Reports of Cases
published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)
Subject-matter
Information not available
Systematic classification scheme
1.
|
|
4 Internal policy of the European Union
4.14 Social policy
4.14.01 Equality and non-discrimination
4.14.01.01 General framework for equal treatment in employment and occupation (Directive 2000/78)
4.14.01.01.00 General
|
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.05 EU law and national law
1.05.02 Implementation of EU law within the national legal system
1.05.02.00 General
|
|
|
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
2.05 Legal acts of the European Union
2.05.03 Directives
2.05.03.00 General
|
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.04 Fundamental rights
1.04.03 The fundamental rights
1.04.03.21 Non-discrimination
|
|
|
1 The legal order of the European Union
1.05 EU law and national law
1.05.02 Implementation of EU law within the national legal system
1.05.02.00 General
|
Citations of case-law or legislation
References in grounds of judgment
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 21
: paragraphs 1, 28, 77, 78, 85, 89
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 21
-P1 : paragraph 76
-
TFEU, Article 17
: paragraphs 32, 33
-
TFEU, Article 17
-P1 : paragraphs 29, 30
-
Directive 2000/78
: paragraphs 11, 20 - 22, 26, 31, 71, 74, 78
-
Directive 2000/78
-A01 : paragraphs 1, 4, 28, 35 - 37, 54, 63, 69, 75
-
Directive 2000/78
-A02 : paragraph 5
-
Directive 2000/78
-A02P1 : paragraph 37
-
Directive 2000/78
-A02P2 : paragraphs 35, 69
-
Directive 2000/78
-A02P2LA : paragraphs 1, 28, 37, 51
-
Directive 2000/78
-A02P5 : paragraphs 1, 28, 35, 52 - 56, 58, 61, 69
-
Directive 2000/78
-A07P1 : paragraphs 1, 6, 24, 27, 28, 35, 62, 64, 66, 69
-
Directive 2000/78
-A16 : paragraphs 7, 88
-
Directive 2000/78
-C24 : paragraphs 3, 32
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -476/99
-N39 : paragraph 65
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -104/09
-N33 : paragraph 64
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -447/09
-N55 : paragraph 54
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -447/09
-N56 : paragraph 55
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/14
-N89 : paragraph 42
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -157/15
-N28 : paragraph 58
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -188/15
-N30 : paragraph 58
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -406/15
-N66 : paragraph 79
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -406/15
-N67 : paragraph 80
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -406/15
-N68 : paragraph 81
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -143/16
-N25 : paragraph 43
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -414/16
-N57 : paragraph 32
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -414/16
-N58 : paragraph 33
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -414/16
-N71 : paragraph 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -414/16
-N75 : paragraph 75
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -414/16
-N76 : paragraph 76
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -414/16
-N77 : paragraph 77
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -451/16
-N42 : paragraph 42
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/16
-N28 : paragraph 88
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/16
-N30 : paragraph 88
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -569/16
-N76 : paragraph 72
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -68/17
-N48 : paragraphs 32, 33
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -68/17
-N63 : paragraph 74
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -68/17
-N67 : paragraph 75
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/17
-N44 : paragraph 73
Operative part
Opinion
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 21
: points 3, 14, 15
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 21
-P1 : points 4, 17, 18, 30, 37, 39, 57, 81, 87, 90, 91, 103, 105, 116 - 118, 122, 124 - 127, 129, 131, 132, 135, 136, 138, 139, 146, 150, 153, 172, 180, 185, 196 - 198
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 27
: point 124
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 31
-P2 : point 142
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47
: point 122
-
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52
-P1 : points 5, 32, 90, 92, 100
-
TFEU
: point 25
-
TFEU, Article 17
: points 19, 23
-
TFEU, Article 17
-P1 : points 20, 24 - 28
-
TFEU, Article 17
-P2 : point 28
-
TFEU, Article 288
: point 140
-
Directive 85/337
: point 137
-
Directive 2000/78
: points 3, 27, 102, 111, 116, 117, 120, 122, 125, 129, 142, 153, 180, 185
-
Directive 2000/78
-A01 : points 6, 15, 57, 197, 198
-
Directive 2000/78
-A02 : point 6
-
Directive 2000/78
-A02P2LA : points 15, 17, 30, 37, 39, 81, 87, 90, 196 - 198
-
Directive 2000/78
-A02P5 : points 15, 32, 88, 90, 92, 94, 100
-
Directive 2000/78
-A07 : point 6
-
Directive 2000/78
-A07P1 : points 15, 103, 105, 111, 113, 197, 198
-
Directive 2000/78
-C23 : point 91
-
Directive 2002/14
-A03P1 : points 123, 124
-
Directive 2003/88
: point 142
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -43/75
: point 166
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -43/75
-N40 : point 50
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -33/76
-N5 : point 151
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -45/76
-N13 : point 151
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -45/76
-N14 : point 151
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -45/76
-N15 : point 151
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -45/76
-N16 : point 151
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -14/83
: point 180
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -79/83
: point 166
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -179/84
-N17 : point 151
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -177/88
: points 166, 179
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -177/88
-N12 : point 58
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -177/88
-N17 : point 58
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -179/88
-N13 : point 58
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -184/89
-N18 : point 165
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/90
: points 116, 197, 198
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/90
-N45 : point 192
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -200/91
: point 166
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -91/92
-N20 : point 116
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -408/92
: point 166
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -28/93
: point 166
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -312/93
-N12 : point 151
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -446/93
-N32 : point 151
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -147/95
-N42 : point 165
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -409/95
-N31 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -54/96
-N40 : point 151
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -167/97
: point 160
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -453/99
-N27 : point 180
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -187/00
-N72 : point 165
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -320/00
: point 53
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -320/00
-N17 : points 50, 54
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -320/00
-N18 : point 54
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -442/00
-N42 : point 165
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -256/01
: point 53
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -256/01
-N45 : point 54
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -256/01
-N46 : point 54
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -320/01
-N39 : point 58
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -397/01
: point 119
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -397/01
-N108 : point 116
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -397/01
-N111 : point 150
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -144/04
: points 52, 120
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -144/04
-N77 : point 121
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -144/04
-N78 : point 121
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -222/05
-N28 : point 151
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -432/05
-N37 : point 150
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -432/05
-N43 : point 151
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -116/06
-N55 : point 58
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -231/06
-N39 : point 165
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -267/06
-N42 : point 66
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -267/06
-N72 : point 58
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -268/06
-N42 : point 150
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -54/07
-N40 : point 49
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -555/07
: points 52, 120, 142
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -555/07
-N43 : point 121
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -555/07
-N46 : point 116
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -555/07
-N51 : point 121
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -555/07
-N56 : point 128
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -73/08
-N55 : point 59
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -101/08
: point 143
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -147/08
-N42 : point 66
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -399/09
: point 158
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -399/09
-N51 : point 159
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -447/09
-N55 : point 91
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -447/09
-N56 : point 91
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -282/10
: point 144
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -176/12
-N79 : point 174
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -176/12
: point 123
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -176/12
-N47 : point 124
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -176/12
-N49 : point 124
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -176/12
-N50 : points 116, 192
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -267/12
-N31 : point 32
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -267/12
-N33 : point 66
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -267/12
-N46 : point 91
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -501/12
: point 158
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -501/12
-N95 : point 159
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -417/13
-N46 : point 165
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/14
-N91 : point 58
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -432/14
: point 58
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -432/14
-N31 : point 64
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -432/14
