Opinion of the Court (Full Court) of 18 December 2014

Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU

Opinion pursuant to Article 218(11) TFEU — Draft international agreement — Accession of the European Union to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms — Compatibility of the draft agreement with the EU and FEU Treaties

Case Opinion 2/13


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Opinion (OJ)
06/02/2015 Adhésion de l’Union à la CEDH
View pdf documents
Opinions of the Court
ECLI:EU:C:2014:2454
18/12/2014 Adhésion de l’Union à la CEDH
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Opinion (Summary)
ECLI:EU:C:2014:2454
18/12/2014 Adhésion de l’Union à la CEDH
View
ECLI:EU:C:2014:2475
13/06/2014 Adhésion de l’Union à la CEDH
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Opinion (OJ)
23/08/2013 Adhésion de l’Union à la CEDH
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Article 218 TFEU – Request for an opinion – Draft Agreement on the Accession of the European Union to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms – Draft declaration of the European Union to be made at the time of signing of the Agreement on Accession – Draft rules to be added to the Rules of the Committee of Ministers for the supervision of the execution of judgments and the terms of friendly settlements in cases to which the European Union is a party – Draft memorandum of the agreement between the European Union and a nonMember State of the European Union – Draft explanatory report on the Agreement on the Accession of the European Union to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms – Content, scheme, scope and effects of accession – Specific nature of the European Union legal order – Competencies of the European Union – Attribution of acts and omissions to the Union and its Member States – Notion of codefendant – Competence of the Court of Justice – Mechanism of prior involvement – Participation of the European Union in the bodies monitoring the Convention (European Court of Human Rights, Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe and the Committee of Ministers)

Systematic classification scheme

1.
6 External policy
  6.07 International agreements
    6.07.03 Prior opinion of the Court
1 The legal order of the European Union
  1.04 Fundamental rights
    1.04.01 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
      1.04.01.00 General
6 External policy
  6.07 International agreements
    6.07.03 Prior opinion of the Court
1 The legal order of the European Union
  1.04 Fundamental rights
    1.04.01 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
      1.04.01.00 General
1 The legal order of the European Union
  1.04 Fundamental rights
    1.04.02 Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
      1.04.02.02 Scope of the protection of rights and principles
        1.04.02.02.04 Level of protection (Article 53 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights)
6 External policy
  6.07 International agreements
    6.07.04 Effects, scope and limits
1 The legal order of the European Union
  1.03 Respective powers and obligations of the European Union and of the Member States
    1.03.03 Obligation of good faith
1 The legal order of the European Union
  1.04 Fundamental rights
    1.04.01 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
      1.04.01.00 General
6 External policy
  6.07 International agreements
    6.07.04 Effects, scope and limits
1 The legal order of the European Union
  1.03 Respective powers and obligations of the European Union and of the Member States
    1.03.01 Conferring of powers
1 The legal order of the European Union
  1.04 Fundamental rights
    1.04.01 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
      1.04.01.00 General
6 External policy
  6.07 International agreements
    6.07.04 Effects, scope and limits
1 The legal order of the European Union
  1.03 Respective powers and obligations of the European Union and of the Member States
    1.03.01 Conferring of powers
1 The legal order of the European Union
  1.04 Fundamental rights
    1.04.01 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
      1.04.01.00 General
6 External policy
  6.07 International agreements
    6.07.04 Effects, scope and limits
1 The legal order of the European Union
  1.04 Fundamental rights
    1.04.01 European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
      1.04.01.00 General
6 External policy
  6.01 Common foreign and security policy (CFSP)
    6.01.00 General
6 External policy
  6.07 International agreements
    6.07.04 Effects, scope and limits
6 External policy
  6.07 International agreements
    6.07.04 Effects, scope and limits


