Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 12 October 2016

Marjan Kostanjevec v F&S Leasing, GmbH

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Vrhovno sodišče

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil matters — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Article 6(3) — Definition of ‘counterclaim’ — Claim based on unjust enrichment — Payment of a sum due under a decision that has been set aside — Temporal application

Case C-185/15


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment (OJ)
25/11/2016 Kostanjevec
View pdf documents
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2016:763
12/10/2016 Kostanjevec
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment (Summary)
ECLI:EU:C:2016:763
12/10/2016 Kostanjevec
Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:2016:397
02/06/2016 Kostanjevec
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Application (OJ)
17/07/2015 Kostanjevec
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
3 Legal proceedings
  3.04 Reference for a preliminary ruling
    3.04.02 Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice
3 Legal proceedings
  3.04 Reference for a preliminary ruling
    3.04.02 Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
      4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
      4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

  • Regulation 44/2001 : paragraphs 24, 29, 36
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A02P1 : paragraph 6
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A03P1 : paragraph 7
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A05 : paragraph 8
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A05PT1 : paragraphs 1, 24
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A06PT3 : paragraphs 1, 9, 24, 31, 32, 35, 39, 40, 41
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A15P1 : paragraphs 1, 24
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A15P1LB : paragraph 22
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A15P1LC : paragraph 10
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A16 : paragraph 11
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A30 : paragraph 12
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A66 : paragraph 13
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A66P1 : paragraphs 25, 26, 27
  • Regulation 44/2001 -CH2 : paragraph 5
  • Regulation 44/2001 -C2 : paragraph 3
  • Regulation 44/2001 -C11 : paragraph 4
  • Regulation 44/2001 -C12 : paragraph 4
  • Regulation 44/2001 -C13 : paragraph 4
  • Regulation 44/2001 -C15 : paragraph 4
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -341/93 : paragraph 32
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -185/15 : paragraphs 27, 33, 36

Operative part

  • Interprets : Regulation 44/2001 -A06PT3

Opinion

  • Regulation 44/2001 : points 1 - 3, 21 - 23, 26, 28, 30, 34, 43, 50
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A05 : point 5
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A05PT1 : points 19, 56, 58, 61
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A05PT1LA : points 63, 65
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A05PT1LB : point 63
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A05PT1LC : point 63
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A06 : point 6
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A06PT3 : points 19, 36 - 38, 42, 48, 49, 52, 67
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A15P1 : points 7, 19, 55
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A16 : point 8
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A28 : point 9
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A28 : point 43
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A28P3 : point 43
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A66 : points 24, 27, 31 - 33
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A66P1 : point 10
  • Regulation 44/2001 -C11 : point 4
  • Regulation 44/2001 -CH2S9 : point 31
  • Regulation 864/2007 : point 47
  • Regulation 864/2007 -A10P1 : points 12, 47
  • Regulation 864/2007 -C7 : point 11
  • Regulation 593/2008 : point 47
  • Regulation 593/2008 -A12P1 : point 14
  • Regulation 593/2008 -A12P1LE : points 47, 64
  • Regulation 593/2008 -C7 : point 13
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -12/76 -N13 : point 63
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -12/76 -N15 : point 63
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -14/76 : point 58
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -14/76 -N13 : point 64
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -14/76 -N14 : point 64
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -26/91 : point 58
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -341/93 -N26 : point 39
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -341/93 -N35 : point 44
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -341/93 -N7 : point 44
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -341/93 -N12 : point 38
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -341/93 -N18 : point 32
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -334/00 -N23 : point 58
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/02 -N48 : point 58
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/02 -N50 : point 58
  • Court of Justice - Order C -69/02 : point 43
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -533/07 -N29 : point 63
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -533/07 -N47 : point 63
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -381/08 -N32 : point 63
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -514/10 -N25 : point 22
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -514/10 -N19 : point 22
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -419/11 -N21 : point 23
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -366/13 -N55 : point 59
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -366/13 -N58 : point 59
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -297/14 -N33 : point 54


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 22/04/2015

Date of the Opinion

  • 02/06/2016

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

12/10/2016


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 462 from 12.12.2016, p.4

Application: OJ C 254 from 03.08.2015, p.4

Name of the parties

Kostanjevec

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Idot, Laurence: Une demande en remboursement d'une somme versée dans le cadre d'une transaction, à la suite de l'annulation de la décision initiale dont l'exécution avait donné lieu à la transaction, est une demande reconventionnelle, Europe 2016 Décembre Comm. nº 12 p.45 (FR)
  2. Velkaverh, Aleš: Atrakcija pristojnosti pri nasprotni tožbi, Odvetnik : revija odvetniške zbornice Slovenije 2016 n° 5 p.60-61 (SL)
  3. Idot, Laurence: Notion de « demande reconventionnelle », Europe 2016 Décembre nº 12 p.45 (FR)
  4. Nourissat, Cyril: Demande reconventionnelle en répétition de l'indu, Procédures 2017 nº 1 p.25 (FR)
  5. Strikwerda, L.: Nederlandse jurisprudentie ; Uitspraken in burgerlijke en strafzaken 2017 Afl.17 p.2591-2593 (NL)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije - Slovenia

Subject-matter

  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - Judicial cooperation in civil matters

Provisions of national law referred to

Obligacijski zakonik, člen 190 Zakon o pravdnem postopku, člen 183

SI - Obligacijski zakonik, člena 190 Zakon o mednarodnem zasebnem pravu, člena 49 Zakon o pravdnem postopku, člena 183

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Reference for a preliminary ruling
  • Reference for a preliminary ruling : case not proceeding to judgment

Formation of the Court

troisième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Safjan

Advocate General

Kokott

Language(s) of the Case

  • Slovene

Language(s) of the Opinion

  • German