Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 25 October 2018

Martina Sciotto v Fondazione Teatro dell'Opera di Roma

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Corte d'appello di Roma

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 1999/70/EC — Framework agreement on fixed-term work concluded by ETUC, UNICE and CEEP — Clause 5 — Measures to prevent the misuse of successive fixed-term employment contracts or relationships — National legislation excluding the application of those measures in the sector of activity of operatic and orchestral foundations

Case C-331/17


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment (OJ)
07/12/2018 Sciotto
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2018:859
25/10/2018 Sciotto
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment (Summary)
ECLI:EU:C:2018:859
25/10/2018 Sciotto
Application (OJ)
01/09/2017 Sciotto
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.14 Social policy
    4.14.07 Fixed-term work


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

  • TFEU, Article 267 : paragraph 27
  • TEU, Article 4 : paragraph 67
  • Directive 1999/70 : paragraphs 57, 60
  • Directive 1999/70 -A01 : paragraph 3
  • Directive 1999/70 -NCL1 : paragraph 6
  • Directive 1999/70 -NCL2PT1 : paragraph 7
  • Directive 1999/70 -NCL3 : paragraph 8
  • Directive 1999/70 -NCL3PT1 : paragraph 43
  • Directive 1999/70 -NCL4PT1 : paragraphs 9, 71
  • Directive 1999/70 -NCL5 : paragraphs 1, 24, 29, 43, 66, 70, 72
  • Directive 1999/70 -NCL5PT1 : paragraphs 10, 30, 35, 44, 55, 68
  • Directive 1999/70 -NCL5PT1LA : paragraphs 32, 33, 37, 50
  • Directive 1999/70 -NCL5PT1LB : paragraph 36
  • Directive 1999/70 -NCL5PT1LC : paragraphs 32, 33, 36
  • Directive 1999/70 -NCL5PT2 : paragraph 59
  • Directive 1999/70 -NPRL2 : paragraph 4
  • Directive 1999/70 -NPRL3 : paragraphs 4, 35
  • Directive 1999/70 -NPT6 : paragraphs 5, 31
  • Directive 1999/70 -NPT7 : paragraphs 5, 31, 38
  • Directive 1999/70 -NPT8 : paragraphs 5, 31, 35
  • Directive 1999/70 -NPT10 : paragraphs 5, 35
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -180/04 -N32 : paragraph 43
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/04 -N54 : paragraph 43
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/04 -N56 : paragraph 43
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/04 -N63 : paragraph 30
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/13 -N110 : paragraph 55
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/13 -N67 : paragraph 43
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/13 -N70 : paragraph 35
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/13 -N72 : paragraph 30
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/13 -N73 : paragraph 31
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/13 -N74 : paragraph 32
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/13 -N75 : paragraph 33
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/13 -N76 : paragraph 34
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/13 -N77 : paragraph 64
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/13 -N79 : paragraph 65
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/13 -N80 : paragraph 59
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/13 -N86 : paragraph 38
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/13 -N87 : paragraph 39
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/13 -N88 : paragraph 40
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/13 -N91 : paragraphs 47, 57
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/13 -N99 : paragraph 57
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/14 : paragraph 20
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/14 -N36 : paragraph 31
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/14 -N37 : paragraph 32
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/14 -N38 : paragraph 33
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/14 -N39 : paragraph 34
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/14 -N40 : paragraph 35
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/14 -N43 : paragraph 38
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/14 -N44 : paragraph 39
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -238/14 -N45 : paragraph 40
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -352/14 -N21 : paragraph 27
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -352/14 -N22 : paragraph 28
  • Court of Justice - Order C -86/14 -N47 : paragraph 59
  • Court of Justice - Order C -86/14 -N56 : paragraph 69
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -16/15 -N24 : paragraph 43
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -16/15 -N27 : paragraph 31
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -16/15 -N44 : paragraph 47
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -184/15 -N41 : paragraph 60
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -184/15 -N50 : paragraph 67
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -184/15 -N51 : paragraph 68
  • Court of Justice - Order C -614/15 -N63 : paragraph 55
  • Court of Justice - Order C -614/15 -N64 : paragraph 57
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -494/16 -N25 : paragraph 30
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -494/16 -N26 : paragraph 32
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -494/16 -N27 : paragraph 33
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -494/16 -N28 : paragraph 34
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -494/16 -N29 : paragraph 64
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -494/16 -N31 : paragraph 65
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -494/16 -N34 : paragraph 60
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -494/16 -N35 : paragraph 62
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -494/16 -N36 : paragraph 62
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -494/16 -N52 : paragraph 63
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -494/16 -N53 : paragraph 63

Operative part

  • Interprets : Directive 1999/70 -NCL5

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 01/06/2017

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

25/10/2018


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 4 from 07.01.2019, p.4

Application: OJ C 309 from 18.09.2017, p.26

Name of the parties

Sciotto

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Gundt, N.: Het tijdelijke contract en de concrete objectieve reden - here we go again. Generieke uitzonderingen op de ketenregeling moeten voldoende specifiek zijn en voorzien in gelijkwaardige bescherming tegen misbruik, Tijdschrift Recht en Arbeid 2019 nº 11 p.28-29 (NL)
  2. Driguez, Laetitia: Succession abusive de CDD, Europe 2019 Janvier Comm. nº 1 p.42-43 (FR)
  3. Marié, Romain: Succession de CDD : les limites de l'approche sectorielle, Revue de jurisprudence sociale 2019 N°2 p.85-86 (FR)
  4. Opolony, Bernhard: Die Befristung von Bühnenarbeitsverhältnissen – neue europarechtliche Anforderungen an den NV Bühne? – Anmerkung zu EuGH, Urteil vom 25.10.2018 – EUGH Aktenzeichen C33117 C-331/17 – Martina Sciotto/Fondazione Teatro dell´Opera di Roma (ZUM 2019, ZUM Jahr 2019 Seite 321), Zeitschrift für Urheber- und Medienrecht 2019 p.327-330 (DE)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Corte d'appello di Roma - Italy

Subject-matter

  • Social policy

Procedure and result

  • Reference for a preliminary ruling

Formation of the Court

dixième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Biltgen

Advocate General

Saugmandsgaard Øe

Language(s) of the Case

  • Italian

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available