Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 8 May 2019

RE v Praxair MRC

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Cour de cassation (France)

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 96/34/EC — Framework agreement on parental leave — Clause 2.6 — Worker employed full-time and for indefinite duration on part-time parental leave — Dismissal — Compensation payment for dismissal and redeployment leave allowance — Method of calculation — Article 157 TFEU — Equal pay for male and female workers — Part-time parental leave taken primarily by female workers — Indirect discrimination — Objective factors unrelated to any sex discrimination — None

Case C-486/18


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment (OJ)
21/06/2019 Praxair MRC
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2019:379
08/05/2019 Praxair MRC
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Application (OJ)
14/09/2018 Praxair MRC
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Information not available


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

  • TFEU, Article 157 : paragraphs 1, 28, 30, 66, 67, 72, 78, 79, 86, 87
  • TFEU, Article 157 -P2 : paragraphs 69, 70
  • TFEU, Article 288 : paragraph 36
  • TEU, Article 4 -P3 : paragraph 36
  • Directive 96/34 : paragraphs 3, 4
  • Directive 96/34 -C4 : paragraph 6
  • Directive 96/34 -C5 : paragraph 6
  • Directive 96/34 -C6 : paragraph 6
  • Directive 96/34 -NCL1 : paragraph 7
  • Directive 96/34 -NCL1PT1 : paragraph 41
  • Directive 96/34 -NCL1PT2 : paragraph 42
  • Directive 96/34 -NCL2 : paragraph 8
  • Directive 96/34 -NCL2PT4 : paragraphs 1, 27, 30, 31, 41, 44, 46
  • Directive 96/34 -NCL2PT5 : paragraph 41
  • Directive 96/34 -NCL2PT6 : paragraphs 1, 23, 26, 27, 30, 31, 44, 46, 48 - 50, 55, 58, 60, 62, 64, 65
  • Directive 96/34 -PRL1 : paragraphs 5, 41
  • Directive 97/81 -NCL4PT1 : paragraphs 9, 29
  • Directive 97/81 -NCL4PT2 : paragraphs 9, 29, 74
  • Directive 2010/18 -A04 : paragraph 3
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -43/75 -N39 : paragraph 67
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -43/75 -N40 : paragraph 68
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -262/88 -N13 : paragraph 71
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -399/92 -N20 : paragraph 79
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -342/93 -N16 : paragraph 73
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -256/01 -N45 : paragraph 68
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -284/02 -N25 : paragraph 67
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -537/07 : paragraph 75
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -116/08 : paragraphs 25, 29, 78
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -116/08 -N35 : paragraph 41
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -116/08 -N39 : paragraph 48
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -116/08 -N42 : paragraph 49
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -116/08 -N43 : paragraph 50
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -116/08 -N44 : paragraph 51
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -116/08 -N47 : paragraph 57
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -116/08 -N51 : paragraph 52
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -116/08 -N55 : paragraph 53
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -116/08 -N56 : paragraph 54
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -124/11 -N35 : paragraph 70
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12 -N89 : paragraph 35
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -588/12 : paragraph 25
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -588/12 -N30 : paragraph 41
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -588/12 -N43 : paragraph 48
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -173/13 -N40 : paragraph 79
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -173/13 -N41 : paragraph 80
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -335/15 -N39 : paragraph 73
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -312/17 -N33 : paragraph 70
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -312/17 -N35 : paragraph 71
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -384/17 -N57 : paragraph 36
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -384/17 -N58 : paragraph 37
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -384/17 -N59 : paragraph 38
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -621/18 -N26 : paragraph 33
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -621/18 -N27 : paragraph 34

Operative part

  • Interprets : TFEU, Article 157
  • Interprets : Directive 96/34 -NCL2PT6

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 23/07/2018

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

08/05/2019


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 352 from 01.10.2018, p.26

Name of the parties

Praxair MRC

Notes on Academic Writings

Information not available



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Cour de cassation - France

Subject-matter

  • Social policy

Procedure and result

  • Reference for a preliminary ruling

Formation of the Court

première chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Safjan

Advocate General

Pitruzzella

Language(s) of the Case

  • French

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available