Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• TFEU, Article 107 : paragraphs 11, 12
• TFEU, Article 263 : paragraphs 14, 22
• TFEU, Article 263 -L4 : paragraphs 17, 18, 27, 33, 43
• TFEU, Article 263 -L6 : paragraphs 16, 23
• TFEU, Article 267 : paragraph 21
• TFEU - Protocol No 3 -A54L3 : paragraph 25
• Decision 88/591 -C3 : paragraph 19
• Decision 2015/1585 : paragraphs 1, 38, 39
• Decision 2015/1585 -A03P1 : paragraph 9
• Decision 2015/1585 -A03P2 : paragraph 9
• Decision 2015/1585 -A06 : paragraphs 9, 29
• Decision 2015/1585 -A07 : paragraphs 9, 29
• Decision 2015/1585 -A10 : paragraph 28
• Decision 2015/1585 -N3 : paragraph 29
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -25/62 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -188/92 : paragraph 13
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -15/98 -N34 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -15/98 -N36 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -344/98 -N57 : paragraph 24
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -239/99 -N30 : paragraphs 14, 15
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -298/00 -N36 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -298/00 -N39 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -519/07 -N48 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -519/07 -N49 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -519/07 -N54 : paragraph 32
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -71/09 -N53 : paragraph 33
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -71/09 -N56 : paragraph 33
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -320/09 -N58 : paragraph 33
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -320/09 -N59 : paragraph 33
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -494/09 -N22 : paragraph 17
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -494/09 -N23 : paragraph 17
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -550/09 -N46 : paragraph 17
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -550/09 -N48 : paragraph 17
• Court of Justice - Opinion 1/09 -N84 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -133/12 -N60 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -133/12 -N61 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -667/13 -N28 : paragraphs 14, 15
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -667/13 -N29 : paragraph 23
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -158/14 -N66 : paragraph 26
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -158/14 -N67 : paragraph 26
• General Court - Order T -172/14 : paragraph 39
• General Court - Order T -176/14 : paragraph 39
• General Court - Order T -177/14 : paragraph 39
• General Court - Order T -183/14 : paragraph 39
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -72/15 -N67 : paragraph 17

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion

• TFEU, Article 107 : points 24, 70, 73, 133
  
• TFEU, Article 107 -P1 : points 74, 100, 110 - 112, 120, 147
  
• TFEU, Article 108 : point 70
  
• TFEU, Article 108 -P2 : point 18
  
• TFEU, Article 263 : points 26, 34, 40, 46, 47, 50, 64
  
• TFEU, Article 263 -L4 : points 54, 57, 58
  
• TFEU - Protocol No 3 -A23 : point 69
  
• Decision 2011/346 : point 35
  
• Secondary Legislation - Internal Act of the Institutions - 32015Q0423(01) -A60 : point 64
  
• Decision 2015/1585 : points 4 - 6, 20, 23, 24, 51 - 55, 57, 61 - 65, 67, 70, 72, 73, 77, 96 - 98, 123, 138, 146, 148
  
• Decision 2015/1585 -A01 : point 10
  
• Decision 2015/1585 -A03 : points 3, 11
  
• Decision 2015/1585 -A06 : points 56, 59
  
• Decision 2015/1585 -A06P1 : point 12
  
• Decision 2015/1585 -A07 : points 13, 56, 59
  
• Decision 2015/1585 -N3 : point 56
  
• Decision 2015/1585 -C39 : point 143
  
• Decision 2015/1585 -C54 : point 127
  
• Decision 2015/1585 -C106 : point 139
  
• Decision 2015/1585 -C215 : point 97
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52014XC0628(01) : point 98
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52014XC0628(01) -PT185 : point 97
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52014XC0628(01) -PT186 : point 97
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52014XC0628(01) -PT187 : point 97
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52014XC0628(01) -PT188 : point 97
  
