Pelham and Others
Case C-476/17
Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:2018:1002
12/12/2018 Pelham and Others
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Application (OJ)
29/09/2017 Pelham and Others
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

Information not available

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Information not available


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Information not available

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion

  • Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 11 : point 91
  • Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 13 : points 82, 91, 96, 99, 100
  • Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 53 : point 73
  • TFEU, Article 288 -L3 : point 78
  • Directive 96/9 -A05LA : point 38
  • Directive 96/9 -A07P1 : point 37
  • Decision 2000/278 : point 36
  • Directive 2001/29 : points 32, 38, 42, 51, 74, 83, 88
  • Directive 2001/29 -A02 : points 26, 29, 39, 47, 71, 76 - 79
  • Directive 2001/29 -A02LC : points 6, 16, 19, 40, 50, 52, 59, 75, 89, 99, 100
  • Directive 2001/29 -A03 : points 52, 71, 75, 77 - 79
  • Directive 2001/29 -A3 : point 100
  • Directive 2001/29 -A04 : points 52, 77 - 79, 100
  • Directive 2001/29 -A05 : points 52, 54, 56, 62, 71, 78, 79
  • Directive 2001/29 -A05P1 : point 77
  • Directive 2001/29 -A05P2 : points 16, 59, 77, 100
  • Directive 2001/29 -A05P2LB : point 55
  • Directive 2001/29 -A05P3 : points 59, 77
  • Directive 2001/29 -A05P3LD : points 7, 16, 53, 60, 64, 68, 69, 76, 100
  • Directive 2001/29 -A05P3LK : points 7, 53, 70, 76
  • Directive 2001/29 -A05P3LO : points 7, 57
  • Directive 2001/29 -A05P5 : points 7, 58
  • Directive 2001/29 -A10 : point 21
  • Directive 2001/29 -A10P1 : point 22
  • Directive 2001/29 -A10P2 : point 23
  • Directive 2001/29 -C15 : point 36
  • Directive 2001/29 -C31 : point 56
  • Directive 2001/29 -C32 : point 52
  • Directive 2001/2 -A05 : point 89
  • Directive 2006/115 : point 16
  • Directive 2006/115 -A09 : points 43, 47, 51, 71
  • Directive 2006/115 -A09P1LB : points 8, 16, 41, 42, 48 - 50, 71, 100
  • Directive 2006/115 -A10 : point 71
  • Directive 2006/115 -A10P2L1 : point 9
  • Directive 2006/115 -C2 : point 45
  • Directive 2006/115 -C7 : point 44
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -5/08 : point 34
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -5/08 -N1 : points 28, 29
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -5/08 -N27 : point 76
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -5/08 -N32 : point 76
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -5/08 -N39 : point 28
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -5/08 -N44 : point 29
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -5/08 -N45 : point 29
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -5/08 -N46 : point 29
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -145/10 -N122 : point 62
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -145/10 -N123 : point 62
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -399/11 -N59 : point 78
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -399/11 -N60 : point 73
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -399/11 -N63 : point 73
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -457/11 -N1 : point 23
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -435/12 -N26 : points 58, 77
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -435/12 -N27 : points 58, 77
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -201/13 : point 70
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -201/13 -N15 : point 76
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -201/13 -N27 : point 97
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -201/13 -N28 : point 97
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -201/13 -N29 : point 97
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -201/13 -N30 : point 97
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -201/13 -N31 : point 97
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -470/14 -N15 : point 55
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -470/14 -N16 : point 55
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -469/17 : point 94
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -469/17 -N38 : point 77
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -469/17 -N39 : point 77
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -149/17 -N44 : point 90
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -149/17 -N46 : point 98
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -161/17 -N16 : point 52


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 04/08/2017

Date of the Opinion

  • 12/12/2018

Date of the hearing

03/07/2018

Date of delivery

29/07/2019


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 347 from 16.10.2017, p.16

Name of the parties

Pelham and Others

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Rossa, Elisabeth: Kuntsfreiheit und Eigentumsschutz im Lichte des Europarechts, Multimedia und Recht 2017 p.665-670 (DE)
  2. Apel, Simon: EuGH: Unionsrechtliche Beurteilung des Tonträgersamplings "Metall auf Metall" - Schlussantrag, Multimedia und Recht 2019 N°2 p.97-99 (DE)
  3. Bently, Lionel ; Dussollier, Séverine ; Geiger, Christophe ; Griffiths, Jonathan ; Metzger, Axel ; Peukert, Alexander ; Senftleben, Martin: Sound Sampling, a Permitted Use Under EU Copyright Law? Opinion of the European Copyright Society in Relation to the Pending Reference before the CJEU in Case EUGH Aktenzeichen C-476/17, Pelham GmbH v. Hütter, International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law 2019 p.467-490 (EN)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Bundesgerichtshof - Germany

Subject-matter

  • Freedom of establishment
  • Freedom to provide services
  • Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  • Approximation of laws

Procedure and result

  • Reference for a preliminary ruling

Formation of the Court

Information not available

Judge-Rapporteur

Information not available

Advocate General

Szpunar

Language(s) of the Case

  • German

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available