Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber), 13 June 2013

Goldbet Sportwetten GmbH v Massimo Sperindeo

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof

Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 — European order for payment procedure — Articles 6 and 17 — Opposition to the European order for payment without any challenge to the jurisdiction of the court of the Member State of origin — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Jurisdiction and recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters — Article 24 — Entering of an appearance of the defendant before the court seised — Applicability in the context of the European order for payment procedure

Case C‑144/12


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment (OJ)
18/07/2013 Goldbet Sportwetten
View pdf documents
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2013:393
13/06/2013 Goldbet Sportwetten
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment (Summary)
ECLI:EU:C:2013:393
13/06/2013 Goldbet Sportwetten
Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:2013:136
06/03/2013 Goldbet Sportwetten
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Application (OJ)
08/06/2012 Goldbet Sportwetten
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
      4.06.02.07 European order for payment procedure
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
      4.06.02.07 European order for payment procedure


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

  • Regulation 44/2001 -A05P1LA : paragraph 11
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A05P1LB : paragraph 11
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A24 : paragraphs 12, 22 - 24, 27, 32, 34, 36 - 38, 41, 43
  • Regulation 1896/2006 : paragraphs 30, 32
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -A01P1LA : paragraphs 4, 28, 42
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -A05 : paragraph 5
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -A06 : paragraphs 1, 22, 23, 43
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -A06P1 : paragraphs 6, 26
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -A12P3 : paragraphs 7, 29
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -A16P1 : paragraphs 8, 33
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -A16P3 : paragraphs 8, 40
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -A16P4 : paragraph 8
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -A17 : paragraphs 22, 23, 43
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -A17P1 : paragraphs 9, 26, 31, 39
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -C23 : paragraphs 3, 33
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -C24 : paragraph 3
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -N6 : paragraphs 10, 33
  • Brussels Convention 1968 -A18 : paragraph 37
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -150/80 : paragraph 37
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -215/11 : paragraph 28
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -144/12 : paragraphs 29, 39

Operative part

  • Interprets : Regulation 44/2001 -A24
  • Interprets : Regulation 1896/2006 -A06
  • Interprets : Regulation 1896/2006 -A17

Opinion

  • Regulation 44/2001 : points 1, 43
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A05P1 : point 9
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A24 : points 2, 4, 10, 19 - 21, 44, 50, 51
  • Regulation 1896/2006 : points 2, 23, 25, 43, 45
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -A01P1LA : point 5
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -A05P10 : point 30
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -A05P3 : points 28, 30, 31, 33
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -A05P9 : point 30
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -A06 : point 19
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -A06P1 : points 1, 3, 6, 20, 21, 50, 51
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -A07 : point 31
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -A07P11 : point 30
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -A07P12 : point 30
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -A07P3 : point 30
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -A07P8 : point 30
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -A16 : point 7
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -A16P1 : point 47
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -A16P2 : point 31
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -A16P3 : point 47
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -A17 : points 8, 19
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -A17P1 : points 31, 36
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -A17P2 : point 31
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -C16 : point 28
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -C23 : points 31, 47, 49
  • Regulation 1896/2006 -C24 : point 31
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -215/11 : point 26


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 23/03/2012

Date of the Opinion

  • 06/03/2013

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

13/06/2013


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 184 from 23.06.2012, p.3

Judgment: OJ C 225 from 03.08.2013, p.29

Name of the parties

Goldbet Sportwetten

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Berlin, Dominique: S'opposer n'est pas comparaître, La Semaine Juridique - édition générale 2013 nº 27 p.1335 (FR)
  2. Sujecki, Bartosz: Zivilverfahrensrecht: Keine rügelose Einlassung im Sinne der EuGVVO durch Einspruch gegen Europäischen Zahlungsbefehl, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2013 p.630 (DE)
  3. Idot, Laurence: Opposition sans contestation de la compétence. Dans la procédure européenne d'injonction de payer, le fait de former opposition, y compris en présentant des moyens de fond, ne peut être analysé comme une comparution volontaire justifiant la compétence du juge saisi dans le cadre de la procédure ordinaire, Europe 2013 Août Comm. nº 8-9 p.51-52 (FR)
  4. Velkaverh, Aleš: Evropski plačilni nalog in ugovor o nepristojnosti, Odvetnik : revija odvetniške zbornice Slovenije 2013 n° 4 (62) p.46 (SL)
  5. Strikwerda, L.: Nederlandse jurisprudentie ; Uitspraken in burgerlijke en strafzaken 2014 n° 33 (NL)
  6. Koutsoukou, Georgia: Einspruch gegen den Europäischen Zahlungsbefehl als rügelose Einlassung?, Praxis des internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts 2014 p.44-48 (DE)
  7. Lopez De Tejada, Maria: Du 13 juin 2013 - Cour de justice de l'Union européenne - Aff. C-144/12, Revue critique de droit international privé 2014 nº 1 p.141-145 (FR)
  8. Cerrato, Alfonso: Primi chiarimenti della Corte di giustizia dell'Unione europea sul procedimento europeo d'ingiunzione di pagamento, Giurisprudenza italiana 2014 p.310-315 (IT)
  9. Eichel, Florian: Keine rügelose Einlassung im Europäischen Mahnverfahren, Zeitschrift für das Privatrecht der Europäischen Union - GPR 2014 p.56-59 (DE)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Oberster Gerichtshof - Austria

Subject-matter

  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - Judicial cooperation in civil matters

Provisions of national law referred to

AT - Zivilprozessordnung, Paragraph 252

Gesetz vom 1. August 1895, über das gerichtliche Verfahren in bürgerlichen Rechtsstreitigkeiten (Zivilprozessordnung - ZPO), Paragraph 252

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Reference for a preliminary ruling

Formation of the Court

troisième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Ilešič

Advocate General

Bot

Language(s) of the Case

  • German

Language(s) of the Opinion

  • French