• Commission - Other Acts - 52014XC0628(01) -PT189 : point 97
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -173/73 -N35 : point 111
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -78/76 -N21 : point 108
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -78/76 -N22 : point 109
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -82/77 -N25 : point 114
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -82/77 -N26 : point 114
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -314/85 -N14 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -314/85 -N15 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -72/91 -N18 : point 75
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -189/91 -N17 : point 106
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -189/91 -N18 : point 106
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -188/92 -N17 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -188/92 -N18 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -188/92 -N19 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -188/92 -N20 : point 42
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -188/92 : point 7
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -387/92 -N13 : point 79
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -39/94 -N60 : point 78
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -178/95 -N15 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -178/95 -N16 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -178/95 -N17 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -178/95 -N18 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -178/95 -N19 : points 33, 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -178/95 -N20 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -178/95 -N21 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -178/95 -N22 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -178/95 -N23 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -178/95 -N24 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -178/95 -N25 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -176/96 -N23 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -342/96 -N41 : point 78
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -386/96 -N43 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/97 -N15 : point 79
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -52/97 -N13 : point 106
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -52/97 -N14 : point 106
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -15/98 -N33 : point 58
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -156/98 -N25 : point 79
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -379/98 : point 9
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -379/98 -N58 : point 108
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -379/98 -N59 : point 115
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -379/98 -N60 : point 115
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -379/98 -N61 : point 115
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -379/98 -N62 : points 106, 115
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/99 -N55 : point 68
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -239/99 : points 32, 49
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -239/99 -N29 : points 33, 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -239/99 -N30 : points 33, 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -239/99 -N31 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -239/99 -N32 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -239/99 -N33 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -239/99 -N34 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -239/99 -N35 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -239/99 -N36 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -239/99 -N37 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -239/99 -N38 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -239/99 -N39 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -239/99 -N40 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/99 -N23 : point 108
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/99 -N24 : point 100
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/99 -N37 : point 110
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -241/01 -N36 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -345/02 -N33 : point 75
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -345/02 -N41 : point 113
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -88/03 -N81 : point 94
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -172/03 -N36 : point 79
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -172/03 -N54 : point 84
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -346/03 -N30 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -346/03 -N31 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -346/03 -N32 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -346/03 -N33 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -346/03 -N34 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -222/04 -N63 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -222/04 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -344/04 -N27 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -344/04 -N30 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -393/04 -N46 : point 135
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -119/05 -N56 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/05 -N35 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/05 -N36 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/05 -N37 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/05 -N38 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/05 -N39 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/05 -N40 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/05 -N41 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/05 -N42 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/05 -N43 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/05 -N44 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/05 -N45 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/05 -N46 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/05 -N47 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/05 -N48 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -206/06 : point 123
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -206/06 -N69 : point 117
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -206/06 -N70 : points 110, 117, 134
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -206/06 -N71 : point 117
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -206/06 -N72 : point 117
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -206/06 -N73 : point 117
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -206/06 -N74 : points 115, 117
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -206/06 -N75 : point 117
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -206/06 -N79 : point 78
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -487/06 : point 94
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -222/07 -N43 : point 115
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -222/07 -N44 : point 115
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -222/07 -N45 : point 115
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -222/07 -N46 : point 115
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -222/07 -N47 : point 115
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -519/07 -N48 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -519/07 -N53 : point 58
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -78/08 -N69 : point 94
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -78/08 -N70 : point 94
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -279/08 : point 94
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -71/09 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -550/09 -N37 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -550/09 -N38 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -550/09 -N39 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -550/09 -N40 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -550/09 -N41 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -550/09 -N42 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -550/09 -N43 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -550/09 -N44 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -550/09 -N45 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -550/09 -N46 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -550/09 -N47 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -550/09 -N48 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -550/09 -N49 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -550/09 -N50 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -550/09 -N51 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -550/09 -N52 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/11 -N95 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -677/11 : point 135
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -677/11 -N36 : point 113
  
• General Court - Judgment T -251/11 : point 123
  
• General Court - Judgment T -487/11 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/12 -N27 : point 94
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -262/12 : points 9, 123
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -262/12 -N15 : point 75
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -262/12 -N16 : point 100
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -262/12 -N18 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -262/12 -N21 : point 110
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -262/12 -N25 : points 111, 118, 134
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -262/12 -N26 : point 118
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -262/12 -N35 : point 115
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12 -N39 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12 -N41 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -374/12 -N24 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -374/12 -N25 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -374/12 -N26 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -374/12 -N27 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -374/12 -N28 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -374/12 -N29 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -374/12 -N30 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -374/12 -N31 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -374/12 -N32 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -374/12 -N33 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -374/12 -N34 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -374/12 -N35 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -374/12 -N36 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -374/12 -N37 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -374/12 -N38 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -368/12 : point 67
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -368/12 -N22 : point 68
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -368/12 -N24 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -368/12 -N25 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -667/13 : point 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -667/13 -N27 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -667/13 -N28 : points 33, 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -667/13 -N29 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -667/13 -N30 : points 33, 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -667/13 -N31 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -667/13 -N32 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -690/13 -N17 : point 75
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -690/13 -N20 : point 78
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -690/13 -N22 : point 89
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -275/13 : point 123
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -275/13 -N20 : point 119
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -275/13 -N23 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -275/13 -N30 : point 120
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -275/13 -N31 : point 120
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -275/13 -N32 : point 134
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -158/14 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -158/14 -N70 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -158/14 -N71 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -158/14 -N72 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -158/14 -N73 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -158/14 -N74 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -158/14 -N75 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -191/14 -N57 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -524/14 -N40 : point 75
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -547/14 -N48 : point 68
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -547/14 -N49 : point 69
  
