Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 25 June 2020

European Union Satellite Centre v KF

Appeal — Staff of the European Union Satellite Centre (SatCen) — Member of SatCen’s contract staff — Complaints of psychological harassment — Administrative investigation — Request for assistance — Suspension of the staff member — Disciplinary proceedings — Removal of the staff member — SatCen’s Appeals Board — Conferral of exclusive jurisdiction in relation to SatCen staff disputes — Action for annulment — First and fifth paragraphs of Article 263 TFEU — Actions for damages — Article 268 TFEU — Jurisdiction of the EU judicature — Admissibility — Acts open to challenge — Contractual nature of the dispute — Articles 272 and 274 TFEU — Effective judicial protection — Final sentence of the second subparagraph of Article 24(1) TEU — First paragraph of Article 275 TFEU — Principle of equal treatment — General Court’s obligation to state reasons — Distortion of the facts and evidence — Rights of the defence — Principle of sound administration

Case C-14/19 P



Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2020:492
25/06/2020 CSUE v KF
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Abstract
ECLI:EU:C:2020:492
25/06/2020 CSUE v KF
Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:2020:220
19/03/2020 CSUE v KF
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Application (OJ)
26/04/2019 CSUE v KF
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

not yet published (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Information not available


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

  • Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 41 : paragraph 115
  • Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 41 -P2 : paragraph 116
  • TFEU - Protocol No 3 -A58L1 : paragraphs 103, 105
  • TFEU, Article 256 : paragraph 105
  • TFEU, Article 256 -P1L2 : paragraph 103
  • TFEU, Article 263 : paragraphs 37, 38, 54, 72, 78, 80, 84, 86, 89
  • TFEU, Article 263 -L1 : paragraphs 67, 73, 75, 77
  • TFEU, Article 263 -L4 : paragraph 74
  • TFEU, Article 263 -L5 : paragraphs 49, 58, 62, 65
  • TFEU, Article 268 : paragraphs 37, 54, 82, 84, 86, 89
  • TFEU, Article 270 : paragraphs 50, 76
  • TFEU, Article 272 : paragraphs 53, 79, 80
  • TFEU, Article 274 : paragraphs 78 - 80
  • TFEU, Article 275 -L1 : paragraphs 66, 92
  • TFEU, Article 277 : paragraph 40
  • TFEU, Article 288 : paragraph 68
  • TFEU, Article 340 -L2 : paragraph 82
  • TEU, Article 2 : paragraphs 58, 59
  • TEU, Article 5 : paragraphs 47, 87
  • TEU, Article 19 : paragraphs 59, 66
  • TEU, Article 24 -P1L2 : paragraphs 66, 92
  • Staff Regulations of the EC : paragraph 76
  • Conditions of Employment of other Servants of the EC : paragraph 76
  • Common Foreign and Security Policy 2001/555 : paragraph 4
  • Decision 2009/747 : paragraph 76
  • Decision 2009/747 -A02P1 : paragraph 8
  • Decision 2009/747 -A27 : paragraphs 9, 22
  • Decision 2009/747 -A28 : paragraph 10
  • Decision 2009/747 -A28P6 : paragraphs 40, 49, 58
  • Decision 2009/747 -A28P6SNT2 : paragraphs 64, 65, 83
  • Decision 2009/747 -N9A01P1 : paragraphs 11, 118
  • Decision 2009/747 -N9A02 : paragraphs 12, 26, 119
  • Decision 2009/747 -N9A10 : paragraph 31
  • Decision 2009/747 -N10PT1 : paragraphs 13, 63
  • Decision 2009/747 -N10PT2LA : paragraph 15
  • Decision 2009/747 -N10PT2LB : paragraph 15
  • Decision 2009/747 -N10PT2LD : paragraph 15
  • Decision 2009/747 -N10PT2LE : paragraph 15
  • Decision 2009/747 -N10PT4LB : paragraph 14
  • Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A168P1LD : paragraph 105
  • Decision 2014/401 : paragraph 76
  • Decision 2014/401 -A02P1 : paragraph 5
  • Decision 2014/401 -A02P3 : paragraph 5
  • Decision 2014/401 -A07P3 : paragraph 6
  • Decision 2014/401 -A07P4 : paragraph 6
  • Decision 2014/401 -A07P6L2LE : paragraph 6
  • Decision 2014/401 -A08 : paragraph 7
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -190/84 -N8 : paragraph 73
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -443/97 -N28 : paragraph 73
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -362/08 -N52 : paragraph 70
  • Court of Justice - Opinion 1/09 -N70 : paragraph 60
  • Court of Justice - Opinion 1/09 -N85 : paragraph 61
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -103/11 -N61 : paragraph 81
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -103/11 -N62 : paragraph 82
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -103/11 -N65 : paragraph 81
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -334/12 -N28 : paragraph 122
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -261/13 -N13 : paragraph 69
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -439/13 : paragraph 48
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -506/13 -N16 : paragraph 69
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -506/13 -N17 : paragraph 68
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -506/13 -N18 : paragraph 78
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -506/13 -N19 : paragraph 79
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -506/13 -N20 : paragraph 78
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -431/14 -N30 : paragraph 103
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -431/14 -N31 : paragraph 104
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -431/14 -N32 : paragraph 105
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -455/14 : paragraphs 52, 54
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -455/14 -N39 : paragraph 66
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -455/14 -N40 : paragraph 66
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -455/14 -N41 : paragraph 58
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -455/14 -N54 : paragraph 66
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -455/14 -N55 : paragraph 66
  • General Court - Judgment T -286/15 : paragraphs 1 - 126
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -100/16 -N32 : paragraph 96
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -73/17 -N15 : paragraph 73
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/17 -N164 : paragraph 90
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -558/17 -N53 : paragraph 117
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -558/17 -N56 : paragraph 120
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -558/17 -N57 : paragraph 121
  • Court of Justice - Opinion 1/17 -N111 : paragraph 59
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -14/18 -N48 : paragraph 78
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -14/18 -N49 : paragraph 79
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -14/18 -N50 : paragraph 78
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -585/18 -N167 : paragraph 59

