Judgment of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 8 February 2018

Lloyd's of London v Agenzia Regionale per la Protezione dell'Ambiente della Calabria

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale Calabria

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Public procurement — Articles 49 and 56 TFEU — Directive 2004/18/EC — Reasons for exclusion from a tendering procedure — Insurance services — Participation of several Lloyd’s of London syndicates in the same tendering procedure — Signature of tenders by the Lloyd’s of London General Representative for the country concerned — Principles of transparency, equal treatment and non-discrimination — Proportionality

Case C-144/17


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment (OJ)
16/03/2018 Lloyd's of London
View pdf documents
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2018:78
08/02/2018 Lloyd's of London
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment (Summary)
ECLI:EU:C:2018:78
08/02/2018 Lloyd's of London
Application (OJ)
16/06/2017 Lloyd's of London
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.02 Public procurement
      4.11.02.01 Principles governing public procurement
        4.11.02.01.01 Equal treatment and transparency
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.02 Public procurement
      4.11.02.02 General rules applicable to public contracts
        4.11.02.02.02 Conduct of procurement procedures
          4.11.02.02.02.04 Choice of participants
            4.11.02.02.02.04.03 Grounds for exclusion


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

  • TFEU, Article 49 : paragraphs 1, 23, 24, 46
  • TFEU, Article 56 : paragraphs 1, 23, 24, 46
  • TFEU, Article 101 : paragraph 20
  • TFEU, Article 102 : paragraph 20
  • TFEU, Article 267 : paragraph 22
  • Directive 2004/18 : paragraphs 23, 25 - 28, 32 - 45
  • Directive 2004/18 -A02 : paragraphs 1, 4, 24, 46
  • Directive 2004/18 -A45 : paragraphs 5, 29 - 31
  • Directive 2004/18 -C46 : paragraph 3
  • Directive 2009/138 : paragraph 20
  • Directive 2009/138 -A145P2 : paragraph 7
  • Directive 2009/138 -A145P2LC : paragraph 42
  • Directive 2014/24 : paragraphs 25, 26
  • Directive 2014/24 -A90P1 : paragraph 6
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -420/06 -N46 : paragraph 22
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -213/07 -N42 : paragraph 29
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -213/07 -N43 : paragraph 29
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -538/07 -N21 : paragraph 30
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -538/07 -N22 : paragraph 31
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -538/07 -N23 : paragraph 32
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -538/07 -N24 : paragraph 32
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -538/07 -N25 : paragraph 33
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -538/07 -N26 : paragraph 34
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -538/07 -N28 : paragraph 35
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -538/07 -N29 : paragraph 36
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -538/07 -N30 : paragraph 36
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -538/07 -N31 : paragraph 37
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -538/07 -N32 : paragraph 38
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -376/08 -N33 : paragraph 32
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -376/08 -N38 : paragraph 35
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -376/08 -N39 : paragraph 36
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -376/08 -N40 : paragraphs 34 - 36
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -278/14 -N16 : paragraph 23
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -425/14 -N29 : paragraph 32
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -425/14 -N36 : paragraphs 34 - 36
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -425/14 -N38 : paragraph 35
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -223/16 -N21 : paragraph 25

Operative part

  • Interprets : TFEU, Article 49
  • Interprets : TFEU, Article 56
  • Interprets : Directive 2004/18 -A02

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 22/03/2017

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

08/02/2018


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 123 from 09.04.2018, p.6

Application: OJ C 213 from 03.07.2017, p.18

Name of the parties

Lloyd's of London

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Daniel, Élise: Motifs d'exclusion de la participation à un appel d'offres, Europe 2018 avril nº 4 p.26-27 (FR)
  2. Gölles, Hans: Ausschluss wegen potentieller Kollusion; Möglichkeit der Beteiligung von mehreren abhängigen Unternehmen derselben Gruppe, Zeitschrift für Vergaberecht und Beschaffungspraxis 2018 p.382-383 (DE)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Tribunale amministrativo regionale per la Calabria - Italy

Subject-matter

  • Competition
  • Approximation of laws

Procedure and result

  • Reference for a preliminary ruling

Formation of the Court

sixième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Regan

Advocate General

Tanchev

Language(s) of the Case

  • Italian

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available