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

  • EC Treaty (Maastricht), Article 235 : paragraph 38
  • EU Treaty (Maastricht), Article F -P2 : paragraph 37
  • EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 308 -P1 : paragraph 38
  • Treaty of Lisbon 2007 : paragraph 40
  • Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007) : paragraph 39
  • Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52 -P3 : paragraph 44
  • Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 53 : paragraphs 45, 187, 189, 258
  • TFEU - Final Act, Declaration No 2 : paragraphs 43, 162
  • TFEU, Article 6 : paragraphs 40, 153
  • TFEU, Article 40 : paragraph 249
  • TFEU, Article 216 -P2 : paragraph 180
  • TFEU, Article 218 -P11 : paragraph 145
  • TFEU, Article 218 -P6L2LAPT2 : paragraph 41
  • TFEU, Article 218 -P8 : paragraph 41
  • TFEU, Article 263 -L4 : paragraph 250
  • TFEU, Article 267 : paragraphs 176, 196 - 199, 258
  • TFEU, Article 275 -L2 : paragraph 249
  • TFEU, Article 344 : paragraphs 161, 201, 203, 208, 210, 212 - 214
  • TFEU, Article 352 -P1 : paragraph 38
  • TFEU - Protocol No 8 : paragraphs 42, 161, 258
  • TFEU - Protocol No 8 -A01LB : paragraphs 211, 216
  • TFEU - Protocol No 8 -A03 : paragraph 203
  • TEU, Article 1 -L2 : paragraph 167
  • TEU, Article 2 : paragraph 168
  • TEU, Article 3 : paragraph 172
  • TEU, Article 4 -P1 : paragraph 165
  • TEU, Article 4 -P3 : paragraph 202
  • TEU, Article 4 -P3L1 : paragraph 173
  • TEU, Article 5 -P1 : paragraph 165
  • TEU, Article 5 -P2 : paragraph 165
  • TEU, Article 6 -P1 : paragraph 169
  • TEU, Article 6 -P2 : paragraphs 37, 160, 258
  • TEU, Article 6 -P3 : paragraph 179
  • TEU, Article 13 : paragraph 165
  • TEU, Article 14 : paragraph 165
  • TEU, Article 15 : paragraph 165
  • TEU, Article 16 : paragraph 165
  • TEU, Article 17 : paragraph 165
  • TEU, Article 18 : paragraph 165
  • TEU, Article 19 : paragraph 165
  • TEU, Article 19 -P1L1 : paragraph 163
  • TEU, Article 51 : paragraph 42
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -26/62 : paragraphs 157, 166, 176
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/64 : paragraphs 157, 166
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -11/70 : paragraphs 37, 166, 170
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -4/73 : paragraph 37
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -181/73 : paragraph 180
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -294/83 : paragraph 163
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -260/89 : paragraphs 37, 169
  • Court of Justice - Opinion 1/91 : paragraphs 166, 180, 182, 184, 201
  • Court of Justice - Opinion 2/94 : paragraphs 38, 145, 147, 153
  • Court of Justice - Opinion 3/94 : paragraph 146
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -299/95 : paragraph 169
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -112/00 : paragraph 169
  • Court of Justice - Opinion 1/00 : paragraphs 183, 184, 201
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -459/03 : paragraphs 201, 202, 205
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -540/03 : paragraph 39
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -344/04 : paragraph 180
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -402/05 : paragraphs 37, 169, 170, 183, 201
  • Court of Justice - Opinion 1/08 : paragraph 145
  • Court of Justice - Opinion 1/09 : paragraphs 145 - 147, 157, 166, 173, 175, 176, 182, 183, 256
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -366/10 : paragraph 180
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -411/10 : paragraph 191
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -571/10 : paragraph 179
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10 : paragraphs 171, 179
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -399/11 : paragraphs 166, 188, 191

