Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Directive 2004/18 : paragraph 1
• Directive 2004/18 -A01P2LA : paragraph 4
• Directive 2004/18 -A02 : paragraphs 5, 33 - 38, 44 - 46, 54, 55, 65, 79, 88
• Directive 2004/18 -A44 : paragraphs 6, 33, 46, 54, 55, 65, 79, 88
• Directive 2004/18 -A44P1 : paragraphs 43, 57, 61, 80
• Directive 2004/18 -A44P2 : paragraphs 58, 82
• Directive 2004/18 -A44P2L2 : paragraph 49
• Directive 2004/18 -A45P1 : paragraph 67
• Directive 2004/18 -A45P2 : paragraphs 7, 67
• Directive 2004/18 -A45P2L1 : paragraph 74
• Directive 2004/18 -A45P2L2 : paragraph 73
• Directive 2004/18 -A45P2LG : paragraphs 33, 66, 68, 70, 77, 78
• Directive 2004/18 -A47 : paragraphs 57, 58, 80
• Directive 2004/18 -A47P2 : paragraphs 47, 48
• Directive 2004/18 -A48 : paragraphs 8, 57, 58, 80
• Directive 2004/18 -A48P2LA : paragraphs 33, 46, 54, 55, 59, 65, 79, 88
• Directive 2004/18 -A48P3 : paragraphs 33, 46 - 48, 54, 60
• Directive 2004/18 -A49 : paragraphs 57, 80
• Directive 2004/18 -A50 : paragraphs 57, 80
• Directive 2004/18 -A51 : paragraphs 9, 33, 34, 45, 57, 80
• Directive 2004/18 -A52 : paragraphs 57, 80
• Directive 2004/18 -C46 : paragraphs 3, 35
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -336/12 : paragraph 33
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -465/11 -N26 : paragraph 74
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -387/14 : paragraphs 43, 52, 86
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -324/14 -N33 : paragraph 47
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -324/14 -N39 : paragraphs 48, 82
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -324/14 -N40 : paragraphs 49, 82, 83
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -324/14 -N41 : paragraph 82
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -324/14 -N56 : paragraph 83
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -324/14 -N60 : paragraph 35
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -324/14 -N61 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -324/14 -N62 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -324/14 -N63 : paragraph 38
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -324/14 -N64 : paragraph 39
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -324/14 -N65 : paragraph 40
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -298/15 -N90 : paragraph 82

Operative part

• Interprets : Directive 2004/18 -A02
• Interprets : Directive 2004/18 -A44
• Interprets : Directive 2004/18 -A45P2LG
• Interprets : Directive 2004/18 -A48P2LA
• Interprets : Directive 2004/18 -A48P3
• Interprets : Directive 2004/18 -A51

Opinion

• Directive 2004/18 -A02 : points 3, 20, 21, 92
  
• Directive 2004/18 -A44 : points 4, 20, 47, 50, 68
  
• Directive 2004/18 -A45 : points 5, 92
  
• Directive 2004/18 -A45P2 : points 74, 81
  
• Directive 2004/18 -A45P2LG : points 2, 20, 69, 70, 74, 76, 81, 84 - 86, 89, 91, 92
  
• Directive 2004/18 -A48P2 : point 6
  
• Directive 2004/18 -A48P2LA : points 20, 50, 68, 89, 90, 92
  
• Directive 2004/18 -A48P2LB : points 55, 92
  
• Directive 2004/18 -A48P3 : points 7, 20, 47, 92
  
• Directive 2004/18 -A51 : points 8, 20, 21, 25, 36, 92
  
• Directive 2004/18 -CH7S2 : points 91, 92
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -176/98 -N26 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -176/98 -N27 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/01 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -314/01 -N43 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -599/10 -N36 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -599/10 -N38 : points 26, 83
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -599/10 -N40 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -599/10 -N41 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -94/12 -N30 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -94/12 -N31 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -94/12 -N32 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -94/12 -N34 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -94/12 -N35 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -336/12 : point 23
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -336/12 -N31 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -336/12 -N32 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -336/12 -N33 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -336/12 -N34 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -336/12 -N35 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -336/12 -N36 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -42/13 -N45 : points 26, 30
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -396/14 -N80 : point 31
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -324/14 -N62 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -324/14 -N63 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -324/14 -N64 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -396/14 -N35 : point 33
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 14/08/2014

Date of the Opinion

• 24/11/2016

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

04/05/2017

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 213 from 03.07.2017, p.5

Application: OJ C 431 from 01.12.2014, p.7

Name of the parties

Esaprojekt

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Basta Trtnik, Milena: Poziv za predložitev dokazil samo najugodnejšemu ponudniku? Ne vedno!, Pravna praksa 2017 nº 24-25 p.8-10 (SL)
2. Simon, Denys: Modification des offres, Europe 2017 Juillet Comm. nº 267 p.35-36 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Krajowa Izba Odwoławcza (Chambre nationale de recours) - Poland

Subject-matter

• Freedom of movement for persons
  
• - Freedom of establishment
  
• Freedom to provide services
  
• Approximation of laws
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

Cinquième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Tizzano

Advocate General

Bobek

Language(s) of the Case

• Polish
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• English