-N32 : points 40, 66
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -432/14
-N33 : point 64
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -432/14
-N38 : point 77
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -432/14
-N40 : point 59
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/14
-N27 : point 121
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/14
-N29 : point 128
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/14
-N35 : points 121, 128
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/14
-N36 : point 128
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/14
-N37 : point 128
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/14
-N41 : point 128
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/14
-N43 : point 121
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -157/15
-N32 : point 23
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -157/15
-N43 : point 80
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -188/15
: point 94
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -157/15
-N30 : point 58
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -188/15
-N32 : point 58
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -406/15
: point 158
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -406/15
-N67 : point 159
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -74/16
-N29 : point 24
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -74/16
-N30 : point 24
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -74/16
-N31 : point 24
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -74/16
-N32 : point 24
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -74/16
-N33 : point 24
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -143/16
-N20 : point 39
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -143/16
-N21 : point 39
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -143/16
-N22 : point 39
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -143/16
-N23 : point 39
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -143/16
-N24 : point 39
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -143/16
-N25 : point 39
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -143/16
-N26 : point 39
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -143/16
-N27 : point 39
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -143/16
-N28 : point 39
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -143/16
-N29 : point 39
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -143/16
-N30 : point 39
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -143/16
-N31 : point 39
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -143/16
-N32 : point 39
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -143/16
-N33 : point 39
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -143/16
-N34 : point 39
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -143/16
-N35 : point 39
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -143/16
-N36 : point 39
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -414/16
-N93 : point 22
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -414/16
-N95 : point 23
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -451/16
-N47 : point 74
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -569/16
: point 142
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -74/16
: point 24
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -143/16
: points 3, 52
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -143/16
-N16 : point 39
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -143/16
-N17 : point 39
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -143/16
-N18 : point 39
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -143/16
-N25 : points 40, 58, 73
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -143/16
-N26 : point 58
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -143/16
-N27 : point 58
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -143/16
-N28 : point 58
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -143/16
-N47 : point 39
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -190/16
-N29 : point 32
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -190/16
-N30 : point 32
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -190/16
-N31 : point 32
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -190/16
-N32 : point 58
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -190/16
-N33 : point 58
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -190/16
-N34 : point 58
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -190/16
-N44 : point 91
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -190/16
-N48 : point 97
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -414/16
: points 119, 120, 142
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -414/16
-N58 : point 22
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -414/16
-N68 : point 111
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -414/16
-N76 : point 122
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -414/16
-N79 : point 122
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -414/16
-N81 : point 122
-
Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/16
-N30 : point 165
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -167/17
-N33 : point 137
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -167/17
-N34 : point 137
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -167/17
-N35 : point 137
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -167/17
-N36 : point 137
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -167/17
-N37 : point 137