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion

  • Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 41 -P1 : point 153
  • Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47 -P2 : point 153
  • Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51 -P1 : points 254, 267
  • Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51 -P2 : point 34
  • Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 52 -P3 : points 42, 58, 86, 203, 205
  • TFEU - Protocol No 3 -A44 : point 81
  • TFEU, Article 3 -P2 : point 54
  • TFEU, Article 101 : points 146, 147
  • TFEU, Article 102 : points 146, 147
  • TFEU, Article 216 -P1 : point 54
  • TFEU, Article 216 -P2 : points 40, 201, 257, 269
  • TFEU, Article 218 -P8L2 : points 36, 53
  • TFEU, Article 218 -P11 : points 17, 18
  • TFEU, Article 263 : points 70, 79
  • TFEU, Article 263 -L1 : points 68, 86
  • TFEU, Article 263 -L4 : point 84
  • TFEU, Article 267 : points 30, 70, 79, 89
  • TFEU, Article 267 -L1 : point 68
  • TFEU, Article 267 -P3 : point 141
  • TFEU, Article 274 : points 99, 188
  • TFEU, Article 275 : points 91, 95
  • TFEU, Article 275 -L2 : points 84, 86 - 89, 99, 101, 103, 189, 195
  • TFEU, Article 281 -L1 : point 76
  • TFEU, Article 281 -L2 : points 74, 75, 81
  • TFEU, Article 344 : points 107, 113 - 121
  • TEU, Article 6 : point 12
  • TEU, Article 6 -P2 : points 3, 33, 35, 38, 41 - 45, 52, 54, 73, 188, 278
  • TEU, Article 6 -P3 : points 42, 205
  • TEU, Article 13 -P2 : point 22
  • TEU, Article 19 -P1 : points 64, 66, 82, 96, 106
  • TEU, Article 19 -P3 : points 66, 76
  • TEU, Article 24 -P1 : point 99
  • TEU, Article 26 -P3 : point 98
  • TEU, Article 40 : point 87
  • TEU, Article 42 -P3 : point 98
  • TEU, Article 44 -P1 : point 98
  • TEU, Article 48 : point 35
  • TEU, Article 51 : point 76
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -26/62 : point 159
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/64 : point 159
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -11/70 : point 159
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/70 : point 54
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -181/73 : points 54, 110, 139, 198
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -44/79 : point 42
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -283/81 : points 30, 184
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -294/83 : points 92, 93
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -222/84 : point 42
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -314/85 : points 100, 101, 121
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -374/87 : point 130
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -70/88 : point 22
  • Court of Justice - Opinion 1/91 : points 106, 107, 159, 166, 172, 192
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -199/92 : point 149
  • Court of Justice - Opinion 1/92 : points 65, 159, 172, 192, 279
  • Court of Justice - Opinion 2/94 : points 2, 17-19, 35, 46
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -185/95 : point 154
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/99 : point 254
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -50/00 : point 97
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -112/00 : point 206
  • Court of Justice - Opinion 1/00 : points 67, 71, 121, 159, 172
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -36/02 : point 206
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -459/03 : points 106, 107, 118
  • Court of Justice - Opinion 1/03 : point 54
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -354/04 : points 96, 100
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -105/04 : point 154
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -113/04 : point 154
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -289/04 : point 254
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -344/04 : points 54, 110, 198
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -354/04 : points 92, 94, 97
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -355/04 : points 92, 94, 97
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -305/05 : point 130
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -341/05 : point 206
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -402/05 : points 36, 42, 92, 106, 171, 204
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -438/05 : point 206
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -280/06 : point 149
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -133/06 : point 22
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -244/06 : point 206
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -275/06 : point 130
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -301/06 : point 182
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -385/07 : point 154
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -386/08 : point 139
  • Court of Justice - Opinion 1/08 : point 17
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -336/09 : point 92
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -550/09 : point 92
  • Court of Justice - Opinion 1/09 : points 17, 18, 21, 22, 65, 96, 159, 166, 197
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -17/10 : points 149, 152
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -109/10 : point 154
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -110/10 : point 154
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -17/10 : point 149
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -366/10 : points 54, 110
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -386/10 : point 150
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -411/10 : point 130
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -501/11 : point 150
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -583/11 : points 90, 91
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -681/11 : point 149
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -199/11 : point 150
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -501/11 : points 149, 150
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/11 : points 90, 92, 96, 97
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -425/12 : point 91
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -40/12 : points 154, 155
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/12 : points 154, 155
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -293/12 : points 182, 206
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12 : point 90
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -427/12 : point 90


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 04/07/2013

Date of the Opinion

  • 13/06/2014

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

18/12/2014


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Opinion: OJ C 65 from 23.02.2015, p.2

Application: OJ C 260 from 07.09.2013, p.19

Name of the parties

Adhésion de l’Union à la CEDH

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Sauron, Jean-Luc: L’avis 2/13 de la Cour de justice de l’Union européenne : la fin d’une idée anachronique ?, Gazette du Palais 2014 nº I Jur. p.4-6 (FR)
  2. Jacqué, Jean-Paul: CJUE - CEDH : 2-0, Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 2014 p.823-831 (FR)
  3. Vial, Claire: Cour de justice, ass. plén., 18 décembre 2014, avis 2/13, ECLI:EU:C:2014:2454, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2014 (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2014 p.146-148 (FR)
  4. Ackermann (et al.), Thomas: Editorial comments: The EU's Accession to ECHR - a "NO" from ECJ!, Common Market Law Review 2015 p.1-15 (EN)
  5. Weber, Marlen: Vereinbarkeit des EMRK-Beitritts der EU mit dem Unionsrecht, Newsletter Menschenrechte 2015 nº 1 p.3-11 (DE)
  6. Tomuschat, Christian: Der Streit um die Auslegungshoheit: Die Autonomie der EU als Heiliger Gral / Das EuGH-Gutachten gegen den Beitritt der EU zur EMRK, Europäische Grundrechte-Zeitschrift 2015 p.133-139 (DE)
  7. Wendel, Mattias: Der EMRK-Beitritt als Unionsrechtsverstoß - Zur völkerrechtlichen Öffnung der EU und ihren Grenzen, Neue juristische Wochenschrift 2015 p.921-926 (DE)
  8. Bechtold, Rainer: Hat Luxemburg Angst vor Straßburg?, Neue Zeitschrift für Kartellrecht 2015 p.161-162 (DE)
  9. Lambrecht, Sarah : The Sting is in the Tail: CJEU Opinion 2/13 objects to draft agreement on accession of the EU to the European Convention on Human Rights, European Human Rights Law Review 2015 p.185-198 (EN)
  10. Thym, Daniel: Das EMRK-Gutachten des EuGH, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2015 p.180 (DE)
  11. Grabenwarter, Christoph: Das EMRK-Gutachten des EuGH, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2015 p.180 (DE)
  12. Petite, Michel: The battle over Strasbourg: The protection of human rights across Europe has suffered a setback, thanks to the Court of Justice of the European Union, Competition Law Insight 2015 Vol. 14 Issue 2 p.10-11 (EN)
  13. Wessel, Ramses A. ; Lazowski, Adam: Tijd voor externe controle op de mensenrechten binnen de Europese Unie? De (niet-)toetreding van de EU tot het EVRM, Ars aequi 2015 p.674-677 (NL)
  14. Nanopoulos , Eva: Killing two Birds with one Stone? The Court of Justice's Opinion on the EU's Accession to the ECHR, The Cambridge Law Journal 2015 p.185-188 (EN)
  15. Spaventa, Eleanor: A Very Fearful Court? The Protection of Fundamental Rights in the European Union after Opinion 2/13, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 2015 p.35-56 (EN)
  16. Bezemek, Christoph: 19 Jahre, und nichts für die Unsterblichkeit getan, Zeitschrift für Europarecht, internationales Privatrecht und Rechtsvergleichung 2015 p.51-58 (DE)
  17. Lengauer, Alina: Beitritt der EU zur EMRK, Zeitschrift für Europarecht, internationales Privatrecht und Rechtsvergleichung 2015 p.100-105 (DE)
  18. Bausback, Winfried: Wer hat Angst vor dem EGMR?, Zeitschrift für Rechtspolitik 2015 p.97 (DE)
  19. Gragl, Paul: The Reasonableness of Jealousy: Opinion 2/13 and EU Accession to the ECHR, European Yearbook on Human Rights (Ed. Intersentia - Antwerp) 2015 p.27-49 (EN)
  20. Steiner, Elisabeth ; Rătescu, Iona: The Long Way to Strasbourg - The Impact of the CJEU's Opinion on the EU's Accession to the ECHR, European Yearbook on Human Rights (Ed. Intersentia - Antwerp) 2015 p.51-60 (EN)
  21. Berger, Maria ; Rauchegger, Clara: Opinion 2/13: Multiple Obstacles to the Accession of the EU to the ECHR, European Yearbook on Human Rights (Ed. Intersentia - Antwerp) 2015 p.61-75 (EN)
  22. De Witte, Bruno ; Imamović , Šejla: Opinion 2/13 on Accession to the ECHR: Defending the EU Legal Order against a Foreign Human Rights Court, European Law Review 2015 p.683-705 (EN)
  23. Odermatt, Jed: A Giant Step Backwards? Opinion 2/13 on the EU's Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights, Journal of International Law and Politics 2015 p.783-797 (EN)
  24. Mazilu-Babel, Mihaela: Opinion 2/13: the Intermundia of Two Transnational Courts and the Procedure That is Yet to Connect Them, European Law Reporter 2015 p.162-171 (DE, EN)
  25. Vandamme, T.A.J.A.: Advies 2/13 en de constitutionele identiteit van de EU, S.E.W. ; Sociaal-economische wetgeving 2015 p.616-627 (NL)
  26. Prevedourou, Evgenia V.: Provlimata symvatotitas tou schediou symfonias gia tin proschorisi tis EE stin ESDA: i gnomodotisi DEE 2/13 tis 18.12.2014, To Syntagma 2015 p.127-154 (EL)
  27. Di Comite, Valeria: Autonomia o controllo esterno? Il dilemma dell'adesione dell'UE alla CEDU alla luce del parere 2/13, La Comunità internazionale 2015 p.223-243 (IT)
  28. González Vaqué, Luis: El acuerdo de adhésión de la UE al Convenio europeo para la protección de los derechos humanos y de las libertades fundamentales: análisis de la motivación del TJUE para la declaración de su (in) compatibilidad con el direcho comunitario, Revista Aranzadi Unión Europea 2015 nº8-9 p.31-49 (ES)
  29. Urbina Treviño, Gonzalo: El TJUE rechaza el proyecto de acuerdo de adhésión de la Unión europea al Convenio europeo de drechos humanos: dictamen 2/13 del Tribunal de justicia (pleno), de 18 de Dciembre de 2014, Revista Aranzadi Unión Europea 2015 nº8-9 p.51-66 (ES)
  30. Cortés Martín, José Manuel: Sobre el dictamen del TJUE n°2/13, relativo a la adhesión al CEDH, la tutela judicial efectiva en la PESC y la unión de drecho, Revista Aranzadi Unión Europea 2015 nº8-9 p.67-92 (ES)
  31. Hojnik, Janja: Ročna zavora Sodišča EU pri pristopanju EU k EKČP, Pravna praksa 2015 nº 1 p.13-14 (SL)
  32. Martín y Pérez de Nanclares, José: El TJUE pierde el rumbo en el dictamen 2/13: merece todavía la pena la adhesión de la UE al CEDH?, Revista de Derecho Comunitario Europeo 2015 nº 52 p.825-869 (ES)
  33. Schorkopf, Frank: Juristenzeitung 2015 p.781-784 (DE)
  34. Pirker, Benedikt ; Reitemeyer, Stefan: Between Discursive and Exclusive Autonomy – Opinion 2/13, the Protection of Fundamental Rights and the Autonomy of EU Law, Cambridge yearbook of European legal studies (Ed. Cambridge University Press - Cambridge) 2015 p. 168-188 (EN)
  35. Åhman, Karin: Tjugo år av Europakonventionen som svensk lag - Några reflektioner, Europarättslig tidskrift 2015 Nr 1 p.39-46 (SV)
  36. Caunes, Karine: La protection des droits fondamentaux dans l’Union européenne, ERA-Forum : scripta iuris europaei 2015 p.459-466 (FR)
