Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)
Subject-matter
Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 10 October 2012 in Case T569/10 Bimbo SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM) whereby the General Court dismissed an action for annulment brought by the applicant for the word mark ‘BIMBO DOUGHNUTS’ for goods in Class 30 against the decision R 838/20094 of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) of 7 October 2010 dismissing the action against the decision of the Opposition Division refusing registration of that mark in opposition proceedings brought by the proprietor of the international and national word marks ‘DONUT’, ‘DOGHNUTS’ and ‘DONUTS’ and the international and national figurative marks containing the word ‘donuts’ for goods in Class 30 Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 – Likelihood of confusion
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.11 Approximation of laws
4.11.03 European Union trade mark
4.11.03.02 Relative grounds for refusal
4.11.03.02.02 Likelihood of confusion with an earlier mark
4.11.03.02.02.00 General
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.11 Approximation of laws
4.11.03 European Union trade mark
4.11.03.02 Relative grounds for refusal
4.11.03.02.02 Likelihood of confusion with an earlier mark
4.11.03.02.02.03 Similarity between marks
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.11 Approximation of laws
4.11.03 European Union trade mark
4.11.03.02 Relative grounds for refusal
4.11.03.02.02 Likelihood of confusion with an earlier mark
4.11.03.02.02.00 General
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
Operative part
Opinion
-
Directive 89/104
-A05P1LB : points 13, 14
-
Regulation 207/2009
-A08P1LB : points 8, 13
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -251/95
: points 14, 25, 26
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -342/97
: points 14, 25
-
General Court - Judgment T -6/01
: points 17, 24
-
Court of Justice - Order C -3/03
: points 14, 17, 24
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -120/04
: points 22, 24, 40, 44
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -120/04
: points 13 - 31, 36, 40, 44
-
General Court - Judgment T -491/04
: points 17, 18
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -334/05
: point 24
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -334/05
: points 17, 24
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -434/05
: points 19, 20
-
Court of Justice - Order C -235/05
: point 19
-
General Court - Judgment T -43/05
: point 21
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -193/06
: points 17 - 20, 24
-
General Court - Judgment T -99/06
: point 19
-
General Court - Judgment T -109/07
: points 18, 26
-
General Court - Judgment T -212/07
: point 18
-
General Court - Judgment T -305/07
: points 18, 19
-
General Court - Judgment T -366/07
: point 18
-
General Court - Judgment T -460/07
: point 18
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/08
: point 19
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -202/08
: point 17
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -210/08
: point 17
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -579/08
: point 17
-
General Court - Judgment T -5/08
: point 18
-
General Court - Judgment T -16/08
: point 19
-
General Court - Judgment T -243/08
: point 19
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -51/09
: point 18
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -51/09
: point 26
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -254/09
: points 17, 24
-
Court of Justice - Order C -23/09
: point 18
-
Court of Justice - Order C -353/09
: points 18, 19
-
General Court - Judgment T -10/09
: point 19
-
General Court - Judgment T -63/09
: points 19, 20, 26
-
General Court - Judgment T -42/09
: point 21
-
General Court - Judgment T -160/09
: point 18
-
General Court - Judgment T -228/09
: point 19
-
General Court - Judgment T -376/09
: points 18 - 20
-
General Court - Judgment T -385/09
: points 20, 26
-
Court of Justice - Order C -204/10
: point 25
-
Court of Justice - Order C -370/10
: point 19
-
Court of Justice - Order C -532/10
: point 25
-
General Court - Judgment T -107/10
: points 18, 19
-
General Court - Judgment T -169/10
: points 18, 19
-
General Court - Judgment T -197/10
: point 20
-
General Court - Judgment T -199/10
: point 20
-
General Court - Judgment T -348/10
: points 18 - 20
-
General Court - Judgment T -569/10
: points 1 - 46
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/11
: points 17, 24
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/11
: point 19
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -327/11
: point 19
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -655/11
: point 17
-
General Court - Judgment T -247/11
: point 18
-
General Court - Judgment T -231/12
: point 18
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
08/05/2014
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Judgment: OJ C 202 from 30.06.2014, p.5
Application: OJ C 55 from 23.02.2013, p.6
Name of the parties
Bimbo v OHIM
Notes on Academic Writings
- Blum, Jeremy ; Pollard, Briony: Bimbo and Composite Trade Marks: A Review of the European Approach to Assessing Confusion, European Intellectual Property Review 2015 p.46-50 (EN)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Information not available
Subject-matter
- Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
- - Trade marks
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Actions for annulment
- Appeals : dismissal on substantive grounds
- Appeals : dismissal on grounds of inadmissibility
Formation of the Court
deuxième chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Arabadjiev
Advocate General
Mengozzi
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion