Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 11 July 2019

CS and Others v České aerolinie a.s.

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Městský soud v Praze

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Transport — Common rules on compensation and assistance to passengers in the event of denied boarding and of cancellation or long delay of flights — Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 — Article 5(1)(c) — Article 7(1) — Right to compensation — Connecting flights — Flights consisting of two flights operated by different air carriers — Long delay in relation to the second flight with points of departure and arrival outside the European Union and operated by a carrier established in a non-Member State)

Case C-502/18


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment (OJ)
23/08/2019 České aerolinie
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2019:604
11/07/2019 České aerolinie
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Application (OJ)
07/09/2018 České aerolinie
Request for a preliminary ruling
30/07/2018 České aerolinie
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Information not available


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

  • TFEU, Article 267 : paragraph 11
  • Regulation 261/2004 : paragraph 32
  • Regulation 261/2004 -A02LB : paragraphs 3, 20, 22
  • Regulation 261/2004 -A02LC : paragraphs 3, 9
  • Regulation 261/2004 -A03P1 : paragraph 4
  • Regulation 261/2004 -A03P1LA : paragraph 17
  • Regulation 261/2004 -A03P5 : paragraphs 1, 4, 10, 11, 15, 33
  • Regulation 261/2004 -A05P1LC : paragraphs 5, 15, 19, 20, 25, 33
  • Regulation 261/2004 -A05P3 : paragraphs 20, 25
  • Regulation 261/2004 -A05P3SNT2 : paragraphs 14, 28
  • Regulation 261/2004 -A07P1 : paragraphs 6, 15, 19, 25, 33
  • Regulation 261/2004 -A07P1LC : paragraphs 10, 13
  • Regulation 261/2004 -A13 : paragraphs 7, 31
  • Regulation 261/2004 -C1 : paragraph 30
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -402/07 -N61 : paragraph 19
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -581/10 -N38 : paragraph 19
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -11/11 : paragraph 11
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -302/16 -N29 : paragraph 31
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -532/17 -N18 : paragraph 23
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -537/17 -N18 : paragraph 16
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -537/17 -N19 : paragraph 16
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -537/17 -N25 : paragraph 16

Operative part

  • Interprets : Regulation 261/2004 -A03P5
  • Interprets : Regulation 261/2004 -A05P1LC
  • Interprets : Regulation 261/2004 -A07P1

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 30/07/2018

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

11/07/2019


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 305 from 09.09.2019, p.26

Application: OJ C 341 from 24.09.2018, p.9

Name of the parties

České aerolinie

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Flöthmann, Marc: Ausgleichsanspruch bei Verspätung nach Zwischenstopp in Drittstaat, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2019 p.742-746 (NL)
  2. Michel, Valérie: Indemnisation en cas de vol avec correspondance, Europe 2019 Mois Comm. nº 10 p.30-31 (FR)
  3. Augros, Valérie: Retard d'un vol en code share : qui est redevable de l'indemnisation standardisée ?, Gazette du Palais 2019 nº I Jur. p.20-22 (FR)
  4. Grigorieff, Cyril-Igor: Arrêts Aegean et České aerolinie : le règlement 261/2004 à nouveau interprété, Revue européenne de droit de la consommation 2020 p.363-368 (FR)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Městský soud v Praze - Czech Republic

Subject-matter

  • Transport

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Reference for a preliminary ruling

Formation of the Court

neuvième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Šváby

Advocate General

Pikamäe

Language(s) of the Case

  • Czech

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available