  37. Mole, Nuala: Can Bosphorus be maintained?, ERA-Forum : scripta iuris europaei 2015 p.467-480 (EN, FR)
  38. Plaza Garcia, Paloma: Accession of the EU to the ECHR: issues raised with regard to EU acts on CFSP matters, ERA-Forum : scripta iuris europaei 2015 p.481-494 (EN, FR)
  39. Niedźwiedź, Monika: Ochrona prawna y obszarze Wspólnej Polityki Zagranicznej i Bezpieczeństwa UE – rozważania w świetle opinii Trybunału Sprawiedliwości 2/13 z 18.12.2014 r. (cz. I), Europejski Przegląd Sądowy 2015 Vol. 8 p.4-11 (PL)
  40. Lock, Tobias: The future of the European Union's accession to the European Convention on Human Rights after Opinion 2/13: is it still possible and is it still desirable?, European Constitutional Law Review 2015 Vol. 11 p.239-273 (EN)
  41. Azpitarte Sánchez, Miguel: Los derechos fundamentales de la Unión en busca de un nuevo equlibrio, Revista española de Derecho Constitucional 2015 n°104 p. 243-268 (ES)
  42. Gennusa, Maria Elena: Difesa di posizioni nel parere della Corte di giustizia sull'adesione dell'Unione alla CEDU ?, Quaderni costituzionali 2015 p.189-192 (IT)
  43. Guazzarotti, Andrea: Il parere della Corte di giustizia sull'adesione dell'Unione alla CEDU e la crisi dell'euro : due facce della stessa medaglia ?, Quaderni costituzionali 2015 p.192-196 (IT)
  44. Breuer, Marten: „Wasch mir den Pelz, aber mach mich nicht nass!“ Das zweite Gutachten des EuGH zum EMRK-Beitritt der Europäischen Union, Europarecht 2015 Heft 3 p.330-350 (DE)
  45. Besson, Samantha: L' adhésion de l'Union européenne à la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme après l' avis 2/13, Schweizerisches Jahrbuch für Europarecht = Annuaire suisse de droit européen (Stämpfli Verlag AG-Bern 2015, Stämpfli Editions SA-Berne 2015) 2015 p.423-454 (FR)
  46. Benoit-Rohmer, Florence: À propos de l'avis 2/13 de la Cour de Justice, Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 2015 Juillet-Septembre n°3 p.593-611 (FR)
  47. Kamenova, Tsvetana: За становище 2/13 от 18 декембри 2014 г. на съда на Европейския съюз, Правна мисъл 2015 n° 3 p.113-117 (BG)
  48. Wróbel, Andrzej: Dekalog akcesyjny, czyli dziesięć argumentów Trybunału Sprawiedliwości przeciwko przystąpieniu Unii Europejskiej do Europejskiej Konwencji Praw Człowieka, Europejski Przegląd Sądowy 2015 Vol. 12 p.4-7 (PL)
  49. Kowalik-Bańczyk, Krystyna: Autonomia prawa unijnego w świetle opinii 2/13, Europejski Przegląd Sądowy 2015 Vol. 12 p.14-20 (PL)
  50. Łazowski, Adam: Opinia 2/13 a wzrost znaczenia Karty Praw Podstawowych UE, Europejski Przegląd Sądowy 2015 Vol. 12 p.21-27 (PL)
  51. Malenovský, Jiří: Comment tirer parti de l'avis 2/13 de la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne sur l'adhésion à la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme, Revue générale de droit international public 2015 n° 4 p.705-742 (FR)
  52. Bercea, Raluca: Le temps de l'adhésion n'est toujours pas venu - notes en marge de l'Avis 2/13 du 18 décembre 2014 de la Cour de Justice de l'Union Européenne, Romanian Journal of Comparative Law 2015 1 p.88-103 (FR)
  53. Ruiz-Miguel, Carlos: Les droits fondamentaux au carrefour de la Cour européenne des droits de l'homme et de la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne, Cahiers de la recherche sur les droits fondamentaux 2015 n° 13 p.121-135 (FR)
