Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Regulation 261/2004 : paragraph 35
• Regulation 261/2004 -A05 : paragraph 4
• Regulation 261/2004 -A05P1 : paragraph 19
• Regulation 261/2004 -A05P1LC : paragraph 27
• Regulation 261/2004 -A05P3 : paragraphs 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 32, 37, 38, 42, 48, 49, 54, 55
• Regulation 261/2004 -A07 : paragraphs 17, 20, 27, 31, 38, 43, 45, 48, 49, 51, 53, 54
• Regulation 261/2004 -A07P1 : paragraph 5
• Regulation 261/2004 -C1 : paragraphs 3, 25, 42
• Regulation 261/2004 -C7 : paragraphs 3, 42
• Regulation 261/2004 -C13 : paragraphs 6, 36
• Regulation 261/2004 -C14 : paragraphs 3, 17, 18, 20, 21, 24, 26, 32, 37, 38, 48, 49, 54, 55
• Regulation 261/2004 -C15 : paragraphs 3, 20
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -549/07 : paragraphs 16, 17
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -402/07 -N61 : paragraph 29
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -402/07 -N69 : paragraph 20
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -549/07 : paragraph 16
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -549/07 -N21 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -549/07 -N23 : paragraph 22
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -294/10 -N25 : paragraphs 28, 29
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -294/10 -N30 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -581/10 -N40 : paragraph 19
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -12/11 : paragraph 16
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -12/11 -N29 : paragraph 22
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -12/11 -N38 : paragraph 20
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -257/14 -N36 : paragraph 22
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -257/14 -N41 : paragraph 23
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -257/14 -N43 : paragraph 23
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -257/14 -N46 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -40/15 -N17 : paragraph 57

Operative part

• Interprets : Regulation 261/2004 -A05P3
• Interprets : Regulation 261/2004 -A07
• Interprets : Regulation 261/2004 -C14

Opinion

• Agreement with Third Countries or International Bodies - 22001A0718(01) : point 3
  
• Regulation 261/2004 : points 1, 25, 47, 48
  
• Regulation 261/2004 -A05P3 : points 2, 4, 21, 22, 23, 24, 44, 49
  
• Regulation 261/2004 -A07 : points 14, 22
  
• Regulation 261/2004 -A07P1LA : point 5
  
• Regulation 261/2004 -A13 : point 45
  
• Regulation 261/2004 -C13 : point 6
  
• Regulation 261/2004 -C14 : points 3, 14, 24
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -549/07 : point 14
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -12/11 -N29 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -257/14 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -257/14 -N35 : point 23
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -257/14 -N36 : point 24
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -257/14 -N41 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -257/14 -N42 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -257/14 -N46 : point 45
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 26/06/2015

Date of the Opinion

• 28/07/2016

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

04/05/2017

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 213 from 03.07.2017, p.7

Application: OJ C 414 from 14.12.2015, p.12

Name of the parties

Pešková and Peška

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Berlin, Dominique: L'oiseau a bon dos !, La Semaine Juridique - édition générale 2017 nº 21 p.992 (FR)
2. Novak, Janez: Stavka in pravice tretjih oseb, Pravna praksa 2017 nº 24-25 p.17-20 (SL)
3. Wienbracke, Mike: Verbraucherrecht: Ausgleichsleistungen bei Flugverspätung nach Kollision des Flugzeugs mit einem Vogel, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2017 p.575-580 (DE)
4. Visscher, L.T.: Over vogels, vliegtuigen en vertragingsschade, Aansprakelijkheid en verzekering - A & V 2017 p.118-122 (NL)
5. Kompare, Neža: Trk letala s ptico, Pravna praksa 2017 nº 26 p.27-28 (SL)
6. Politis, Antonios: Ausgleichsleistungen bei Flugverspätung nach Kollision des Flugzeugs mit einem Vogel, Neue juristische Wochenschrift 2017 p.2669 (DE)
7. Michel, Valérie: Avion vs oiseau : 1/0 – Consommateurs vs transporteur : 0/1 : vers un assouplissement de la jurisprudence de la Cour ?, Europe 2017 Juillet Comm. nº 271 p.38-39 (FR)
8. De Smet, Vincent: HvJ (3e k.) 4 mei 2017 - Pešková-Peška/Travel Service - C-315/15, Tijdschrft voor Internationale Handel en Transportrecht 2017 n°3 p.373-374 (NL)
9. De Coninck, Hans: Vluchtvertraging wegens "birdstrike": belangrijk arrest van het EHJ, Droit de la consommation 2017 p.91-93 (NL)
10. Loos, M.B.M.: Nederlandse jurisprudentie ; Uitspraken in burgerlijke en strafzaken 2018 nº 10/11 p.1198-1200 (NL)
11. Audenaert, Nicola: NOOT - Birdstrike : doos van Pandora of storm in een glas water ?, Rechtskundig weekblad 2018 - 03 p.105-109 (NL)
12. Correia, Vincent: XX. Droit des transports - Cour de justice, 3e ch., 4 mai 2017, Pešková et Peška, aff. C-315/15, ECLI:EU:C:2017:342, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2017. Décisions et commentaires (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2018, p. 905-913 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Obvodní soud pro Prahu 6 - Czech Republic

Subject-matter

• Transport
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  
• Reference for a preliminary ruling : case not proceeding to judgment
  

Formation of the Court

troisième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Šváby

Advocate General

Bot

Language(s) of the Case

• Czech
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• French