Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)
Subject-matter
Annulment of Commission Decision C (2011) 4483 final of 29 June 2011 declaring to be in part State aid incompatible with the internal market the implicit unlimited State guarantee for the Institut Français du Pétrole (IFP) (French Petroleum Institute) resulting from the IFP’s status as an industrial and commercial public body (EPIC) (State aid No C 35/2008 (ex NN 11/2008)).
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.09 State aid
4.09.01 Definition of aid
4.09.01.03 Advantage conferred on an undertaking
4.09.01.03.00 General
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.09 State aid
4.09.01 Definition of aid
4.09.01.03 Advantage conferred on an undertaking
4.09.01.03.00 General
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.09 State aid
4.09.04 Procedure for reviewing aid
4.09.04.06 Formal investigation procedure
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.09 State aid
4.09.01 Definition of aid
4.09.01.00 General
|
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.05 Legal acts of the European Union
2.05.06 Statement of reasons
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.09 State aid
4.09.01 Definition of aid
4.09.01.03 Advantage conferred on an undertaking
4.09.01.03.00 General
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.09 State aid
4.09.01 Definition of aid
4.09.01.03 Advantage conferred on an undertaking
4.09.01.03.00 General
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.09 State aid
4.09.04 Procedure for reviewing aid
4.09.04.00 General
|
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.09 State aid
4.09.01 Definition of aid
4.09.01.03 Advantage conferred on an undertaking
4.09.01.03.00 General
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
TFEU, Article 107
-P1 : paragraphs 61, 69, 71, 73, 74, 84, 129, 168, 170, 173, 191, 193, 196, 198, 200, 201, 206
-
TFEU, Article 108
: paragraph 165
-
TFEU, Article 108
-P3 : paragraph 149
-
TFEU, Article 296
: paragraph 130
-
Regulation 659/1999
-A01LB : paragraph 166
-
Regulation 659/1999
-A01LC : paragraph 171
-
Regulation 659/1999
-A01LD : paragraphs 165, 168, 173
-
Regulation 659/1999
-A01LE : paragraphs 165, 167, 172
-
Regulation 659/1999
-A01LF : paragraph 167
-
Regulation 659/1999
-A02P1 : paragraphs 167, 170
-
Decision 2012/26
-A01P1 : paragraph 200
-
Decision 2012/26
-A01P2 : paragraph 200
-
Decision 2012/26
-A01P4 : paragraph 201
-
Decision 2012/26
-A01P5 : paragraph 201
-
Decision 2012/26
-A02 : paragraph 202
-
Decision 2012/26
-A04 : paragraph 202
-
Decision 2012/26
-A05 : paragraph 202
-
Decision 2012/26
-A06 : paragraph 202
-
Decision 2012/26
-A07 : paragraph 202
-
Decision 2012/26
-A08 : paragraph 202
-
Decision 2012/26
-A09 : paragraph 202
-
Decision 2012/26
-A10 : paragraph 202
-
Decision 2012/26
-A11 : paragraph 202
-
Decision 2012/26
-A12 : paragraph 202
-
Decision 2012/26
-C70 : paragraphs 100, 101
-
Decision 2012/26
-C192 : paragraphs 77, 178
-
Decision 2012/26
-C193 : paragraphs 78, 89, 178
-
Decision 2012/26
-C194 : paragraphs 78, 89, 178
-
Decision 2012/26
-C196 : paragraph 189
-
Decision 2012/26
-C197 : paragraphs 189, 195
-
Decision 2012/26
-C198 : paragraphs 189, 195
-
Decision 2012/26
-C199 : paragraphs 93, 182
-
Decision 2012/26
-C200 : paragraph 183
-
Decision 2012/26
-C203 : paragraphs 80, 96, 98, 104, 105
-
Decision 2012/26
-C204 : paragraphs 80, 104, 105
-
Decision 2012/26
-C205 : paragraph 80
-
Decision 2012/26
-C206 : paragraph 80
-
Decision 2012/26
-C207 : paragraph 80
-
Decision 2012/26
-C208 : paragraph 80
-
Decision 2012/26
-C209 : paragraph 80
-
Decision 2012/26
-C210 : paragraph 80
-
Decision 2012/26
-C211 : paragraph 80
-
Decision 2012/26
-C212 : paragraph 80
-
Decision 2012/26
-C213 : paragraph 80
-
Decision 2012/26
-C214 : paragraphs 80, 97, 98, 105, 106, 108, 176, 177, 197
-
Decision 2012/26
-C215 : paragraph 80
-
Decision 2012/26
-C216 : paragraphs 81, 112
-
Decision 2012/26
-C217 : paragraph 81
-
Decision 2012/26
-C218 : paragraph 81
-
Decision 2012/26
-C219 : paragraph 81
-
Decision 2012/26
-C220 : paragraphs 81, 112
-
Decision 2012/26
-C221 : paragraphs 81, 112, 121, 124
-
Decision 2012/26
-C223 : paragraphs 81, 113
-
Decision 2012/26
-C224 : paragraphs 81, 113
-
Decision 2012/26
-C225 : paragraphs 81, 113
-
Decision 2012/26
-C226 : paragraphs 81, 113
-
Decision 2012/26
-C227 : paragraphs 81, 113
-
Decision 2012/26
-C228 : paragraphs 81, 113
-
Decision 2012/26
-C229 : paragraphs 81, 113
-
Decision 2012/26
-C230 : paragraphs 81, 113
-
Decision 2012/26
-C231 : paragraphs 81, 113
-
Decision 2012/26
-C232 : paragraphs 81, 113
-
Decision 2012/26
-C233 : paragraphs 81, 113
-
Decision 2012/26
-C234 : paragraphs 81, 113
-
Decision 2012/26
-C235 : paragraphs 81, 113
-
Decision 2012/26
-C236 : paragraphs 81, 113, 116, 119, 122, 124, 131, 176, 177, 197
-
Decision 2012/26
