Judgment of the Court (Eighth Chamber) of 31 January 2018

Paweł Hofsoe v LVM Landwirtschaftlicher Versicherungsverein Münster AG

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Sąd Okręgowy w Szczecinie

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Jurisdiction and the enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 11(1)(b) and Article 13(2) — Jurisdiction in insurance matters — Scope ratione personae — Concept of ‘injured party’ — Professional in the insurance sector — Not included

Case C-106/17


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment (OJ)
09/03/2018 Hofsoe
View pdf documents
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2018:50
31/01/2018 Hofsoe
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment (Summary)
ECLI:EU:C:2018:50
31/01/2018 Hofsoe
Application (OJ)
09/06/2017 Hofsoe
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
      4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
      4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

  • Regulation 44/2001 -A09P1LB : paragraphs 23, 26, 36
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A11P2 : paragraphs 23, 29, 36
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A04P1 : paragraphs 5, 25, 40
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A05P1 : paragraphs 6, 31
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A10 : paragraph 35
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A11 : paragraph 35
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A11P1LB : paragraphs 1, 8, 25 - 27, 31 - 33, 36 - 39, 41, 43, 47
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A12 : paragraph 35
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A13P2 : paragraphs 1, 9, 25, 27, 29, 31 - 33, 35 - 37, 39, 41, 45, 47
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A17 : paragraph 10
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A17P1 : paragraph 11
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A18 : paragraph 10
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A19 : paragraph 10
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A81 : paragraphs 12, 34
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -C15 : paragraphs 3, 25, 31, 45, 46
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -C18 : paragraphs 3, 25, 44
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -CH2S1 : paragraph 4
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -CH2S3 : paragraphs 7, 39, 44
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -26/91 -N14 : paragraph 40
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -89/91 -N14 : paragraph 40
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -89/91 -N15 : paragraph 40
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -89/91 -N16 : paragraph 40
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -89/91 -N17 : paragraph 40
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -412/98 -N49 : paragraph 40
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -412/98 -N50 : paragraph 40
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -412/98 -N65 : paragraph 41
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -412/98 -N66 : paragraph 41
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -77/04 : paragraph 30
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -77/04 -N20 : paragraphs 41, 42
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -463/06 : paragraph 22
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -347/08 : paragraph 30
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -347/08 -N36 : paragraph 40
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -347/08 -N37 : paragraph 40
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -347/08 -N38 : paragraph 40
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -347/08 -N39 : paragraph 40
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -347/08 -N40 : paragraph 39
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -347/08 -N41 : paragraph 41
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -347/08 -N42 : paragraph 42
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -347/08 -N44 : paragraphs 38, 39
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -352/13 -N60 : paragraph 36
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/14 -N29 : paragraph 44
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/14 -N30 : paragraphs 42, 44
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/14 -N31 : paragraph 42
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -521/14 -N43 : paragraph 36
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -340/16 -N33 : paragraph 37
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -340/16 -N34 : paragraph 45
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -340/16 -N35 : paragraph 38

Operative part

  • Interprets : Regulation 1215/2012 -A11P1LB
  • Interprets : Regulation 1215/2012 -A13P2

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 28/02/2017

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

31/01/2018


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 112 from 26.03.2018, p.5

Application: OJ C 202 from 26.06.2017, p.8

Name of the parties

Hofsoe

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Nourissat, Cyril: Un cessionnaire professionnel de créance ne peut prétendre au bénéfice du forum actoris instauré en matière d'assurance, Procédures 2018 nº 4 p.18 (FR)
  2. Idot, Laurence: Compétence en matière d'assurance, Europe 2018 Mars Comm. nº 3 p.31-32 (FR)
  3. Staudinger, Ansgar ; Papadopoulos, Panagiotis: Zum Wohnsitzgerichtsstand des Geschädigten gem.Art. 13 Abs 2i. V. m. Art. 11 Abs. 1 b EuGVVO - Zugleich Anmerkung zum Urteil des EuGH vom 31. 1.2018(Rs C-106/17) VersR 2018.1020 -, Versicherungsrecht 2018 p.978-983 (DE)
  4. Dominelli, Stefano: Direct Actions of "Injured Parties" in the Brusels Ia Regulation : The Pawel Hofsoe Case of the Court of Justice of the European Union as an Expression of Legal Pragmatism, The European Legal Forum 2018 p.29 - 33 (EN)
  5. Corneloup, Sabine: Compétence pour statuer sur l'action directe contre l'assureur, Revue critique de droit international privé 2018 nº 3 p.609 - 616 (FR)
  6. Piotr Tereszkiewicz, Habil: Begriff eines Geschädigten in Versicherungssachen nach Brüssel la-Verordnung, Zeitschrift für das Privatrecht der Europäischen Union - GPR 2018 N°6 p.280-283 (DE, EN, FR)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Sąd Okręgowy w Szczecinie - Poland

Subject-matter

  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - Judicial cooperation in civil matters

Provisions of national law referred to

Ustawa z dnia 17 listopada 1964 r. - Kodeks postępowania cywilnego, art. 1099 § 1

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Reference for a preliminary ruling

Formation of the Court

huitième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Šváby

Advocate General

Bobek

Language(s) of the Case

  • Polish

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available