Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Directive 2001/83 -A02P1 : paragraphs 28 - 31, 34, 41
• Directive 2001/83 -A03PT1 : paragraphs 29, 36, 37
• Directive 2001/83 -A03PT2 : paragraphs 29, 37, 38, 40, 42
• Directive 2001/83 -A87 : paragraph 28
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -544/13 : paragraph 33
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -544/13 -N38 : paragraph 29
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -544/13 -N50 : paragraphs 31, 32
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -544/13 -N66 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -276/15 : paragraph 34

Operative part

• Interprets : Directive 2001/83 -A02P1
• Interprets : Directive 2001/83 -A03PT2

Opinion

• Directive 2001/83 : points 2, 37, 46
  
• Directive 2001/83 -A01PT19 : point 29
  
• Directive 2001/83 -A02 : points 17, 20, 25 - 27, 39
  
• Directive 2001/83 -A02P1 : points 3, 16, 18, 44, 47
  
• Directive 2001/83 -A03 : points 4, 16, 27, 44
  
• Directive 2001/83 -A03PT1 : points 13 - 15, 28 - 31
  
• Directive 2001/83 -A03PT2 : points 13 - 15, 28, 32 - 34, 38, 39, 43, 47
  
• Directive 2001/83 -A06P1 : points 5, 44
  
• Directive 2001/83 -A87P1 : points 6, 44, 45
  
• Directive 2001/83 -C2 : point 42
  
• Directive 2001/83 -C3 : point 42
  
• Directive 2001/83 -TIT8 : point 45
  
• Directive 2006/114 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -143/06 -N23 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -544/13 -N23 : points 16, 39
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -544/13 -N24 : points 16, 39
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -544/13 -N25 : points 16, 39
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -544/13 -N26 : points 16, 39
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -544/13 -N27 : points 16, 39
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -544/13 -N28 : points 16, 39
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -544/13 -N29 : points 16, 39
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -544/13 -N47 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -544/13 -N75 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -544/13 -N76 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -544/13 -N77 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -544/13 -N78 : points 45, 46
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -544/13 -N79 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -544/13 -N80 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -544/13 -N81 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -544/13 -N82 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -544/13 -N83 : point 46
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -544/13 -N36 : point 17
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -544/13 -N39 : points 16, 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -544/13 -N44 : point 19
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -544/13 -N50 : point 19
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -544/13 -N51 : point 19
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -544/13 -N52 : point 20
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -544/13 -N54 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -544/13 -N59 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -544/13 -N66 : point 33
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 09/06/2015

Date of the Opinion

• 30/06/2016

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

26/10/2016

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 6 from 09.01.2017, p.18

Application: OJ C 294 from 07.09.2015, p.27

Name of the parties

Hecht-Pharma

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Douglas, Morton: EuGH: Regelungen über Defekturarzneimittel europarechtskonform, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht PRAX 2016 p.571 (DE)
2. Daniel, Élise: Un médicament humain n'est pas soumis à une autorisation de mise sur le marché du fait qu'il est fabriqué en pharmacie pour les étapes essentielles de sa fabrication dans une quantité allant jusqu'à 100 boîtes par jour. Il ne saurait être considéré comme ayant été préparé industriellement, Europe 2016 Décembre Comm. nº 12 p.39 (FR)
3. Daniel, Élise: Autorisation de mise sur le marché, Europe 2016 Décembre nº 12 p.39 (FR)
4. Forni, Federico: Medicinale galenico e pubblicità : questo matrimonio non s'ha da fare ?, Diritto comunitario e degli scambi internazionali 2017 p.83-113 (IT)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Bundesgerichtshof - Germany

Subject-matter

• Approximation of laws
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Arzneimittelgesetz (AMG), Paragraph 21 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 Apothekenbetriebsordnung (ApBetrO), Paragraph 6 Abs. 1 Heilmittelwerbegesetz (HWG), Paragraph 3a

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

Information not available

Judge-Rapporteur

Fernlund

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

• German
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

Information not available