Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 23 November 2017

Servizi assicurativi del commercio estero SpA (SACE) and Sace BT SpA v European Commission

Appeal — State aid — Export credit insurance — Reinsurance cover provided by a public undertaking to its subsidiary — Capital contributions to cover the subsidiary’s losses — Notion of State aid — Imputability to the State — Private investor test

Case C-472/15 P



Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment (OJ)
05/01/2018 SACE and Sace BT v Commission
View pdf documents
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2017:885
23/11/2017 SACE and Sace BT v Commission
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment (Information)
ECLI:EU:C:2017:885
23/11/2017 SACE and Sace BT v Commission
Application (OJ)
30/10/2015 SACE and Sace BT v Commission
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general - 'Information on unpublished decisions' section)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.09 State aid
    4.09.01 Definition of aid
      4.09.01.01 Imputability to a public body
3 Legal proceedings
  3.10 Appeals
    3.10.06 Pleas in law
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.09 State aid
    4.09.04 Procedure for reviewing aid
      4.09.04.07 Commission decision following the formal investigation procedure
        4.09.04.07.00 General
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.09 State aid
    4.09.01 Definition of aid
      4.09.01.03 Advantage conferred on an undertaking
        4.09.01.03.01 Private investor/private creditor test
          4.09.01.03.01.00 General
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.09 State aid
    4.09.04 Procedure for reviewing aid
      4.09.04.06 Formal investigation procedure


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

  • TFEU, Article 107 -P1 : paragraphs 7, 13, 15, 20, 32, 83, 98, 100, 104
  • TFEU, Article 108 : paragraph 73
  • TFEU, Article 256 : paragraph 58
  • TFEU, Article 256 -P1L2 : paragraph 56
  • TFEU - Protocol No 3 -A48P2 : paragraph 95
  • TFEU - Protocol No 3 -A58L1 : paragraphs 56, 58
  • Directive 80/723 -A05 : paragraphs 102, 112
  • Secondary Legislation - Document published in the OJ C series- 31997Y0917(01) : paragraph 2
  • Secondary Legislation - Document published in the OJ C series- 31997Y0917(01) -PT2.5L1 : paragraph 4
  • Secondary Legislation - Document published in the OJ C series- 31997Y0917(01) -PT2.5L2 : paragraph 4
  • Secondary Legislation - Document published in the OJ C series- 31997Y0917(01) -PT4.2 : paragraph 3
  • Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A168P1LD : paragraph 58
  • Decision 2014/525 -A01 : paragraph 5
  • Decision 2014/525 -A02 : paragraph 5
  • Decision 2014/525 -A02L2 : paragraphs 1, 84
  • Decision 2014/525 -A03 : paragraph 5
  • Decision 2014/525 -A04 : paragraph 5
  • Decision 2014/525 -A05 : paragraph 5
  • Decision 2014/525 -A06 : paragraph 5
  • Decision 2014/525 -C17 : paragraph 65
  • Decision 2014/525 -C127 : paragraph 5
  • Decision 2014/525 -C128 : paragraph 5
  • Decision 2014/525 -C129 : paragraph 5
  • Decision 2014/525 -C130 : paragraph 5
  • Decision 2014/525 -C132 : paragraph 5
  • Decision 2014/525 -C168 : paragraph 5
  • Decision 2014/525 -C177 : paragraphs 5, 37, 38
  • Decision 2014/525 -C177LBLI : paragraphs 59, 61, 62
  • Decision 2014/525 -C178 : paragraphs 5, 43
  • Decision 2014/525 -C179 : paragraph 43
  • Commission - Other Acts - 52001XC0802(01) : paragraph 2
  • Commission - Other Acts - 52010XC1207(03) : paragraph 2
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -67/85 : paragraphs 18, 29
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/99 : paragraphs 15, 18, 29, 31, 32, 34, 35, 37, 42, 52, 53
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/99 -N50 : paragraph 34
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/99 -N51 : paragraph 34
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/99 -N52 : paragraph 34
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/99 -N55 : paragraphs 36, 40
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/99 -N56 : paragraphs 36, 41
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -390/06 -N54 : paragraphs 72, 76
  • General Court - Judgment T -268/06 -N55 : paragraph 73
  • General Court - Judgment T -268/06 -N56 : paragraph 72
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -333/07 -N81 : paragraph 76
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -124/10 : paragraph 107
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -124/10 -N82 : paragraph 107
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -124/10 -N83 : paragraph 107
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -124/10 -N84 : paragraph 107
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -124/10 -N86 : paragraph 107
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -224/12 : paragraph 107
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -224/12 -N36 : paragraph 101
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -242/13 : paragraph 52
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -242/13 -N31 : paragraph 34
  • General Court - Judgment T -305/13 : paragraphs 1 - 114
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -486/15 -N97 : paragraph 56
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -486/15 -N98 : paragraph 56
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -486/15 -N99 : paragraph 58

Operative part

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 04/09/2015

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

23/11/2017


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 22 from 22.01.2018, p.2

Application: OJ C 381 from 16.11.2015, p.19

Name of the parties

SACE and Sace BT v Commission

Notes on Academic Writings

Information not available



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • Competition
  • - State aid

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment
  • Appeals : dismissal on substantive grounds
  • Appeals : dismissal on grounds of inadmissibility

Formation of the Court

neuvième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Vajda

Advocate General

Wahl

Language(s) of the Case

  • Italian

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available