Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 16 June 2015

Peter Gauweiler and Others v Deutscher Bundestag

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverfassungsgericht

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Economic and monetary policy — Decisions of the Governing Council of the European Central Bank (ECB) on a number of technical features regarding the Eurosystem’s outright monetary transactions in secondary sovereign bond markets — Articles 119 TFEU and 127 TFEU — Powers conferred on the ECB and the European System of Central Banks — Monetary policy transmission mechanism — Maintenance of price stability — Proportionality — Article 123 TFEU — Prohibition of monetary financing of Member States in the euro area

Case C-62/14


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment (OJ)
07/08/2015 Gauweiler and Others
View pdf documents
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2015:400
16/06/2015 Gauweiler and Others
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment (Summary)
ECLI:EU:C:2015:400
16/06/2015 Gauweiler and Others
Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:2015:7
14/01/2015 Gauweiler and Others
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Application (OJ)
04/04/2014 Gauweiler and Others
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
3 Legal proceedings
  3.04 Reference for a preliminary ruling
    3.04.01 Reference to the Court of Justice
      3.04.01.03 Exclusive nature of the role of the national court in making the reference
3 Legal proceedings
  3.04 Reference for a preliminary ruling
    3.04.02 Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice
3 Legal proceedings
  3.04 Reference for a preliminary ruling
    3.04.03 Effects of a preliminary ruling
      3.04.03.01 Rulings providing an interpretation
3 Legal proceedings
  3.04 Reference for a preliminary ruling
    3.04.03 Effects of a preliminary ruling
      3.04.03.02 Rulings determining validity
3 Legal proceedings
  3.04 Reference for a preliminary ruling
    3.04.02 Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice
3 Legal proceedings
  3.04 Reference for a preliminary ruling
    3.04.02 Jurisdiction of the Court of Justice
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.12 Economic and monetary policy
    4.12.02 Monetary policy
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.12 Economic and monetary policy
    4.12.02 Monetary policy
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.12 Economic and monetary policy
    4.12.04 European System of Central Banks
2 Institutional framework of the European Union
  2.05 Legal acts of the European Union
    2.05.06 Statement of reasons
1 The legal order of the European Union
  1.01 Sources of EU law
    1.01.02 General principles of law
      1.01.02.06 Principle of proportionality
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.12 Economic and monetary policy
    4.12.02 Monetary policy
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.12 Economic and monetary policy
    4.12.02 Monetary policy
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.12 Economic and monetary policy
    4.12.02 Monetary policy
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.12 Economic and monetary policy
    4.12.04 European System of Central Banks


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

  • EC Treaty (Maastricht), Article 104 : paragraph 99
  • EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 101 : paragraph 99
  • TFEU - Protocol No 4 : paragraph 44
  • TFEU - Protocol No 4 -A12P1 : paragraphs 38, 39
  • TFEU - Protocol No 4 -A14P1 : paragraph 39
  • TFEU - Protocol No 4 -A17 : paragraphs 1, 10, 30, 32, 127
  • TFEU - Protocol No 4 -A18 : paragraphs 1, 10, 30, 32, 127
  • TFEU - Protocol No 4 -A18P1 : paragraphs 54, 96, 118
  • TFEU - Protocol No 4 -A19 : paragraphs 1, 10, 30, 32, 127
  • TFEU - Protocol No 4 -A20 : paragraphs 1, 10, 30, 32, 127
  • TFEU - Protocol No 4 -A21 : paragraphs 1, 10, 30, 32, 127
  • TFEU - Protocol No 4 -A22 : paragraphs 1, 10, 30, 32, 127
  • TFEU - Protocol No 4 -A23 : paragraphs 1, 10, 30, 32, 127
  • TFEU - Protocol No 4 -A24 : paragraphs 1, 10, 30, 32, 127
  • TFEU - Protocol No 4 -A33 : paragraph 125
  • TFEU, Article 3 -P1LC : paragraph 35
  • TFEU, Article 119 : paragraph 27
  • TFEU, Article 119 -P2 : paragraphs 34, 48, 59, 66, 109
  • TFEU, Article 119 -P3 : paragraph 61
  • TFEU, Article 123 : paragraphs 1, 10, 99, 100, 101
  • TFEU, Article 123 -P1 : paragraphs 30, 32, 93, 94, 97, 102, 109, 121, 127
  • TFEU, Article 127 : paragraphs 1, 36
  • TFEU, Article 127 -P1 : paragraphs 10, 30, 32, 43, 50, 59, 61, 66, 109, 127
  • TFEU, Article 127 -P2 : paragraphs 10, 30, 32, 37, 127
  • TFEU, Article 128 : paragraph 36
  • TFEU, Article 129 : paragraph 36
  • TFEU, Article 129 -P1 : paragraph 38
  • TFEU, Article 130 : paragraphs 36, 40
  • TFEU, Article 131 : paragraph 36
  • TFEU, Article 132 : paragraph 36
  • TFEU, Article 133 : paragraph 36
  • TFEU, Article 138 : paragraph 36
  • TFEU, Article 263 : paragraph 29
  • TFEU, Article 267 : paragraphs 15, 28, 29
  • TFEU, Article 267 -L1LB : paragraph 10
  • TFEU, Article 282 -P1 : paragraph 36
  • TFEU, Article 282 -P2 : paragraphs 43, 59, 109
  • TFEU, Article 282 -P4 : paragraph 36
  • TFEU, Article 296 -P2 : paragraph 70
  • TEU, Article 3 : paragraph 43
  • TEU, Article 5 -P2 : paragraph 41
  • TEU, Article 5 -P4 : paragraph 66
  • Regulation 3603/93 -C7 : paragraph 101
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -364/92 -N9 : paragraph 15
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -346/93 : paragraphs 12, 14
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -346/93 -N23 : paragraph 12
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -346/93 -N24 : paragraph 12
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -415/93 -N65 : paragraph 28
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -435/97 -N31 : paragraph 15
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -402/98 -N29 : paragraph 15
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -446/98 -N49 : paragraph 16
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -79/99 -N22 : paragraph 26
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -11/00 -N134 : paragraph 40
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -11/00 -N135 : paragraph 41
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -491/01 -N36 : paragraph 29
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -491/01 -N40 : paragraph 29
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -119/05 -N43 : paragraphs 15, 26
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -217/05 -N21 : paragraph 13
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -308/06 -N33 : paragraph 29
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -308/06 -N34 : paragraph 29
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -11/07 -N52 : paragraph 15
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -48/07 -N24 : paragraph 13
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -173/09 -N29 : paragraph 16
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -343/09 -N28 : paragraph 68
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -416/10 -N58 : paragraph 28
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -59/11 -N38 : paragraph 67
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -399/11 -N28 : paragraph 24
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -399/11 -N29 : paragraph 25
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -63/12 -N98 : paragraph 70
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -63/12 -N99 : paragraph 70
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -203/12 -N35 : paragraph 68
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12 -N123 : paragraph 94
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12 -N132 : paragraph 95
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12 -N133 : paragraph 98
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12 -N48 : paragraph 34
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12 -N49 : paragraph 36
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12 -N50 : paragraph 35
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12 -N53 : paragraphs 42, 46
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12 -N54 : paragraph 43
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12 -N55 : paragraph 46
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12 -N56 : paragraphs 51, 52, 64
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12 -N60 : paragraph 63
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -62/14 : paragraphs 102, 108

Operative part

  • Interprets : TFEU, Article 119
  • Interprets : TFEU, Article 123 -P1
  • Interprets : TFEU, Article 127 -P1
  • Interprets : TFEU, Article 127 -P2
  • Interprets : TFEU - Protocol No 4 -A17
  • Interprets : TFEU - Protocol No 4 -A18
  • Interprets : TFEU - Protocol No 4 -A19
  • Interprets : TFEU - Protocol No 4 -A20
  • Interprets : TFEU - Protocol No 4 -A21
  • Interprets : TFEU - Protocol No 4 -A22
  • Interprets : TFEU - Protocol No 4 -A23
  • Interprets : TFEU - Protocol No 4 -A24

Opinion

  • TFEU - Protocol No 4 : point 13
  • TFEU - Protocol No 4 -A17 : point 26
  • TFEU - Protocol No 4 -A18P1 : points 113, 119, 120
  • TFEU - Protocol No 4 -A24 : point 26
  • TFEU, Article 119 : points 26, 92, 203, 263
  • TFEU, Article 119 -P1 : points 125, 126
  • TFEU, Article 119 -P2 : point 107
  • TFEU, Article 123 : points 26, 131, 215 - 221, 225, 231
  • TFEU, Article 123 -P1 : points 204, 205, 214 - 242, 247 - 254, 262, 263
  • TFEU, Article 125 : points 131, 215, 219, 220
  • TFEU, Article 126 : point 217
  • TFEU, Article 127 -P1 : points 26, 92, 107, 127, 130, 154, 203, 215, 263
  • TFEU, Article 127 -P2 : points 26, 92, 203, 263
  • TFEU, Article 130 : point 12
  • TFEU, Article 267 : point 4
  • TFEU, Article 267 -L1LB : point 26
  • TFEU, Article 282 : point 215
  • TFEU, Article 282 -P2 : points 107, 127, 130, 154
  • TFEU, Article 282 -P3 : point 108
  • TFEU, Article 296 -P2 : point 165
  • TEU, Article 5 -P4 : points 124, 161
  • TFEU, Article 123 : point 10
  • TFEU, Article 127 : point 11
  • Regulation 3603/93 : points 14, 226
  • Regulation 3603/93 -C7 : point 226
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -24/62 -N143 : point 165
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -8/66 -N91 : point 72
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -22/70 : points 78, 80
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -133/79 -N12 : point 72
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -133/79 -N19 : point 72
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -136/79 -N28 : point 171
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -136/79 -N30 : point 171
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -182/80 -N18 : point 72
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -322/88 -N8 : point 74
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -322/88 -N9 : point 74
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -331/88 -N13 : point 177
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -366/88 : point 80
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -188/91 -N18 : point 74
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -314/96 -N19 : point 36
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -164/98 -N33 : point 165
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -94/00 -N77 : point 171
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -180/00 -N103 : point 177
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -147/02 -N54 : point 36
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -11/05 -N38 : point 72
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -11/05 -N41 : point 72
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -266/05 -N32 : point 111
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -266/05 -N34 : point 111
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/07 -N57 : point 111
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -58/08 -N52 : point 111
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10 -N42 : point 36
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12 : points 94, 101, 127, 216
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12 -N135 : points 131, 219
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12 -N55 : point 127
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/12 -N56 : point 129
  • Court of Justice - View C-370/12 -N142 : point 131
  • Court of Justice - View C-370/12 -N143 : point 131
  • Court of Justice - View C-370/12 -N85 : point 129


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 10/02/2014

Date of the Opinion

  • 14/01/2015

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

16/06/2015


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 279 from 24.08.2015, p.12

Application: OJ C 129 from 28.04.2014, p.11

Name of the parties

Gauweiler and Others

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. : An unintended side-effect of Draghi’s bazooka: An opportunity to establish a more balanced relationship between the ECJ and Member States’ highest courts, Common Market Law Review 2014 p.375-387 (EN)
  2. Cărămidariu, Dan: Mecanisme de stabilitate și programe de salvare, Revista românã de drept european 2014 nº 2 p.75-98 (RO)
  3. Snell, Jukka: Gauweiler: some institutional aspects, European Law Review 2015 p.133-134 (EN)
  4. Schmidt, Reiner: Die entfesselte EZB, Juristenzeitung 2015 p.317-327 (DE)
  5. Binder, Jens-Hinrich: Drohende Zentralbankinsolvenz?, Juristenzeitung 2015 p.328-336 (DE)
  6. Mayer, Franz C.: Die EZB vor Gericht – nächste Runde, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2015 p.121-122 (DE)
  7. Poppelaars, Suzanne: Conclusie OMT-programma. De dans tussen de ECB, het Bundesverfassungsgericht en het Hof va Justitie. Economen bestempelen de verklaring va Draghi "to do whatever it takes" vaak als de redding van de euro, Nederlands juristenblad 2015 p.420-428 (NL)
  8. Herrmann, Christoph ; Dornacher, Corinna: Grünes Licht vom EuGH für EZB-Staatsanleihenkäufe – ein Lob der Sachlichkeit!, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2015 p.579-583 (DE)
  9. Snell, Jukka: Gauweiler: What Next, European Law Review 2015 p.473-474 (EN)
  10. Wutscher, Claudia: Zur unionsrechtlichen Zulässigkeit von Staatsanleihenkäufen durch die EZB, Zeitschrift für Europarecht, internationales Privatrecht und Rechtsvergleichung 2015 p.155-161 (DE)
  11. Anagnostaras, Georgios: In ECB we trust... the FCC we dare! The OMT preliminary ruling, European Law Review 2015 p.744-762 (EN)
  12. Adamski, Dariusz : Economic constitution of the euro area after the Gauweiler preliminary ruling, Common Market Law Review 2015 p.1451–1490 (EN)
  13. Hinarejos, Alicia: Gauweiler and the Outright Monetary Transactions Programme: The Mandate of the European Central Bank and the Changing Nature of Economic and Monetary Union, European Constitutional Law Review 2015 Vol. 3 p.563 - 576 (EN)
  14. Frenz, Walter: EZB ist zum Ankauf von Staatsanleihen berechtigt, Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt 2015 p.978-980 (DE)
  15. Faraguna, Pietro: Quaderni costituzionali 2015 p.798-801 (IT)
  16. Vuksanović, Igor: Zelena luč za centralne bankirje, Pravna praksa 2015 nº 27 p.28-29 (SL)
  17. Pignarre, Pierre-Emmanuel: Anatomie d'une première : l'arrêt de la Cour de justice sur renvoi préjudiciel de la Cour constitutionnelle allemande, Constitutions : revue de droit constitutionnel appliqué 2015 p.371-375 (FR)
  18. Klement, Jan Henrik: Der geldpolitische Kompetenzmechanismus - Sind die Outright-Geschäfte der EZB zugleich rechtmäßig und rechtswidrig? – Zum Urteil des EuGH vom 16. 6. 2015, Juristenzeitung 2015 p.754-760 (DE)
  19. Baraggia, Antonia: Corte di giustizia dell'Unione europea, Grande Sezione, sentenza 16 giugno 2015, in causa C-62/14, Peter Gauweiler e altri c. Deutscher Bundestag, Rivista italiana di diritto pubblico comunitario 2015 p.1790-1793 (IT)
  20. Scherer, Peter: European Monetary Policy – What Works Legally and What Doesn’t? The ECJ’s Judgment Regarding the OMT Programme, European Law Reporter 2015 p.106-112 (EN)
  21. Ordóñez Solís, David: La participación de Alemania en la Unión Económica y Monetaria: Sentencia Gauweiler, Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto 2015 nº 53 p.198-201 (ES)
  22. Martucci, Francesco: Cour de justice, gde ch., 16 juin 2015, Peter Gauweiler et al. c/ Deutscher Bundestag, aff. C-62/14, ECLI:EU:C:2015:400, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2015 (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2015 p.966-970 (FR)
  23. Ohler, Christoph: Rechtliche Maßstäbe der Geldpolitik nach dem Gauweiler-Urteil des EuGH, Neue Zeitschrift für Verwaltungsrecht 2015 p.1001-1007 (DE)
  24. Classen, Claus Dieter: Funktionsadäquate checks and balances statt richterliche Vollkontrolle unter demokratischem Vorwand, Europarecht 2015 Heft 4 p.477-486 (DE)
  25. Mayer, Franz C.: Zurück zur Rechtsgemeinschaft: Das OMT-Urteil des EuGH, Neue juristische Wochenschrift 2015 Heft 28 p.1999-2003 (DE)
  26. Martucci, Francesco: La Cour de justice face à la politique monétaire en temps de crise de dettes souveraines : L’arrêt Gauweiler entre droit et marché, Cahiers de droit européen 2015 p.493-534 (FR)
  27. Frenz, Walter: Ultra-vires-Kontrolle kraft Europarechts - Das Schrems-Urteil des EuGH im Vergleich zum OMT-Beschluss des BVerfG, Europäisches Wirtschafts- & Steuerrecht - EWS 2015 Heft 5 p.257-262 (DE)
  28. Bonneau, Thierry: Programme sur les opérations monétaires sur titres : la CJUE conforte la BCE, La Semaine Juridique - édition générale 2015 nº 29 p.1426-1428 (FR)
  29. Hervé, Alan: « Europarechtsfreundlich » oder « Deutschlandrechtsfreundlich » ?, Revue des affaires européennes 2015 p.439-449 (FR)
  30. Christofi, Athena: Politique économique et monétaire - Banque centrale européenne (BCE) - attribution des compétences, Revue du droit de l'Union européenne 2015 nº 4 p.661-668 (FR)
  31. Lettanie, Ute: De OMT-saga en de ECB: groen licht bij het Hof van Justice, knipperlicht bij het Bundesverfassungsgericht, Tijdschrift voor bestuurswetenschappen en publiekrecht 2016 p.92-97 (NL)
  32. Craig, Paul ; Markakis, Menelaos: Gauweiler and the Legality of Outright Monetary Transactions, European Law Review 2016 p.4-24 (EN)
  33. Borger, Vestert: Outright Monetary Transactions and the stability mandate of the ECB: Gauweiler, Common Market Law Review 2016 p. 139–196 (EN)
  34. Pliakos, Asteris: I archi tis mi nomismatikis chrimatodotisis ton elleimmaton kata to Evropaiko Syntagma, Nomiko Vima 2016 p.13-22 (EL)
  35. Denninger, Erhard: L'identità costituzionale tedesca e l'Unione europea : riflessioni a partire dalla pronuncia sulle OMT, Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo 2016 p.261-273 (IT)
  36. Sarmiento, Daniel: La sentencia Gauweiler (C-62/14) del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea, sobre el programa de compra de deuda pública del Banco Central Europeo, Revista española de Derecho Europeo 2016 nº 57 p.63-74 (ES)
  37. Prevedourou, Evgenia V.: Nomologiakes diefkriniseis os pros tis proypotheseis tou paradektou tis aitisis prodikastikis apofasis (me aformi tis apofaseis tou DEE C-62/14, Gauweiler, kai C-5/14 Kernkraftwerke Lippe - Ems GmbH, Theoria & praxi Dioikitikou Dikaiou 2016 p.401-415 (EL)
  38. Sander, Florian: CASE C-62/14--GAUWEILER AND OTHERS: THE LIMITS OF MONETARY POLICY IN LIGHT OF THE OUTRIGHT MONETARY TRANSACTIONS (OMT) PROGRAM, The Columbia Journal of European Law 2016 p.00 (EN)
  39. Feld, Lars P. ; Fuest, Clemens ; Haucap, Justus ; Schweitzer, Heike ; Wieland, Volker ; Wigger, Berthold U.: Das entgrenzte Mandat der EZB - Das OMT-Urteil des EuGH und seine Folgen, Das entgrenzte Mandat der EZB - Das OMT-Urteil des EuGH und seine Folgen (Ed. Stiftung Marktwirtschaft - Berlin) 2016 (DE)
  40. Tridimas, Takis ; Xanthoulis, Napoleon: A Legal Analysis of the Gauweiler Case: Between Monetary Policy and Constitutional Conflict, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 2016 p.17-39 (EN)
  41. Sarmiento, Daniel: The Luxembourg ‘Double Look’: The Advocate General’s Opinion and the Judgment in the Gauweiler Case, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 2016 p.40-54 (EN)