-C237 : paragraph 81
-
Decision 2012/26
-C246 : paragraphs 122, 124
-
Decision 2012/26
-C248 : paragraph 101
-
Decision 2012/26
-C256 : paragraph 171
-
Decision 2012/26
-C257 : paragraph 171
-
Decision 2012/26
-C258 : paragraph 171
-
Decision 2012/26
-C259 : paragraph 171
-
Decision 2012/26
-CH7.1.4 : paragraph 77
-
Regulation 1589/2015
: paragraph 165
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -301/87
: paragraph 135
-
General Court - Judgment T -55/99
-N39 : paragraph 69
-
General Court - Judgment T -228/99
-N251 : paragraph 71
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -66/02
-N91 : paragraph 162
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -66/02
-N92 : paragraph 162
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -88/03
-N91 : paragraph 162
-
General Court - Judgment T -68/03
-N34 : paragraph 71
-
General Court - Judgment T -349/03
-N287 : paragraph 126
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -237/04
-N38 : paragraph 69
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -237/04
-N39 : paragraph 69
-
General Court - Judgment T -239/04
-N142 : paragraph 162
-
General Court - Judgment T -239/04
-N143 : paragraph 162
-
General Court - Judgment T -239/04
-N144 : paragraph 162
-
General Court - Judgment T -309/04
-N178 : paragraph 130
-
General Court - Judgment T -163/05
-N37 : paragraph 71
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -413/06
-N169 : paragraph 130
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -71/09
-N114 : paragraph 162
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/09
-N151 : paragraph 130
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -81/10
: paragraph 135
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -275/10
: paragraph 148-152
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -275/10
-N39 : paragraph 150
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -275/10
-N40 : paragraph 150
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -275/10
-N41 : paragraph 150
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -275/10
-N42 : paragraph 150
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -399/10
-N102 : paragraph 129
-
General Court - Judgment T -29/10
-N100 : paragraph 73
-
General Court - Judgment T -29/10
-N101 : paragraph 74
-
General Court - Judgment T -29/10
-N102 : paragraph 75
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -559/12
: paragraphs 35, 54, 55, 64, 134, 136, 137, 142, 143, 147, 148, 151, 152, 156, 157, 159 - 161, 188, 193, 197, 204
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -559/12
-N18 : paragraph 144
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -559/12
-N63 : paragraph 72
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -559/12
-N94 : paragraph 70
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -559/12
-N96 : paragraph 136
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -559/12
-N97 : paragraph 136
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -559/12
-N98 : paragraphs 136, 187
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -559/12
-N99 : paragraph 187
Operative part
Opinion
Information not available
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Information not available
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
26/05/2016
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Judgment: OJ C 251 from 11.07.2016, p.20
Application: OJ C 340 from 19.11.2011, p.26
Name of the parties
France v Commission
Notes on Academic Writings
- Derenne, Jacques: Statut d'établissement public - Garantie implicite illimitée - Standard de preuve : Le Tribunal de l'Union européenne annule partiellement la décision de la Commission européenne qualifiant d'aide d'État la garantie implicite illimitée acordée à l'Institut française du Pétrole, Concurrences : revue des droits de la concurrence 2016 nº 3 p.134-135 (FR)
- Karpenstein, Ulrich ; Corzilius, Oriana: Staatliche Beihilfe kraft Rechtsform – Gewährt die Gewährträgerhaftung stets einen wirtschaftlichen Vorteil?, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2016 p.654-656 (DE)
- Saint-Esteben, Robert ; Honoré, Pierre: IFP v Commission : Assessment of Public Establishments of an Industrial and Commercial Character Under State Aid Rules, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2016 Vol. 7 nº 9 p.676-678 (EN)
- Idot, Laurence: Garantie de l'État et statut des EPIC, Europe 2016 Juillet Comm. nº 7 p.35-36 (FR)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Information not available
Subject-matter
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Actions for annulment : application granted
- Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds
Formation of the Court
Information not available
Judge-Rapporteur
Wetter
Advocate General
Information not available
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion
Information not available