Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 16 : paragraphs 1, 12, 14, 25, 27, 34, 45
• TFEU, Article 26 : paragraphs 1, 14, 25, 27, 33
• TFEU, Article 34 : paragraph 31
• TFEU, Article 35 : paragraph 31
• TFEU, Article 49 : paragraphs 1, 14, 25, 27, 30, 32, 34 - 37, 50, 65
• TFEU, Article 56 : paragraphs 1, 14, 25, 27, 30, 32, 34 - 37, 50, 65
• TFEU, Article 63 : paragraphs 1, 14, 25, 27, 32
• TFEU, Article 267 : paragraphs 1, 17, 21 - 25
• TFEU, Article 267 -L3 : paragraph 24
• TFEU, Article 267 -P3 : paragraphs 12, 13, 26
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/01 -N56 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -338/04 -N69 : paragraph 60
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -430/05 -N54 : paragraph 60
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -95/07 -N65 : paragraph 61
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -95/07 -N66 : paragraph 61
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -95/07 -N67 : paragraph 61
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -210/10 -N48 : paragraph 63
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -545/11 : paragraph 12
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -259/12 -N38 : paragraph 61
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/12 -N60 : paragraph 50
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -463/13 -N45 : paragraph 35
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -5/14 -N34 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -5/14 -N35 : paragraph 22
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -5/14 -N36 : paragraph 23
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -98/14 -N74 : paragraph 44
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -98/14 -N77 : paragraph 46
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -98/14 -N78 : paragraph 47
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -98/14 -N85 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -98/14 -N91 : paragraph 50
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -160/14 -N37 : paragraph 24
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -375/14 -N22 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -375/14 -N33 : paragraph 58
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -375/14 -N34 : paragraph 58
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -375/14 -N35 : paragraph 43
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -225/15 -N39 : paragraph 39
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -225/15 -N40 : paragraph 40
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -225/15 -N42 : paragraph 42
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -225/15 -N43 : paragraph 42
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -225/15 -N44 : paragraph 51
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -225/15 -N49 : paragraph 52
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -447/15 -N33 : paragraph 17
• Court of Justice - Order C -438/15 -N14 : paragraph 29

Operative part

• Interprets : TFEU, Article 49
• Interprets : TFEU, Article 56
• Interprets : TFEU, Article 267 -P3

Opinion

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 15 : point 61
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 16 : points 2, 24, 59, 60, 69, 71
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 17 : point 61
  
• TFEU, Article 26 : point 37
  
• TFEU, Article 49 : points 28 - 30, 36, 38, 39, 44, 53, 54, 69, 71
  
• TFEU, Article 56 : points 29, 37, 61, 69, 71
  
• TFEU, Article 59 : point 28
  
• TFEU, Article 63 : points 28, 29, 35, 37, 69, 71
  
• TFEU, Article 267 : points 13, 15, 16, 17, 20 - 23, 71
  
• TFEU, Article 267 -P3 : point 12
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -283/81 : point 18
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -298/87 -N10 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -298/87 -N8 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -298/87 -N9 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -348/89 -N39 : point 17
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -6/90 : point 20
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -46/93 : point 20
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -299/94 -N34 : point 63
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -299/94 -N35 : point 63
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -321/94 -N45 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -183/95 -N57 : point 58
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -200/98 -N30 : point 37
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -313/99 -N48 : point 63
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -62/00 -N43 : point 63
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -62/00 -N44 : point 63
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -62/00 -N45 : point 63
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -62/00 -N46 : point 63
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -62/00 -N47 : point 63
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -224/01 : point 20
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N23 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N24 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N25 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N26 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N27 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N28 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N29 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N30 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N31 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N32 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N33 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N34 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N35 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N36 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N37 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N38 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N39 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N40 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N41 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N42 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N43 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N44 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N45 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N46 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N47 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N48 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N49 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N50 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N51 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N52 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N53 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N54 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N55 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N56 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N57 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N58 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N59 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N60 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N61 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N62 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N63 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N64 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N65 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N66 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N67 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N68 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N69 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N70 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N71 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N72 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N73 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N74 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N75 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -442/02 -N76 : point 32
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -442/02 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -442/02 -N10 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -442/02 -N11 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -442/02 -N12 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -442/02 -N13 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -442/02 -N14 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -442/02 -N15 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -442/02 -N16 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -442/02 -N8 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -442/02 -N9 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -544/03 -N31 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -338/04 -N68 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -338/04 -N69 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -338/04 -N70 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -338/04 -N71 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -430/05 -N54 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -210/06 -N88 : point 16
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -42/07 -N59 : point 41
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -201/08 -N53 : point 66
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -173/09 -N27 : point 17
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -221/09 -N71 : point 63
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -347/09 -N48 : point 41
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -72/10 -N50 : point 68
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -188/10 -N41 : point 16
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -188/10 -N45 : point 17
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -188/10 -N47 : point 17
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -416/10 -N68 : point 17
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -545/11 : point 12
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -630/11 -N132 : point 63
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -159/12 -N26 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -497/12 -N30 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -136/12 -N28 : point 22
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/12 -N57 : point 61
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/12 -N58 : point 61
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/12 -N59 : point 61
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/12 -N60 : point 61
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -483/12 -N25 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -463/13 -N45 : point 38
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion 2/13 -N176 : point 21
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -375/14 -N2 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -526/14 -N69 : point 58
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -526/14 -N70 : point 58
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -98/14 -N36 : point 28
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -98/14 -N76 : point 58
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -160/14 : point 20
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -336/14 -N55 : point 51
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -375/14 -N32 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -225/15 -N1 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -225/15 -N2 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -225/15 -N3 : point 1
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -168/15 : point 20
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -225/15 -N39 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -225/15 -N40 : point 41
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -268/15 -N47 : point 28
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 07/06/2016

Date of the Opinion

• 08/06/2017

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

20/12/2017

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 72 from 26.02.2018, p.15

Application: OJ C 343 from 19.09.2016, p.23

Name of the parties

Global Starnet

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Gindler, Michael: Niederlassungsfreiheit: Konzessionen für den Betrieb von Online-Glücksspielen, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2018 p.284-286 (DE)
2. Lazzerini, Nicole: Il rapporto tra primato del diritto dell'Unione e tutela costituzionale dei diritti fondamentali nella sentenza Taricco-bis: buona la seconda?, Rivista di diritto internazionale 2018 p.234-242 (IT)
3. Fortunato, Susanna: I rapporti tra obbligo di rinvio pregiudiziale e giudizio di constituzionalità: il caso italiano dei giochi d'azzardo, Il Foro italiano 2018 IV Col. pag. 434-442 (IT)
4. Prevedourou, Evgenia V.: Schési prodikastikís kai elégchoy syntagmatikótitas ethnikōn diatáxeōn, Dioikitiki Diki 2018 p. (EL)
5. Simon, Denys: Renvoi préjudiciel - Obligation de renvoi, Europe 2018, Février nº 2, Comm. 52 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Consiglio di Stato - Italy

Subject-matter

• Freedom of establishment
  
• Freedom to provide services
  
• Free movement of capital
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

première chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Rodin

Advocate General

Wahl

Language(s) of the Case

• Italian
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• English