  54. Picod, Fabrice: La Cour de justice a dit non a I’adhésion de I’Union européenne a Ia Convention EDH, La Semaine Juridique - édition générale 2015 nº 6 p.230-234 (FR)
  55. Picod, Fabrice: La Cour de justice a dit non à l'adhésion de l'Union européenne à la Convention EDH - Le mieux est l'ennemi du bien, selon les sages du plateau du Kirchberg, La Semaine Juridique - édition générale 2015 nº 6 p.230-234 (FR)
  56. Labayle, Henri ; Sudre, Frédéric: L'avis 2/13 de la Cour de justice sur l'adhésion de l'Union européenne à la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme : pavane pour une adhésion défunte ?, Revue française de droit administratif 2015 p.3-20 (FR)
  57. Broussy, Emmanuelle ; Cassagnabère, Hervé ; Gänser, Christian: Adhésion de l'Union européenne à la convention européenne des droits de l'homme, L'actualité juridique ; droit administratif 2015 p.338 (FR)
  58. Gaudin, Hélène: Si proches, si lointaines ..., L'actualité juridique ; droit administratif 2015 p.1079-1085 (FR)
  59. Chaltiel, Florence: L'adhésion de l'Union européenne à la Convention européenne est-elle impossible ?, Petites affiches. La Loi / Le Quotidien juridique 2015 nº 105 p.6-13 (FR)
  60. Perego, A.: Projet d'adhésion de l'Union européenne à la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme, Revue du droit de l'Union européenne 2015 nº 1 p.145-150 (FR)
  61. Brenčič, Marek: Nekonečný príbeh? Pristúpenie Európskej únie k Dohovoru Rady Európy o ochrane ľudských práv a základných slobôd, Justičná revue 2015 nº 6-7 p.843-856 (SK)
  62. Kneihs, Benjamin: Der (Nicht-)Beitritt der Union zur EMRK und seine Konsequenzen für Österreich in der Union, 20 Jahre EU-Mitgliedschaft Österreichs (Ed. Verlag Österreich - Wien) 2015 p.257-289 (DE)
  63. Walkila, Sonya: "Luxembourg vs. Strasbourg" - Oikeusministeriön lainsäädäntöneuvos Sonya Walkila kommentoi Euroopan unionin tuomioistuimen lausuntoa 2/13, jossa tuomioistuin torjuu EU:n liittymisen Euroopan ihmisoikeussopimukseen, Helsinki Law Review 2015 nº 1 p.25-28 (FI)
  64. Bárd, Petra: Az EU csatlakozása az emberi jogok európai egyezményéhez, Fundamentum : az emberijogok folyóirata 2015 4. szám p.18-38 (HU)
  65. Vezzani, Simone: L'autonomia dell'ordinamento giuridico dell'Unione Europea. Riflessioni all'indomani del parere 2/13 della Corte di giustizia, Rivista di diritto internazionale 2016 p.68-116 (IT)
  66. Andreangeli, Arianna: Competition Law and the Opinion 2.13 on the Accession of the EU to the European Convention on Human Rights: Back to Square one?, Journal of European Competition Law & Practice 2015 Vol. 6 nº 8 p.583-585 (EN)
  67. Korenica, Fisnik ; Doli, Dren: A View on CJEU Opinion 2/13’s Unclear Stance on and Dislike of Protocol 16 ECHR, European Public Law 2016 p.269-286 (EN)
  68. Douglas-Scott, Sionaidh: Autonomy and Fundamental Rights: The ECJ's Opinion 2/13 on Accession of the EU to the ECHR, Europarättslig tidskrift 2016 nº 1 (Ulf Bernitz 80) p.29-44 (EN)
  69. Halberstam, Daniel: Introductory Note To Opinion 2/13 of the Court, International Legal Materials 2016 p.267-269 (EN)
  70. Krommendijk, Jasper: Toenemende Alleingang?, Asiel en Migrantenrecht 2016 p.356-361 (NL)
  71. Sozański, Jarosław: Glosa do opinii TS z dnia 18 grudnia 2014 r., 2/13., Państwo i Prawo 2016 Vol. 8 p.122-129 (PL)
  72. Haguenau-Moizard, Catherine: Identité constitutionnelle et mandat d'arrêt européen : l’exploitation de la jurisprudence Melloni par la Cour constitutionnelle allemande, Europe 2016 Mars Comm. nº 3 p.37-42 (FR)