• General Court - Order T -172/14 : points 19, 60
  
• General Court - Order T -173/14 : point 19
  
• General Court - Order T -174/14 : point 19
  
• General Court - Order T -175/14 : point 19
  
• General Court - Order T -176/14 : points 19, 60
  
• General Court - Order T -176/14 -N13 : point 62
  
• General Court - Order T -176/14 -N14 : point 62
  
• General Court - Order T -176/14 -N15 : point 62
  
• General Court - Order T -176/14 -N16 : point 62
  
• General Court - Order T -176/14 -N24 : point 60
  
• General Court - Order T -177/14 : points 19, 60
  
• General Court - Order T -178/14 : point 19
  
• General Court - Order T -179/14 : point 19
  
• General Court - Order T -183/14 : points 19, 60
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -189/15 : point 2
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -329/15 -N17 : point 75
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -329/15 -N20 : point 100
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -329/15 -N22 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -329/15 -N23 : point 108
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -329/15 -N25 : point 110
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -329/15 -N26 : point 115
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -329/15 -N27 : point 116
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -329/15 -N28 : point 116
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -329/15 -N29 : point 116
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -329/15 -N30 : point 116
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -656/15 -N59 : point 121
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -656/15 -N63 : point 121
  
• General Court - Judgment T -47/15 : point 5
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -74/16 -N38 : point 75
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -74/16 -N65 : point 78
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -74/16 -N66 : point 79
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -640/16 -N61 : point 41
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -640/16 -N62 : point 41
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -640/16 -N63 : point 41
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 07/03/2016

Date of the Opinion

• 27/02/2018

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

25/07/2018

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 328 from 17.09.2018, p.4

Application: OJ C 211 from 13.06.2016, p.27

Name of the parties

Georgsmarienhütte and Others

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Ehrmann, Markus: Unterbliebene Geltendmachung einer Nichtigkeitsklage, Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht 2018 N°17 p.1291-1292 (DE)
2. Pompl, Raphael: Beihilferecht: Unterbliebene Geltendmachung einer Nichtigkeitsklage, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2018 p.817-818 (DE)
3. Peraldi-Leneuf, Fabienne: Retour sur l'arrêt TWD Textilwerke : la Cour étend le principe de la forclusion dans le cas où l'expiration du délai de recours en annulation au titre de l'article 263, alinéa 6 TFUE n'est pas expiré., Europe 2018 Octobre Comm. nº 10 p.23-24 (FR)
4. Graevenitz, v. Albrecht: Vorabentscheidungsverfahren: Zulässigkeit bei Rechtsschutz im Nichtigkeitsverfahren, Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb 2018 p.525 (DE)
5. Brunner, Rene: Dual Remedy Against State Aid Decisions, European State Aid Law Quarterly 2019 Vol.18 N°3 p.413-417 (EN)
6. Coutron, Laurent: Chronique de jurisprudence de la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne (2018), Revue du droit public et de la science politique en France et à l'étranger 2019, n° 5, p. 1417-1434 (FR)
7. Derenne, Jacques ; Chilaru, Catalina: Renvoi préjudiciel en appréciation de validité et recours en annulation: quelle protection juridictionnelle effective en particulier en matière d'aides d'État? : à propos de l'arrêt Georgsmarienhütte du 25 juillet 2018 e.a., aff. C-135/16, EU:C:2018:582, Revue des affaires européennes 2019 p.267-175 (FR)
8. Coutron, Laurent: IV. Recours - Cour de justice, gde ch., 25 juillet 2018, Georgsmarienhütte GmbH e.a. c/ Bundesrepublik Deutschland, aff. C-135/16, ECLI:EU:C:2018:582, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2018. Décisions et commentaires (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2019, p. 173-182 (FR)
9. Coutron, Laurent: Contentieux de l'UE - Sur un revirement inassumé ? Georgsmarienhütte vs TWD (CJUE, gr. ch., 25 juill. 2018, aff. C-135/16, Georgsmarienhütte), Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 2019, n° 2, p. 469-473 (FR)
10. Rolin, Frédérique: De l’articulation entre renvoi préjudiciel en validité et recours en annulation : Pour une lecture constructive de l’arrêt Georsgmarienhütte, Building the European Union: The Jurist’s View of the Union’s Evolution Hart Publishing, 2021, p. 245-252 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Verwaltungsgericht Frankfurt am Main - Germany

Subject-matter

• Competition
  
• - State aid
  
• Transport
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling : dismissal on grounds of inadmissibility
  

Formation of the Court

Information not available

Judge-Rapporteur

da Cruz Vilaça

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

• German
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

Information not available