
  
• Approximation of laws
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  
• Reference for a preliminary ruling : case not proceeding to judgment
  

Formation of the Court

deuxième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Arabadjiev

Advocate General

Kokott

Language(s) of the Case

• Portuguese
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• German