  73. Perillo, Ezio: Adhésion à la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme, deux ans plus tard, Journal de droit européen 2016 nº 234 p.377 (FR)
  74. Toda Castán, Daniel: Die Öffnung des EU-Rechts für die Europäische Menschenrechtskonvention, Die öffentliche Verwaltung 2016 p.12-22 (DE)
  75. Butler, Graham: The Ultimate Stumbling Block? The Common Foreign and Security Policy and Accession of the European Union to the European Convention on Human Rights, Dublin University Law Journal 2016 p.229-244 (EN)
  76. O'Leary, Siofra: Courts, charters and conventions: making sense of fundamental rights in the EU, The Irish Jurist 2016 p.4-41 (EN)
  77. Hwang, Shu-Perng: Grundrechtsoptimierung unter dem Vorbehalt des unionsrechtlichen Vorrangs? Zur Auslegung des Art. 53 GRCh im Lichte des Vorrangs des Unionsrechts, Zeitschrift für Europarechtliche Studien - ZEuS 2016 p.369-388 (DE)
  78. Łukańko, Bernard: Diskriminierung wegen sexueller Orientierung versus Sicherheit der Blutspende, „Sexuelle Orientierung‘‘ als Diskriminierungsgrund: Regelungsbedarf in Deutschland und Polen? (Ed. Mohr Siebeck - Tübingen) 2016 p.41-52 (DE)
  79. Pellegrini, Daniele: L’adesione dell’Unione europea alla CEDU oltre il parere 2/13 CGUE, federalismi.it 2016, 31 P. (IT)
  80. Korenica, Fisnik ; Doli, Dren: The CJEU likes to blame loudly and to applaud quietly: the co-respondent mechanism in the light of opinion 2/13, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 2017 p.86-107 (EN)
  81. Hummer, Waldemar: Ein Justamentsstandpunkt des Gerichtshofs der EU ?, Die Europäische Union — das unbekannte Wesen. (Ed. Österreich GmbH - Wien) 2017 p. 126-127 (DE)
  82. Wolber, Johannes: Der Beitritt der Europäischen Union zur EMRK im Lichte des Europäischen Zivilprozessrechts, Zeitschrift für europäisches Privatrecht 2017 p.936-952 (DE)
  83. Pecin, Suzana: Razvoj prava človekovih pravic v Evropski uniji s posebnim poudarkom na sodni praksi Sodišča Evropske unije, Pravnik : revija za pravno teorijo in prakso 2017 nº 9-20 p.653-682 (SL)
  84. Simon, Denys: Indépendance des juges, Europe 2018 avril nº 4 p.11-12 (FR)
  85. Potvin-Solis, Laurence: L'avis 2/13 de la Cour de justice : quand concurrence rime avec dialogue des juges dans la garantie européenne des droits fondamentaux, La concurrence des juges en Europe (Ed.Clément Juglar, Paris) 2018 p.409-428 (FR)
  86. Von Danwitz, Thomas: La protection des droits fondamentaux dans l'ordre juridique de l'Union sur le fondement de l'Avis 2/13, Liber Amicorum Antonio Tizzano. De la Cour CECA à la Cour de l'Union: le long parcours de la justice européenne (G. Giappichelli Editore) 2018 p. 1020-1029 (FR)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

    Information not available

    Procedure and result

    • Opinion procedure : non-conformity with the Treaty (opinions or rulings)

    Formation of the Court

    assemblée plénière (Cour)

    Judge-Rapporteur

    Tizzano

    Advocate General

    Kokott

    Language(s) of the Case

    • French, German, English, Bulgarian, Danish, Spanish, Estonian, Finnish, Greek, Hungarian, Italian, Lithuanian, Latvian, Maltese, Dutch, Polish, Portuguese, Romanian, Slovak, Slovene, Swedish, Czech

    Language(s) of the Opinion

    • German