Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 21 March 2019

Rhein-Sieg-Kreis v Verkehrsbetrieb Hüttebräucker GmbH and BVR Busverkehr Rheinland GmbH and Rhenus Veniro GmbH & Co. KG v Kreis Heinsberg

Requests for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Transport — Public passenger transport services by rail and by road — Regulation (EC) No 1370/2007 — Article 5(1) and (2) — Direct award – Contracts for public passenger transport services by bus and tram — Conditions — Directive 2004/17/EC — Directive 2004/18/EC

Joined Cases C-266/17 and C-267/17


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2019:241
21/03/2019 Verkehrsbetrieb Hüttebräucker and BVR Busverkehr Rheinland
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:2018:723
13/09/2018 Verkehrsbetrieb Hüttebräucker and BVR Busverkehr Rheinland
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Application (OJ)
11/08/2017 Verkehrsbetrieb Hüttebräucker and BVR Busverkehr Rheinland
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Information not available


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

  • Regulation 1370/2007 -A02LB
  • Regulation 1370/2007 -A02LC
  • Regulation 1370/2007 -A05P1L1
  • Regulation 1370/2007 -A05P2L2LB
  • Regulation 1370/2007 -A08P3
  • Regulation 1191/69
  • Directive 2004/17
  • Regulation 1107/70

Operative part

  • Interprets : Directive 2004/17
  • Interprets : Directive 2004/18
  • Interprets : Regulation 1370/2007 -A05P2

Opinion

  • Directive 2004/14 : point 16
  • Directive 2004/17 : points 26, 27, 33, 36, 38, 73
  • Directive 2004/18 : points 16, 26, 27, 33, 36, 38, 68, 73
  • Regulation 1370/2007 : points 9, 15, 27, 41, 58, 70
  • Regulation 1370/2007 -A02 : point 4
  • Regulation 1370/2007 -A02LB : points 16, 21
  • Regulation 1370/2007 -A02LC : point 16
  • Regulation 1370/2007 -A02LI : point 21
  • Regulation 1370/2007 -A04 : point 5
  • Regulation 1370/2007 -A05 : points 3, 6
  • Regulation 1370/2007 -A05P1 : points 15, 16, 21, 26, 29, 36, 37
  • Regulation 1370/2007 -A05P2 : points 12, 14 - 16, 18, 20, 21, 29, 34 - 36, 39, 40, 42, 50, 64, 73
  • Regulation 1370/2007 -A05P2L1 : points 45, 57
  • Regulation 1370/2007 -A05P2LA : point 49
  • Regulation 1370/2007 -A05P2LB : points 16, 57, 60, 63, 66
  • Regulation 1370/2007 -A05P2LC : point 66
  • Regulation 1370/2007 -A05P2LE : points 21, 67, 68, 72
  • Regulation 1370/2007 -A05P3 : point 36
  • Regulation 1370/2007 -A05P4 : point 36
  • Regulation 1370/2007 -A05P5 : point 36
  • Regulation 1370/2007 -A07 : points 7, 21
  • Regulation 1370/2007 -A07P2 : points 64 - 66
  • Regulation 1370/2007 -A07P4 : point 68
  • Regulation 1370/2007 -A08 : points 8, 61, 63
  • Regulation 1370/2007 -A08P3 : points 16, 62, 73
  • Regulation 1370/2007 -C18 : point 40
  • Regulation 1370/2007 -C19 : point 69
  • Directive 2014/24 : point 27
  • Directive 2014/24 -A12 : point 28
  • Directive 2014/25 -A28 : point 28
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -107/98 : point 27
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -337/98 -N41 : point 30
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -337/98 -N42 : point 30
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -340/04 : point 58
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/05 -N62 : point 58
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -324/07 : point 59
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -576/10 -N52 : point 30
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -213/13 -N31 : point 30
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -324/14 -N83 : point 30
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -567/15 -N70 : point 33
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -567/15 -N71 : points 33, 69
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -567/15 -N79 : point 70
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -292/15 : point 68
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -292/15 -N32 : point 30
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -292/15 -N39 : point 36


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 17/05/2017

Date of the Opinion

  • 13/09/2018

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

21/03/2019


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 269 from 14.08.2017, p.3

Name of the parties

Verkehrsbetrieb Hüttebräucker and BVR Busverkehr Rheinland

Notes on Academic Writings

Information not available



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf - Germany

Subject-matter

  • Transport

Procedure and result

  • Reference for a preliminary ruling
  • Reference for a preliminary ruling : case not proceeding to judgment

Formation of the Court

quatrième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Juhász

Advocate General

Campos Sánchez-Bordona

Language(s) of the Case

  • German

Language(s) of the Opinion

  • Spanish