Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 5 October 2017

Hanssen Beleggingen BV v Tanja Prast-Knipping

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Judicial cooperation in civil and commercial matters — Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 — Jurisdiction — Article 2(1) — Jurisdiction of the courts of the place where the defendant is domiciled — Article 22(4) — Exclusive jurisdiction in proceedings concerned with the registration or validity of intellectual property rights — Proceedings to determine whether a person was correctly registered as the proprietor of a trade mark

Case C-341/16


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment (OJ)
10/11/2017 Hanssen Beleggingen
View pdf documents
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2017:738
05/10/2017 Hanssen Beleggingen
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment (Summary)
ECLI:EU:C:2017:738
05/10/2017 Hanssen Beleggingen
Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:2017:551
13/07/2017 Hanssen Beleggingen
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Application (OJ)
19/08/2016 Hanssen Beleggingen
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
      4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.02 Judicial cooperation in civil matters
      4.06.02.01 Jurisdiction, recognition and enforcement of judgments – Civil and commercial matters


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

  • Regulation 44/2001 : paragraphs 3, 4
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A02P1 : paragraphs 5, 23
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A22 : paragraphs 6, 32
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A22PT4 : paragraphs 1, 23, 25, 28 - 31, 33, 37, 39, 42, 43
  • Regulation 207/2009 -A18 : paragraphs 26, 41
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A66P1 : paragraph 3
  • Brussels Convention 1968 : paragraph 3
  • Brussels Convention 1968 -A16 : paragraph 32
  • Brussels Convention 1968 -A16PT4 : paragraphs 7, 30, 31, 33
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -288/82 : paragraph 25
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -288/82 -N19 : paragraph 31
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -288/82 -N22 : paragraph 34
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -288/82 -N23 : paragraph 34
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -288/82 -N24 : paragraph 34
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -288/82 -N25 : paragraph 34
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -288/82 -N26 : paragraph 35
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -115/88 -N9 : paragraph 32
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -4/03 -N14 : paragraph 31
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -4/03 -N15 : paragraph 34
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -4/03 -N16 : paragraph 34
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -4/03 -N21 : paragraph 33
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -4/03 -N22 : paragraph 33
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -144/10 -N30 : paragraph 32
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -616/10 -N43 : paragraph 30
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -230/15 : paragraph 42
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -341/16 : paragraph 36

Operative part

  • Interprets : Regulation 44/2001 -A22PT4

Opinion

  • TFEU, Article 350 : point 34
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A02P1 : points 3, 5, 12, 30, 31, 32
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A05PT3 : point 31
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A22PT4 : points 1, 3, 4, 6, 12, 14, 16, 18, 25 - 27, 30, 32, 33, 37, 38
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A25 : point 37
  • Regulation 44/2001 -A71 : points 34, 36
  • Regulation 1215/2012 -A66P1 : point 13
  • Brussels Convention 1968 -A16PT4 : points 18, 23, 25
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -288/82 : point 18
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -288/82 -N19 : point 20
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -288/82 -N22 : point 21
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -288/82 -N23 : point 22
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -288/82 -N24 : points 22, 26, 27
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -288/82 -N25 : points 22, 26, 27
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -288/82 -N26 : point 23
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -288/82 -N3 : point 19
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -4/03 -N14 : points 18, 20
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -4/03 -N15 : points 18, 22
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -4/03 -N16 : point 18
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -4/03 -N17 : point 18
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -4/03 -N18 : point 18
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -4/03 -N19 : point 18
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -4/03 -N20 : point 18
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -4/03 -N21 : points 18, 21
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -4/03 -N22 : points 18, 21
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -4/03 -N23 : points 18, 21
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -189/08 -N18 : point 25
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -616/10 -N42 : point 25
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -616/10 -N43 : point 25
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -47/14 -N38 : point 25
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -12/15 -N22 : point 25
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -230/15 : points 35, 37
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -230/15 -N66 : point 34


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 16/06/2016

Date of the Opinion

  • 13/07/2017

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

05/10/2017


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 402 from 27.11.2017, p.6

Application: OJ C 326 from 05.09.2016, p.14

Name of the parties

Hanssen Beleggingen

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Nourissat, Cyril: Titularité d'une marque Benelux, Procédures 2017 nº 12 p.20 (FR)
  2. Idot, Laurence: Compétence exclusive en matière d'inscription ou de validité de titres de propriété intellectuelle, Europe 2017 décembre nº 12 p.45 (FR)
  3. Mankowski, Peter: Orthodoxes und Häretisches zum Umfang der ausschließlichen Zuständigkeiten aus Art. 24 Nr. 4 und Nr. 3 EuGVVO bei registrierten IP-Rechten mit Blick auf Prätendentenstreitigkeiten, Praxis des internationalen Privat- und Verfahrensrechts 2018 p.355-360 (DE)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf - Germany

Subject-matter

  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - Judicial cooperation in civil matters

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Reference for a preliminary ruling

Formation of the Court

deuxième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Ilešič

Advocate General

Saugmandsgaard Øe

Language(s) of the Case

  • German

Language(s) of the Opinion

  • French