Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 4 June 2020

Asmel societá consortile a r.l. v A.N.A.C. - Autorità Nazionale Anticorruzione

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Consiglio di Stato

Case C-3/19


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment (OJ)
24/07/2020 Asmel
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2020:423
04/06/2020 Asmel
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:2020:254
02/04/2020 Asmel
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Application (OJ)
26/04/2019 Asmel
Request for a preliminary ruling
03/01/2019 Asmel
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

not yet published (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.02 Public procurement
      4.11.02.02 General rules applicable to public contracts
        4.11.02.02.01 Scope
          4.11.02.02.01.03 Concept of contracting authority
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.02 Public procurement
      4.11.02.02 General rules applicable to public contracts
        4.11.02.02.01 Scope
          4.11.02.02.01.03 Concept of contracting authority
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.02 Public procurement
      4.11.02.02 General rules applicable to public contracts
        4.11.02.02.01 Scope
          4.11.02.02.01.09 'In house' exemption
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.02 Public procurement
      4.11.02.02 General rules applicable to public contracts
        4.11.02.02.01 Scope
          4.11.02.02.01.03 Concept of contracting authority


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

  • TFEU, Article 56 : paragraph 44
  • TFEU, Article 57 : paragraph 32
  • TFEU, Article 267 : paragraph 39
  • Directive 92/50 : paragraphs 59, 60
  • Directive 2004/18 : paragraphs 27, 45, 48, 51, 60, 61, 65, 69, 71
  • Directive 2004/18 -A01P8 : paragraph 5
  • Directive 2004/18 -A01P9 : paragraphs 5, 54, 56, 70
  • Directive 2004/18 -A01P9L1 : paragraph 52
  • Directive 2004/18 -A01P9L2 : paragraph 53
  • Directive 2004/18 -A01P10 : paragraphs 1, 5, 44, 46, 48, 49, 50, 55, 56, 67, 68, 70, 72
  • Directive 2004/18 -A01P11 : paragraph 48
  • Directive 2004/18 -A02 : paragraph 6
  • Directive 2004/18 -A07 : paragraph 47
  • Directive 2004/18 -A07LBT1 : paragraph 7
  • Directive 2004/18 -A07LC : paragraph 7
  • Directive 2004/18 -A11 : paragraphs 1, 8, 44, 46, 49, 56, 67, 68, 72
  • Directive 2004/18 -A11P1 : paragraph 55
  • Directive 2004/18 -A11P2 : paragraphs 55, 58
  • Directive 2004/18 -C2 : paragraphs 3, 57
  • Directive 2004/18 -C16 : paragraphs 4, 55, 56
  • Directive 2004/18 -N4 : paragraph 7
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -264/03 : paragraph 59
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -264/03 -N46 : paragraph 60
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -264/03 -N51 : paragraph 60
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -264/03 -N55 : paragraph 60
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -305/08 -N38 : paragraph 70
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -553/15 -N28 : paragraph 58
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -567/15 -N31 : paragraph 54
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/18 -N22 : paragraph 39
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -402/18 -N24 : paragraph 33
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -621/18 -N28 : paragraph 34
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -3/19 : paragraph 63

Operative part

  • Interprets : Directive 2004/18 -A01P10
  • Interprets : Directive 2004/18 -A11

Opinion

  • TFEU, Article 56 : points 70, 75, 93
  • TFEU, Article 57 : points 69, 70, 75
  • Directive 2004/18 : points 2, 40, 41, 43, 56, 59, 62, 66, 67, 70, 72, 76, 91
  • Directive 2004/18 -A01 : point 5
  • Directive 2004/18 -A01P9 : points 52, 82
  • Directive 2004/18 -A01P9L2 : point 53
  • Directive 2004/18 -A01P10 : points 42, 50
  • Directive 2004/18 -A07 : point 44
  • Directive 2004/18 -A11 : points 6, 51, 95
  • Directive 2004/18 -A11P1 : points 58, 83
  • Directive 2004/18 -C15 : points 3, 48
  • Directive 2004/18 -C16 : points 4, 57
  • Directive 2014/23 -A02P1 : point 61
  • Directive 2014/24 : point 74
  • Directive 2014/24 -A37P1 : point 63
  • Directive 2014/24 -A37P4 : point 73
  • Directive 2014/24 -C5 : point 61
  • Directive 2014/24 -C59 : points 49, 76
  • Directive 2014/24 -C69 : point 51
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -268/15 -N47 : point 75
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -285/18 -N44 : point 60
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -285/18 -N45 : point 61
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -285/18 -N47 : point 61
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -285/18 -N48 : point 68


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 03/01/2019

Date of the Opinion

  • 02/04/2020

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

04/06/2020


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Information not available

Name of the parties

Asmel

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Abenhaïm, Marc: Marchés publics - Centrale d'achats, Europe 2020, n° 8-9 Août, Comm. 257 (FR)
  2. Smith, Susie: Is it permitted for national legislation to place restrictions on the models of organisation, membership and operational territories of central purchasing bodies? Asmel (C-3/19), Public Procurement Law Review 2020 p. NA242-NA246 (EN)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Consiglio di Stato - Italy

Subject-matter

  • Freedom of establishment
  • Freedom to provide services
  • Approximation of laws

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Reference for a preliminary ruling

Formation of the Court

deuxième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Lenaerts

Advocate General

Campos Sánchez-Bordona

Language(s) of the Case

  • Italian

Language(s) of the Opinion

  • Spanish