Operative part

Opinion

  • Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 41 : point 148
  • Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47 : points 37, 55, 69, 83, 122, 128, 129
  • Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51 -P1 : point 66
  • Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51 -P2 : point 69
  • TFEU, Article 7 : point 65
  • TFEU, Article 24 -P1 : point 75
  • TFEU, Article 218 : point 53
  • TFEU, Article 256 : point 121
  • TFEU, Article 263 : points 36, 37, 105, 107, 110, 112
  • TFEU, Article 263 -L1 : points 47, 109
  • TFEU, Article 263 -L4 : points 109, 111
  • TFEU, Article 263 -L5 : point 129
  • TFEU, Article 267 : points 55, 71, 114
  • TFEU, Article 268 : points 36, 37, 47, 71, 105, 107
  • TFEU, Article 270 : points 48, 91, 104, 112
  • TFEU, Article 272 : points 48, 98
  • TFEU, Article 274 : point 98
  • TFEU, Article 275 : points 1, 51, 52, 55, 58, 62 - 64, 66, 72, 74, 78, 107
  • TFEU, Article 340 : point 71
  • TFEU, Article 340 -L1 : point 98
  • TFEU, Article 340 -L2 : point 37
  • TEU, Article 2 : point 67
  • TEU, Article 13 -P2 : point 69
  • TEU, Article 19 : points 55, 58, 70, 121
  • TEU, Article 19 -P1 : points 37, 101, 122
  • TEU, Article 21 : point 67
  • TEU, Article 21 -P1 : point 65
  • TEU, Article 21 -P2 : point 65
  • TEU, Article 21 -P3 : point 65
  • TEU, Article 23 : point 67
  • TEU, Article 24 : point 55
  • TEU, Article 24 -P1 : points 1, 51, 52, 58, 62 - 66, 72, 74, 78, 107
  • TEU, Article 26 : point 72
  • TEU, Article 40 : point 55
  • Staff Regulations of the EC : point 91
  • Conditions of Employment of other Servants of the EC : point 91
  • Common Foreign and Security Policy 2001/555 : points 5, 8
  • Regulation 1605/2002 : point 54
  • Decision 2009/747 : points 8, 92
  • Decision 2009/747 -A01P1 : point 93
  • Decision 2009/747 -A01P2 : point 94
  • Decision 2009/747 -A01P2LA : point 103
  • Decision 2009/747 -A27 : point 18
  • Decision 2009/747 -A28P1 : point 123
  • Decision 2009/747 -A28P2 : point 123
  • Decision 2009/747 -A28P3 : point 123
  • Decision 2009/747 -A28P4 : point 123
  • Decision 2009/747 -A28P5 : points 9, 123, 124
  • Decision 2009/747 -A28P6 : points 10, 38, 118 - 122, 125, 126, 129, 136, 137
  • Decision 2009/747 -N9A01 : point 148
  • Decision 2009/747 -N9A02 : points 148, 155
  • Decision 2009/747 -N9A10 : point 25
  • Decision 2009/747 -N10A01 : points 11, 124
  • Regulation 810/2009 -A32P3 : point 127
  • Decision 2014/401 -A02P1 : point 6
  • Decision 2014/401 -A02P3 : point 6
  • Decision 2014/401 -A05 : point 6
  • Decision 2014/401 -A07P3 : point 7
  • Decision 2014/401 -A07P4 : point 7
  • Decision 2014/401 -A07P6LE : point 7
  • Decision 2014/401 -A08P1 : point 8
  • Decision 2014/401 -A08P3 : point 8
  • Decision 2014/401 -A08P5 : point 8
  • Decision 2014/401 -C2 : point 6
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -60/81 -N9 : point 111
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -294/83 -N23 : point 67
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -294/83 -N24 : point 68
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -190/84 -N8 : point 110
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -314/91 -N9 : point 110
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -443/97 -N28 : point 110
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -50/00 -N44 : point 69
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -409/02 -N32 : point 99
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -409/02 -N33 : point 99
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -409/02 -N34 : point 99
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -409/02 -N35 : point 99
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -409/02 -N36 : point 99
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -409/02 -N33 : point 99
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -326/05 -N57 : point 142
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -326/05 -N60 : point 142
  • Court of Justice - Opinion 1/09 -N66 : point 133
