Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 22 December 2017

Samet Ardic

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Surrender procedures between Member States — Conditions for execution — Grounds for optional non-execution — Article 4a(1) of Framework Decision 2009/299/JHA — Arrest warrant issued for the purpose of executing a custodial sentence — ‘Trial resulting in the decision’ — Scope — Person sentenced to a custodial sentence in final proceedings conducted in his presence — Execution of sentence subsequently suspended in part subject to certain conditions — Subsequent proceedings leading to revocation of the suspension due to non-compliance with those conditions — Revocation proceedings conducted in the absence of the person concerned

Case C-571/17 PPU


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Autres Liens
Judgment (OJ)
09/02/2018 Ardic
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2017:1026
22/12/2017 Ardic
Judgment (Summary)
ECLI:EU:C:2017:1026
22/12/2017 Ardic
Application (OJ)
10/11/2017 Ardic
Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:2017:1013
20/12/2017 Ardic
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.03 Judicial cooperation in criminal matters
      4.06.03.01 Harmonization of laws
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.03 Judicial cooperation in criminal matters
      4.06.03.01 Harmonization of laws
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.03 Judicial cooperation in criminal matters
      4.06.03.01 Harmonization of laws


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Opinion


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 28/09/2017

Date of the Opinion

  • 20/12/2017

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

22/12/2017


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 72 from 26.02.2018, p.27

Application: OJ C 402 from 27.11.2017, p.18

Name of the parties

Ardic

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Meyer, Frank: Europäischer Haftbefehl nach Bewährungswiderruf in Abwesenheit des Betroffenen, Neue juristische Wochenschrift 2018 p.927 (DE)
  2. Gazin, Fabienne: Mandat d'arrêt européen - Motif facultatif de non-exécution d'un mandat d'arrêt européen, Europe 2018, Février nº 2, Comm. 58 (FR)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Rechtbank Amsterdam - Netherlands

Subject-matter

  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - judicial cooperation in criminal matters
  • - police cooperation

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Preliminary reference - urgent procedure

Formation of the Court

cinquième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Biltgen

Advocate General

Bobek

Language(s) of the Case

  • Dutch

Language(s) of the Opinion

  • French