Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 15 June 2017

Saale Kareda v Stefan Benkö

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EU) No 1215/2012 — Article 7(1) — Concepts of ‘matters relating to a contract’ and of a ‘contract for the provision of services’ — Recourse claim between jointly and severally liable debtors under a credit agreement — Determination of the place of performance of the credit agreement

Case C-249/16


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment (OJ)
04/08/2017 Kareda
View pdf documents
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2017:472
15/06/2017 Kareda
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment (Summary)
ECLI:EU:C:2017:472
15/06/2017 Kareda
Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:2017:305
26/04/2017 Kareda
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Application (OJ)
05/08/2016 Kareda
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
      4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
      4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
      4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

  • Regulation 44/2001 -A05PT1 : paragraphs 8, 27, 28
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A05PT1LB : paragraphs 29, 35
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A15 : paragraphs 11, 45
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A16 : paragraphs 11, 45
  • Regulation 593/2008 -A15 : paragraph 13
  • Regulation 593/2008 -A16 : paragraphs 14, 33
  • Regulation 593/2008 -C17 : paragraph 12
  • Regulation 593/2008 -C7 : paragraph 12
  • Regulation 1215/2012 : paragraphs 31, 32
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A04P1 : paragraph 6
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A07 : paragraph 7
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A07PT1 : paragraphs 1, 8, 27 - 28, 33
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A07PT1LA : paragraph 25
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A07PT1LB : paragraph 35
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A07PT1LBT2 : paragraphs 25, 34, 37 - 39, 42, 44, 46
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A07PT1LC : paragraph 25
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A17 : paragraphs 11, 45
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A17P1 : paragraph 9
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A18 : paragraphs 11, 45
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A18P1 : paragraph 10
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A18P2 : paragraph 10
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -C15 : paragraphs 4, 44
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -C16 : paragraphs 4, 44
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -C4 : paragraph 3
  • Brussels Convention 1968 -A05PT1 : paragraphs 8, 28
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -14/76 -N16 : paragraph 30
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -14/76 -N17 : paragraph 30
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -9/87 -N13 : paragraph 30
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -204/08 -N33 : paragraph 29
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -419/11 -N45 : paragraph 28
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -419/11 -N46 : paragraph 28
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -419/11 -N47 : paragraph 28
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -147/12 -N28 : paragraph 27
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -508/12 -N34 : paragraph 45
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -45/13 -N19 : paragraph 32
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -375/13 -N37 : paragraph 28
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -375/13 -N39 : paragraph 28
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -359/14 -N43 : paragraph 32
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -185/15 -N38 : paragraph 31
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/15 -N33 : paragraph 40
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/15 -N37 : paragraph 35
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -249/16 : paragraphs 31, 36, 41

Operative part

  • Interprets : Regulation 1215/2012 -A07PT1
  • Interprets : Regulation 1215/2012 -A07PT1LBT2

Opinion

  • Regulation 44/2001 -A05PT1 : point 42
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A63P1 : point 42
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A63P3 : point 42
  • Directive 2002/65 -A02LB : points 11, 41
  • Regulation 593/2008 : point 33
  • Regulation 593/2008 -A16 : points 10, 32
  • Regulation 593/2008 -C7 : point 9
  • Regulation 593/2008 -C17 : point 9
  • Regulation 1215/2012 : points 1, 26, 31, 33
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A04P1 : point 7
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A07 : point 8
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A07PT1 : points 3, 35, 42, 48
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A07PT1LA : point 25
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A07PT1LB : point 42
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A07PT1LBT2 : points 4, 25, 37, 43, 44, 46 - 48
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A07PT1LC : point 25
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -C4 : point 5
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -C15 : point 6
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -C16 : point 6
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -533/07 -N29 : point 39
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -533/07 -N30 : point 39
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -533/07 -N31 : point 39
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -9/12 -N30 : point 46
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -9/12 -N31 : point 46
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -9/12 -N32 : point 46
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -9/12 -N39 : point 46
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -359/14 -N40 : point 33
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -185/15 -N38 : point 31
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/15 -N33 : point 44
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/15 -N37 : point 39
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -196/15 -N38 : point 39


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 02/05/2016

Date of the Opinion

  • 26/04/2017

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

15/06/2017


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 277 from 21.08.2017, p.16

Application: OJ C 305 from 22.08.2016, p.12

Name of the parties

Kareda

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Mankowski, Peter: Zur internationalen Zuständigkeit für Prozess zwischen den Gesamtschuldnern eines mit einem Kreditinstitut geschlossenen Kreditvertrags (‚‚Kareda‘‘). EuGVVO Art. 7 Nr. 1, Entscheidungen zum Wirtschaftsrecht 2017 p.577-578 (DE)
  2. Nourissat, Cyril: Action récursoire entre codébiteurs d'un contrat de crédit, Procédures 2017 nº 8-9 p.17 (FR)
  3. Idot, Laurence: Matière contractuelle et action récursoire, Europe 2017 Août Comm. nº 334 p.43-44 (FR)
  4. Idot, Laurence: Compétence en matière délictuelle, Europe 2017 décembre nº 12 p.45-46 (FR)
  5. Slonina, Michael: Erfüllungsortsgerichtsstand am Bankensitz für Regressklage unter privaten Kreditnehmern?, Ecolex 2018 p.136-139 (DE)
  6. Pailler, Ludovic: Coopération judiciaire en matière civile et commerciale, Journal du droit international 2018 n° 2 p.592-601 (FR)
  7. Paulus, David: Anmerkung zu EuGH v. 15.6.2017 - Rs. C-249 /16 - Kareda, Zeitschrift für das Privatrecht der Europäischen Union - GPR 2018 n° 02 p.80-82 (DE)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Oberster Gerichtshof - Austria

Subject-matter

  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - Judicial cooperation in civil matters

Provisions of national law referred to

AT - Allgemeines Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, ABGB, Paragraphen 1042, 896, 905 (2), 907a

Allgemeines bürgerliches Gesetzbuch für die gesamten deutschen Erbländer der Oesterreichischen Monarchie (Allgemeines Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch - ABGB), ABGB, Paragraphen 1042, 896, 905 (2), 907a

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Reference for a preliminary ruling
  • Reference for a preliminary ruling : case not proceeding to judgment

Formation of the Court

troisième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Safjan

Advocate General

Bot

Language(s) of the Case

  • German

Language(s) of the Opinion

  • French