  • Court of Justice - Opinion 1/09 -N68 : point 133
  • Court of Justice - Opinion 1/09 -N80 : point 133
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -658/11 : point 53
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -334/12 -N28 : point 159
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -261/13 -N13 : point 111
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -439/13 : points 46, 54, 88, 89
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -439/13 -N67 : point 68
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -506/13 -N19 : point 98
  • Court of Justice - Opinion 2/13 -N174 : point 133
  • Court of Justice - Opinion 2/13 -N175 : point 133
  • Court of Justice - Opinion 2/13 -N176 : point 133
  • Court of Justice - Opinion 2/13 -N246 : point 133
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -455/14 -N45 : point 66
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -455/14 -N59 : point 74
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -258/14 : point 71
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -263/14 : point 53
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -362/14 -N95 : point 68
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -440/14 -N77 : point 78
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -455/14 : points 47, 114
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -455/14 -N54 : point 56
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -455/14 -N55 : point 56
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -613/14 : point 71
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -72/15 -N52 : point 78
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -8/15 : point 71
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -72/15 : point 55
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -72/15 -N74 : point 69
  • General Court - Judgment T -286/15 : points 3 - 160
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -403/16 -N28 : point 127
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -403/16 -N29 : point 127
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -403/16 -N30 : point 127
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -403/16 -N31 : point 127
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -403/16 -N32 : point 127
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -403/16 -N33 : point 127
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -326/16 -N38 : point 137
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -326/16 -N39 : point 137
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -403/16 -N41 : point 133
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -558/17 -N52 : point 154
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -558/17 -N59 : point 156
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -663/17 -N54 : point 67
  • Court of Justice - Opinion 1/17 -N111 : point 133
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -570/18 -N71 : point 156
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -570/18 -N72 : point 156
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -418/18 -N95 : point 78
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -418/18 -N96 : point 78
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -730/18 : point 92


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 10/01/2019

Date of the Opinion

  • 19/03/2020

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

25/06/2020


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Information not available

Name of the parties

CSUE v KF

Notes on Academic Writings

Information not available



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • Provisions governing the institutions

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment
  • Action for damages
  • Appeals : dismissal on substantive grounds

Formation of the Court

deuxième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Arabadjiev

Advocate General

Bobek

Language(s) of the Case

  • English

Language(s) of the Opinion

  • English