  42. Baroncelli, Stefania: The Gauweiler Judgment in View of the Case Law of the European Court of Justice on European Central Bank Independence: Between Substance and Form, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 2016 p.79-98 (EN)
  43. Wieland, Joachim: Das Kooperationsverhältnis vor der Bewährung: Bundesverfassungsgericht, Europäischer Gerichtshof und die Europäische Zentralbank, Nationalstaat und Europäische Union, Liber Amicorum für Joachim Jens Hesse (Ed. Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden 2016) 2016 p.169-180 (DE)
  44. De Serière, V.P.G.: Nederlandse jurisprudentie ; Uitspraken in burgerlijke en strafzaken 2016 Afl.38 p.4942-4944 (NL)
  45. Jarašiūnas, Egidijus: Apie bylų Melloni, Jeremy F. ir Gauweiler ir kt. įnašą į Europos Sąjungos Teisingumo Teismo ir konstitucinių teismų bendradarbiavimo plėtotę, Konstitucinė jurisprudencija 2016 2 p.218-275 (LT)
  46. Sander, Florian: BVerfG, EuGH und EZB im OMT-Verfahren – Wer bietet der Notenbank die Stirn?, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2016 p.614-617 (DE)
  47. Bainczyk, Magdalena: Problemy hybrydowej oceny aktów unijnego prawa pochodnego w świetle wyroku niemieckiego Federalnego Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z 21.06.2016 r. w sprawie decyzji OMT, Europejski Przegląd Sądowy 2016 Vol. 11 p.27-34 (PL)
  48. Palmstorfer, Rainer: Judicial Control of the ECB by the CJEU, Exemplified by the OMT Judgment, Österreichische Zeitschrift für öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 2016 p.449-467 (EN)
  49. Kaufmann, Sven: Le Bundesverfassungsgericht et les limites à la primauté du droit de l'Union. Confrontation ou complémentarité dans l'intégration européenne ?, Revue trimestrielle de droit européen 2017 p.59-73 (FR)
  50. Payandeh, Mehrdad: The OMT judgment of the German Federal Constitutional Court: repositioning the court within the European constitutional architecture, European Constitutional Law Review 2017 Vol. 13 p.400-416 (EN)
  51. Faraguna, Pietro: La saga OMT : il diritto all'ultima parola tra Corte di giustizia e tribunali costituzionali, Giurisprudenza costituzionale 2017 p.567-600 (IT)
  52. Pace, Lorenzo Federico: The OMT case, the "intergovernmental drift" of the Eurozone crisis and the (inevitable) rectification of the BVerfG jurisprudence in light of the ECJ's Gauweiler judgment, Il diritto dell'Unione Europea 2017 p.155-172 (EN)
  53. Schriewer, Berenike: The German Federal Constitutional Court's First Reference for a Preliminary Ruling to the European Court of Justice: A 2016 Follow-Up, German Yearbook of International Law 2017 nº 59 p.533-539 (EN)
  54. Calliess, Christian: Neue juristische Wochenschrift 2017 p.3073-3074 (DE)
  55. Steinbach, Armin: All’s well that ends well? Crisis policy after the German constitutional court’s ruling in Gauweiler, Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 2017 p.140–149 (EN)
  56. Grégoire, Guillaume: La banque centrale européenne et la crise des dettes souveraines : politique monétaire, politique économique ou Etat d'exception ?, Revue internationale de droit économique 2017 p.33-54 (FR)
  57. Wieland, Joachim: Die Europäische Union als Rechtsgemeinschaft, Recht und Realitat - Festschrift für Christoph Vedder (Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden) 2017 p.242-254 (DE)



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Bundesverfassungsgericht - Germany

Subject-matter

  • Economic and monetary policy
  • - European Central Bank (ECB)
  • - Euro

Procedure and result

  • Reference for a preliminary ruling

Formation of the Court

grande chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Bay Larsen

Advocate General

Cruz Villalón

Language(s) of the Case

  • German

Language(s) of the Opinion

  • Spanish