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -167/17
-N38 : point 137
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -167/17
-N39 : point 137
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -167/17
-N40 : point 137
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -167/17
-N41 : point 137
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -167/17
-N42 : point 137
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -167/17
-N43 : point 137
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -167/17
-N44 : point 137
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -167/17
-N45 : point 137
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -167/17
-N46 : point 137
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -167/17
-N47 : point 137
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -167/17
-N48 : point 137
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -167/17
-N49 : point 137
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -167/17
-N50 : point 137
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -167/17
-N51 : point 137
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -167/17
-N52 : point 137
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -167/17
-N53 : point 137
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -167/17
-N54 : point 137
-
Court of Justice - Opinion C -167/17
-N55 : point 137
Dates
Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings
Date of the Opinion
Date of the hearing
Information not available
Date of delivery
22/01/2019
References
Publication in the Official Journal
Judgment: OJ C 93 from 11.03.2019, p.6
Application: OJ C 283 from 28.08.2017, p.13
Name of the parties
Cresco Investigation
Notes on Academic Writings
- Van der Mei, A.P.: Goede vrijdag toeslag is directe discriminatie o.g.v. godsdienst, Tijdschrift Recht en Arbeid 2019 nº 11 p.33-34 (NL)
- Simon, Denys ; Rigaux, Anne: Discrimination liée à la religion, Europe 2019 Mars Comm. nº 3 p.18-19 (FR)
- Skubic, Zoran: Interdiction de la discrimination en vertu de l'appartenance religieuse et réglementation (encore) admissible des fêtes, Pravna praksa 2019 nº 14 p.28-29 (SL)
- Klocke, Kyra: Der EuGH und die unmittelbare Horizontalwirkung des Art. 21 GRCh, Betriebs-Berater 2019 p.1204-1209 (DE)
- Eleveld, A.: Rechtstreekse horizontale werking van grondrechten van de Europese Unie, Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2019 p.88-95 (NL)
- Eleveld, A.: Rechtstreekse horizontale werking van grondrechten van de Europese Unie, Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht 2019 N°3/4 p.88-95 (NL)
- Wattier, Stéphanie: Arrêt "Cresco Investigation": l'Autriche condamnée pour discrimination directe fondée sur la religion en raison d'un jour férié réservé aux chrétiens, Journal de droit européen 2019 nº 258 p.164-165 (FR)
- Holst-Christensen, Nina: Sag C-193/17 Cresco Investigation GmbH, EU-ret & Menneskeret 2019 nº 1 p.15-22 (DA)
- Pomahač, Richard: Soudní dvůr EU : Pracovní volno na Velký pátek, Právní rozhledy : časopis pro všechna právní odvětví 2019 p.189-190 (CS)
- Friedrich, Michael: Gleichbehandlung / Urlaubstage / Karfreitag, Zeitschrift für europäisches Sozial- und Arbeitsrecht 2019 p.340-349 (DE)
- Meij, A.W.H.: Nederlandse jurisprudentie ; Uitspraken in burgerlijke en strafzaken 2019 nº 42 p.5963-5965 (NL)
- Cuypers, D.: Zaak C-193/17, Cresco Investigation GmbH/Markus Achatzi, S.E.W. : Tijdschrift voor Europees en economisch recht 2019 p.417-421 (NL)
- Hentzschel, Lukas: Verstoβ gegen das unionsrechtliche Diskriminierungsverbot bei Privilegierung bestimmter bekenntnisgebundener Arbeitnehmer im Feiertagsrecht, Europäische Zeitschrift für Arbeitsrecht 2019 p.482-492 (DE)
- Kułak, Maciej: Skutek bezpośredni zasady niedyskryminacji w relacjach horyzontalnych, Europejski Przegląd Sądowy 2019 Vol. 6 p.33-37 (PL)
- Burger, Florian G.: OGH setzt Karfreitags-Urteil des EuGH um, Das Recht der Arbeit 2019 p.542-546 (DE)
- Jánošíková, Martina: Veľký piatok ako platený sviatok pre všetkých, Bulletin slovenskej advokácie 2019 n° 3 p. 47-49 (SL)
- Gennusa, Maria Elena: Un nuovo pezzo del puzzle: l’effetto diretto della Carta alla prova del caso Cresco, Quaderni costituzionali 2019, n° 2, p. 459-463 (IT)
- Polo Sabau, José Ramón: La sentencia del TJUE de 22 de enero de 2019 en el asunto CRESCO INVESTIGATION GmbH y MARKUS ACHATZI: una nueva muestra de la irrelevancia del art. 17 del Tratado de Funcionamiento de la Unión Europea, Revista General de Derecho Europeo 2020, nº 50, p. 242-261 (ES)
- Cecchetti, Lorenzo: Gli strumenti del giudizio di eguaglianza della Corte di giustizia alla prova del divieto di discriminazione sulla base della religione: il caso Cresco Investigation, Il diritto dell'Unione Europea 2020, n. 2, p. 317-360 (IT)
- Tinière, Romain: III. Droits fondamentaux - Cour de justice, gde ch., 22 janvier 2019, Cresco Investigation GmbH, aff. C-193/17, ECLI:EU:C:2019:43, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2019. Décisions et commentaires (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2020, p. 93-98 (FR)
Procedural Analysis Information
Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling
Oberster Gerichtshof - Austria
Subject-matter
- Social policy
- Principles, objectives and tasks of the Treaties
- Fundamental rights
- - Charter of Fundamental Rights
Provisions of national law referred to
Information not available
Provisions of international law referred to
Information not available
Procedure and result
- Reference for a preliminary ruling
Formation of the Court
grande chambre (Cour)
Judge-Rapporteur
Lycourgos
Advocate General
Bobek
Language(s) of the Case
Language(s) of the Opinion