Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A107 : paragraph 23
• Directive 2016/343 : paragraphs 22, 25, 33, 35, 36
• Directive 2016/343 -A03 : paragraphs 1, 5, 22, 28
• Directive 2016/343 -A06 : paragraphs 1, 6, 22, 28
• Directive 2016/343 -A14P1 : paragraphs 7, 29
• Directive 2016/343 -A15 : paragraphs 8, 29
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -129/96 -N43 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -129/96 -N45 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/04 -N121 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/04 -N122 : paragraph 32
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -138/08 -N25 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/15 -N32 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -237/15 -N24 : paragraph 26
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -294/16 -N29 : paragraph 26

Operative part

• Interprets : Directive 2016/343

Opinion

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007) : points 51, 74, 81
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 6 : point 4
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47 : point 5
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 48 : points 6, 66
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 48 -P1 : points 64, 75, 76
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 48 -P3 : points 64, 73, 75
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52 -P3 : points 64, 73, 75
  
• TFEU, Article 288 : point 37
  
• TEU, Article 4 -P3 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A107 : point 25
  
• Directive 2016/343 : points 3, 24, 28 - 30, 33, 35, 38, 39, 41 - 43, 45 - 49, 53 - 55, 58, 59, 61, 69, 75, 78, 85
  
• Directive 2016/343 -A01LA : point 42
  
• Directive 2016/343 -A02 : point 62
  
• Directive 2016/343 -A03 : points 8, 24, 66, 75, 76, 84
  
• Directive 2016/343 -A04 : points 62, 79, 80, 81, 82, 84
  
• Directive 2016/343 -A04P1 : point 9
  
• Directive 2016/343 -A04P2 : points 9, 83
  
• Directive 2016/343 -A06 : points 10, 24
  
• Directive 2016/343 -A10 : points 11, 83, 84
  
• Directive 2016/343 -A14P1 : point 12
  
• Directive 2016/343 -A15 : points 12, 33
  
• Directive 2016/343 -C12 : point 62
  
• Directive 2016/343 -C16 : points 7, 62, 79, 80
  
• Directive 2016/343 -C22 : point 7
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -297/88 : point 57
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -129/96 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -129/96 -N43 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -129/96 -N45 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -144/04 : point 50
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/04 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/04 -N114 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/04 -N115 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/04 -N119 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/04 -N121 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/04 -N122 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/04 -N123 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -81/05 -N29 : point 51
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -427/06 -N15 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -261/07 -N35 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -261/07 -N36 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -261/07 -N37 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -261/07 -N38 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -261/07 -N39 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -261/07 -N40 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -261/07 -N41 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -138/08 -N25 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -119/09 -N21 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - View C-357/09 -N35 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -43/10 -N108 : point 41
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -2/10 -N69 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -2/10 -N70 : point 51
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10 -N21 : point 51
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -599/12 -N35 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -122/13 -N15 : point 57
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -346/14 -N50 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -281/15 -N28 : point 57
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 05/08/2016

Date of the Opinion

• 11/10/2016

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

27/10/2016

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 6 from 09.01.2017, p.23

Application: OJ C 364 from 03.10.2016, p.12

Name of the parties

Milev

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Berlin, Dominique: Position délicate du juge pénal bulgare, La Semaine Juridique - édition générale 2016 nº 46 p.2086 (FR)
2. Simon, Denys: La Cour précise la portée des obligations pesant sur les États membres pendant le délai de transposition des directives dans un contexte illustrant la complexité de l'incidence du droit de la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme dans l'ordre juridique de l'Union, Europe 2016 Décembre Comm. nº 12 p.18-19 (FR)
3. Simon, Denys: Directives, Europe 2016 Décembre nº 12 p.18-19 (FR)
4. Chifchieva, Miroslava: Reasonable Suspicion or Presumption of Innocence, Европейски правен преглед 2017 nº XVII p.148-165 (BG)
5. Kornezov, Alexander: Ten Years of Preliminary References from Bulgaria - A Critical Appraisal, Европейски правен преглед 2017 nº XVIII p.21-42 (BG)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Spetsializiran nakazatelen sad - Bulgaria

Subject-matter

• area of freedom, security and justice
  
• - judicial cooperation in criminal matters
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Наказателно-процесуален кодекс (Code de procédure pénale), чл. 16, 56, ал. 1, 63. ал. 1 и член 256, ал.1, т.2 и ал.3 във връзка с член 270, ал.2 от НПК

Provisions of international law referred to

Convention européenne de sauvegarde des Droits de l'Homme et des Libertés fondamentales (04/11/1950), article 5, paragraphes 1, lettre c, et 4 (04/11/1950)

Procedure and result

• Preliminary reference - urgent procedure
  

Formation of the Court

quatrième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

von Danwitz

Advocate General

Bobek

Language(s) of the Case

• Bulgarian
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• French