Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• TFEU, Article 288 -L3 : paragraph 32
• TEU, Article 4 -P3L2 : paragraph 30
• Directive 2005/29 -A01 : paragraph 4
• Directive 2005/29 -A02 : paragraph 5
• Directive 2005/29 -A02LC : paragraph 43
• Directive 2005/29 -A02LI : paragraphs 51, 52, 60
• Directive 2005/29 -A03 : paragraph 23
• Directive 2005/29 -A05 : paragraph 6
• Directive 2005/29 -A06 : paragraphs 1, 7, 23
• Directive 2005/29 -A06P1 : paragraphs 36, 37, 42, 45, 49, 72
• Directive 2005/29 -A07 : paragraphs 1, 8, 23, 28, 50, 51, 63, 64
• Directive 2005/29 -A07P1 : paragraphs 23, 24, 27, 35, 42, 53, 58, 62
• Directive 2005/29 -A07P2 : paragraphs 23, 42, 54, 58, 62, 72
• Directive 2005/29 -A07P3 : paragraphs 23, 24, 27, 35, 58, 61, 69
• Directive 2005/29 -A07P4 : paragraphs 23, 51, 56, 58, 66 - 72
• Directive 2005/29 -C5 : paragraphs 3, 25
• Directive 2005/29 -C6 : paragraphs 3, 25
• Directive 2005/29 -C11 : paragraph 3
• Directive 2005/29 -C12 : paragraph 3
• Directive 2005/29 -C14 : paragraphs 3, 68
• Directive 2005/29 -C18 : paragraph 3
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -14/83 -N26 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -397/01 -N113 : paragraph 32
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -397/01 -N114 : paragraph 33
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -397/01 -N117 : paragraph 34
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -261/07 -N51 : paragraph 25
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -261/07 -N52 : paragraph 26
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/10 -N22 : paragraph 39
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/10 -N24 : paragraphs 51, 56
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/10 -N32 : paragraph 52
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/10 -N45 : paragraph 60
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/10 -N52 : paragraph 58
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/10 -N53 : paragraph 58
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/10 -N58 : paragraph 58
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/10 -N66 : paragraph 69
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/10 -N67 : paragraph 69
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/10 -N68 : paragraph 70
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -177/10 -N51 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -177/10 -N52 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -435/11 -N43 : paragraph 38
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/14 -N30 : paragraph 30
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/14 -N31 : paragraphs 32, 34

Operative part

• Interprets : Directive 2005/29 -A06P1
• Interprets : Directive 2005/29 -A07
• Interprets : Directive 2005/29 -A07P1
• Interprets : Directive 2005/29 -A07P2
• Interprets : Directive 2005/29 -A07P3
• Interprets : Directive 2005/29 -A07P4

Opinion

Information not available

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 23/12/2014

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

26/10/2016

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 6 from 09.01.2017, p.8

Application: OJ C 73 from 02.03.2015, p.18

Name of the parties

Canal Digital Danmark

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Alexander, Christian: EuGH: Unzureichende Informationen über Entgelte für Fernseh-Abonnement, Gewerblicher Rechtsschutz und Urheberrecht PRAX 2016 p.541 (DE)
2. Simon, Denys: D'importantes précisions à la fois sur les obligations en matière de mise en oeuvre des directives et sur les exigences du droit de l'Union en matière d'information du consommateur, en vue d'exclure les omissions trompeuses dans les spots télévisés et le renvoi à des dites internet, Europe 2016 Décembre Comm. nº 12 p.40-41 (FR)
3. Simon, Denys: Pratiques commerciales déloyales, Europe 2016 Décembre nº 12 p.40-41 (FR)
4. Straetmans, Gert: Case Canal Digital Danmark: On misleading practices, the limitations of the communication medium used and the divergent levels of attention of consumers, European Journal of Consumer Law 2016 p.329-341 (EN)
5. Geerts, P.G.F.A.: Intellectuele eigendom & Reclamerecht 2017 p.154-155 (NL)
6. Woller, Michael: EuGH zur Irreführung durch Hervorhebung einzelner Preisbestandteile in der Werbung, Ecolex 2017 p.56 (DE)
7. Skubic, Zoran: Zavajajoča prodaja televizijskih paketov po pravu Unije, Pravna praksa 2017 nº 9 p.29-30 (SL)
8. Verbiest, Pauline: Arrest Canal Digital: naar een bescherming van de real life-consument bij oneerlijke handelspraktijken?, Droit de la consommation 2017 p.54-70V (NL)
9. Verbiest, P.: Arrest Canal Digital: naar een bescherming van de real life-consument bij oneerlijke handelspraktijken?, Tijdschrift voor consumentenrecht en handelspraktijken 2017 p.263-271 (NL)
10. Pappalardo, Chiara: L'inganno sul prezzo nella prassi dell'Autorità Garante della Concorrenza e del Mercato e nella giurisprudenza del Giurì di Autodisciplina pubblicitaria, Rivista di diritto industriale 2017 6 p.625-650 (IT)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Retten i Glostrup - Denmark

Subject-matter

• Approximation of laws
  
• Consumer protection
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  
• Reference for a preliminary ruling : case not proceeding to judgment
  

Formation of the Court

Information not available

Judge-Rapporteur

Borg Barthet

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

• Danish
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

Information not available