Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• TFEU, Article 45 : paragraphs 1, 9, 12, 14, 15, 18, 36, 42
• TFEU, Article 45 -P1 : paragraphs 35, 41
• TFEU, Article 45 -P2 : paragraphs 16, 22, 27, 34
• Regulation 492/2011 -A07 : paragraph 18
• Regulation 492/2011 -A07P1 : paragraphs 1, 3, 12, 14 - 16, 22, 27, 42
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -190/98 -N25 : paragraph 40
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -20/12 -N5 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -20/12 -N12 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -20/12 -N45 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -20/12 -N514 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -20/12 -N799 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -20/12 -N2013 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -514/12 : paragraphs 31, 33
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -514/12 -N2 : paragraph 18
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -514/12 -N15 : paragraph 18
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -514/12 -N23 : paragraph 16
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -514/12 -N25 : paragraph 18
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -514/12 -N35 : paragraph 18
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -514/12 -N152 : paragraph 18
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -514/12 -N496 : paragraph 18
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -514/12 -N2017 : paragraph 18
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -496/15 -N35 : paragraph 18
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -496/15 -N36 : paragraph 19
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -566/15 -N33 : paragraph 36
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -566/15 -N34 : paragraph 37
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -437/17 : paragraphs 22, 32, 39, 40
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -272/17 -N45 : paragraph 38

Operative part

• Interprets : TFEU, Article 45
• Interprets : Regulation 492/2011 -A07P1

Opinion

• TFEU, Article 45 : points 12, 14, 47 - 49, 51, 58, 60, 69
  
• TFEU, Article 45 -P1 : points 1, 79
  
• TFEU, Article 45 -P2 : points 1, 18, 19, 22, 79
  
• Directive 2003/88 : points 50, 75
  
• Directive 2003/88 -A07P1 : point 14
  
• Regulation 593/2008 -A08P2 : point 41
  
• Regulation 492/2011 -A07P1 : points 1, 5, 12, 18, 19, 22, 79
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -152/73 -N11 : points 22, 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -61/77 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -237/85 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -104/86 -N12 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -379/87 -N12 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -379/87 -N23 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -49/89 -N8 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -159/90 -N24 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/91 -N11 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -384/93 -N88 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -279/93 -N28 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -384/93 -N51 : point 74
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -415/93 -N94 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -415/93 -N95 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -415/93 -N96 : points 47, 54
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -237/94 -N27 : point 26
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -237/94 : point 23
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -237/94 -N20 : point 23
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -237/94 -N22 : point 24
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -274/96 -N38 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -15/96 -N22 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -15/96 -N26 : points 68, 71
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -15/96 -N27 : point 68
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/96 -N45 : point 23
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -187/96 -N20 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -187/96 -N21 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -350/96 -N29 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -167/97 -N59 : point 33
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -190/98 -N32 : point 51
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -190/98 -N18 : point 47
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -190/98 -N25 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -195/98 -N41 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -195/98 -N42 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -195/98 -N43 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -195/98 -N44 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -195/98 -N49 : points 39, 68, 71
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -226/98 -N33 : point 31
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -281/98 -N39 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -281/98 -N40 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -281/98 -N41 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -281/98 -N42 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -160/99 -N22 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -224/01 : point 77
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -224/01 -N70 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -224/01 -N71 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -224/01 -N73 : points 36, 38
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -224/01 -N74 : point 61
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -224/01 -N83 : point 68
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -224/01 -N84 : points 39, 68, 71
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -224/01 -N85 : points 38, 77
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -224/01 -N86 : point 77
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -388/01 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -147/03 -N43 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -147/03 -N46 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -147/03 -N47 : point 25
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -278/03 -N18 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -144/04 -N63 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -371/04 -N17 : point 19
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -371/04 -N18 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -178/04 -N34 : point 68
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -208/05 -N39 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -411/05 -N68 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/06 -N44 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/06 -N45 : point 49
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/06 -N52 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -269/07 -N53 : point 22
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -269/07 -N54 : point 23
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -211/08 -N72 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -325/08 -N34 : point 54
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -379/09 : point 40
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -379/09 -N22 : point 49
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -602/10 -N81 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -172/11 -N39 : point 22
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -172/11 -N41 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -379/11 -N51 : point 69
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -20/12 -N41 : point 22
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -20/12 -N45 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -514/12 : points 42, 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -514/12 -N23 : point 19
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -514/12 -N26 : point 23
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -514/12 -N27 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -514/12 -N28 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -514/12 -N30 : point 54
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -514/12 -N31 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -514/12 -N36 : point 70
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -514/12 -N38 : points 68, 71
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -514/12 -N40 : point 39
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -515/14 : point 57
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -566/15 -N74 : point 51
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -566/15 -N75 : point 51
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -566/15 -N76 : point 51
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -566/15 -N77 : point 51
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -566/15 -N78 : point 51
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -187/15 : point 57
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -566/15 -N33 : point 49
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -566/15 -N34 : point 51
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -566/15 -N35 : point 51
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -52/16 -N79 : point 24
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -52/16 -N80 : point 24
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -52/16 -N73 : point 24
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -409/16 : point 26
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 19/07/2017

Date of the Opinion

• 25/07/2018

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

13/03/2019

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 155 from 06.05.2019, p.6

Application: OJ C 382 from 13.11.2017, p.28

Name of the parties

Gemeinsamer Betriebsrat EurothermenResort Bad Schallerbach

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Reinhardt-Kasperek, Sarah ; Denninger, Florian: Verstößt die beschränkte Anrechnung von Vordienstzeiten gegen die unionsrechtliche Arbeitnehmerfreizügigkeit ?, Betriebs-Berater 2019 N°37 p.2165-2168 (DE)
2. Tlamycha, Jan: Gemeinsamer Betriebsrat EurothermenResort Bad Schallerbach, Jurisprudence : specialista na komentování judikatury 2019 nº 2 p.54-55 (CS)
3. Driguez, Laetitia: Circulation des travailleurs - Récompense de l'ancienneté au travail, Europe 2019, n° 5 Mai, Comm. 197 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Oberster Gerichtshof - Austria

Subject-matter

• Freedom of movement for workers
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

Information not available

Judge-Rapporteur

Levits

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

• German
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

Information not available