Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 10 November 2016

Openbaar Ministerie v Halil Ibrahim Özçelik

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Rechtbank Amsterdam

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Urgent preliminary ruling procedure — Police and judicial cooperation in criminal matters — European arrest warrant — Framework Decision 2002/584/JHA — Article 8(1)(c) — Concept of ‘arrest warrant’ — Autonomous concept of EU law — National arrest warrant issued by a police service and confirmed by a public prosecutor for the purpose of criminal proceedings

Case C-453/16 PPU


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment (OJ)
16/12/2016 Özçelik
View pdf documents
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2016:860
10/11/2016 Özçelik
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment (Summary)
ECLI:EU:C:2016:860
10/11/2016 Özçelik
Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:2016:783
19/10/2016 Özçelik
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Application (OJ)
30/09/2016 Özçelik
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.06 Area of freedom, security and justice
    4.06.03 Judicial cooperation in criminal matters
      4.06.03.01 Harmonization of laws


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 16/08/2016

Date of the Opinion

  • 19/10/2016

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

10/11/2016


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 14 from 16.01.2017, p.17

Application: OJ C 383 from 17.10.2016, p.7

Name of the parties

Özçelik

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Rosanò, Alessandro: If You Are a Judicial Authority and You Know It, Raise Your Hands – Case Note on C-452/16 PPU, Poltorak, C-453/16 PPU, Özçelik, C-477/16 PPU, Kovalkovas, European Criminal Law Review 2017 p.89–98 (EN)
  2. Reijntjes, J.M.: Verzoek om een prejudiciële beslissing, ingediend door de Rechtbank Amsterdam (Nederland) bij uitspraak van 2 september 2016. Politiële en justiciële samenwerking in strafzaken. Europees aanhoudingsbevel. Begrip "rechterlijke beslissing". Begrip "uitvaardigende rechterlijke autoriteit". Europees aanhoudingsbevel dat door het ministerie van Justitie van de Republiek Litouwen is uitgevaardigd met het oog op uitvoering van een tot vrijheidsbeneming strekkende straf., Nederlandse jurisprudentie ; Uitspraken in burgerlijke en strafzaken 2017 nº 44 p.5848-5850 (NL)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Rechtbank Amsterdam - Netherlands

Subject-matter

  • area of freedom, security and justice
  • - judicial cooperation in criminal matters
  • - police cooperation

Procedure and result

  • Preliminary reference - urgent procedure

Formation of the Court

quatrième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Jürimäe

Advocate General

Campos Sánchez-Bordona

Language(s) of the Case

  • Dutch

Language(s) of the Opinion

  • Spanish