Judgment of the Court (Second Chamber) of 28 March 2019

Cogeco Communications Inc v Sport TV Portugal SA and Others

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Lisboa

Reference for a preliminary ruling — Article 102 TFEU — Principles of equivalence and effectiveness — Directive 2014/104/EU — Article 9(1) — Article 10(2) to (4) — Articles 21 and 22 — Actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union — Effects of national decisions — Limitation periods — Transposition — Temporal application

Case C-637/17


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2019:263
28/03/2019 Cogeco Communications
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Opinion
ECLI:EU:C:2019:32
17/01/2019 Cogeco Communications
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Application (OJ)
12/01/2018 Cogeco Communications
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Information not available


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

  • TFEU, Article 101 : paragraph 4
  • TFEU, Article 102 : paragraphs 1, 4, 16, 17, 19, 37 - 40, 42, 44, 47, 55, 56, 58 - 60
  • TFEU, Article 267 : paragraph 35
  • TFEU, Article 288 -L3 : paragraph 23
  • 3192014L0104 -A21P1 : paragraph 1
  • 3192014L0104 -A22 : paragraph 1
  • Regulation 1/2003 -A03P1 : paragraph 4
  • Directive 2014/104 : paragraphs 11, 22, 23, 25, 29, 31
  • Directive 2014/104 -A01P1 : paragraph 3
  • Directive 2014/104 -A02 : paragraph 4
  • Directive 2014/104 -A09P1 : paragraphs 1, 5, 23
  • Directive 2014/104 -A10 : paragraph 23
  • Directive 2014/104 -A10P2 : paragraphs 1, 6, 23
  • Directive 2014/104 -A10P3 : paragraphs 1, 6, 23
  • Directive 2014/104 -A10P4 : paragraphs 1, 6, 23
  • Directive 2014/104 -A21 : paragraphs 8, 26, 30, 33
  • Directive 2014/104 -A21P1 : paragraphs 7, 8, 23
  • Directive 2014/104 -A22 : paragraphs 8, 23, 24, 34
  • Directive 2014/104 -A22P1 : paragraphs 26, 30, 33
  • Directive 2014/104 -A22P2 : paragraphs 27, 28
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N20 : paragraph 38
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N21 : paragraph 39
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N22 : paragraph 40
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N23 : paragraph 41
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N24 : paragraph 42
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N25 : paragraph 43
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N26 : paragraph 44
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -74/16 -N36 : paragraph 35
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -334/16 -N38 : paragraph 57

Operative part

  • Interprets : TFEU, Article 102
  • Interprets : Directive 2014/104 -A22

Opinion

  • EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 81 : point 74
  • EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 82 : point 47
  • TFEU, Article 101 : points 51, 57, 58, 62, 74, 89
  • TFEU, Article 102 : points 5, 8, 23, 24, 32, 35, 38 - 42, 45 - 51, 53, 57 - 59, 62, 65, 66, 71, 74, 80, 86, 89, 95, 97, 102, 106, 107
  • TFEU, Article 267 : point 30
  • TFEU, Article 288 -L3 : point 30
  • TEU, Article 4 -P3 : point 29
  • Regulation 1/2003 : points 1, 7
  • Regulation 1/2003 -A03P1 : points 8, 11
  • Regulation 1/2003 -A05 : points 9, 50 - 52
  • Regulation 1/2003 -A06 : points 51, 52
  • Regulation 1/2003 -A16P1 : point 96
  • Directive 2014/14 -A02 : point 11
  • Directive 2014/14 -A02PT1 : point 11
  • Directive 2014/14 -A10 : point 13
  • Directive 2014/104 : points 2, 4, 5, 7, 29, 32, 35, 46, 52, 54, 58, 59, 65 - 67, 69, 71, 72, 75, 87, 88, 90, 100 - 102, 106, 107
  • Directive 2014/104 -A01 : points 10, 55
  • Directive 2014/104 -A01P1 : points 56, 58
  • Directive 2014/104 -A02 : point 55
  • Directive 2014/104 -A02PT1 : points 57, 58
  • Directive 2014/104 -A02PT3 : points 57, 58
  • Directive 2014/104 -A09 : points 36, 45, 64, 96, 107
  • Directive 2014/104 -A09P1 : points 12, 30, 42, 61, 95
  • Directive 2014/104 -A10 : points 36, 45, 61, 63, 64, 73, 107
  • Directive 2014/104 -A10P2 : point 30
  • Directive 2014/104 -A10P3 : points 30, 79, 80
  • Directive 2014/104 -A10P4 : point 30
  • Directive 2014/104 -A21 : point 15
  • Directive 2014/104 -A21P1 : points 14, 15, 30
  • Directive 2014/104 -A22 : points 15, 30, 45
  • Directive 2014/104 -A22P1 : points 60, 64, 101
  • Directive 2014/104 -A22P2 : points 36, 37, 63, 64, 101
  • Directive 2014/104 -A23 : point 16
  • Directive 2014/104 -A24 : point 20
  • Directive 2014/104 -A25 : point 20
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/73 -N16 : point 66
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -41/74 -N12 : point 29
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -8/81 -N25 : point 68
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -152/84 -N48 : point 68
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -157/86 -N11 : point 99
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -91/92 -N20 : point 68
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -91/92 -N26 : point 99
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -316/93 -N16 : point 64
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -316/93 -N17 : point 64
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -316/93 -N18 : point 64
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -282/95 -N39 : point 66
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -129/96 -N45 : point 101
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -355/97 -N22 : point 34
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -287/98 : point 69
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -344/98 : point 96
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -453/99 : point 1
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -453/99 -N23 : point 66
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -397/01 -N111 : point 44
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -397/01 -N113 : point 99
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -387/02 -N109 : point 81
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -144/04 : point 29
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/04 -N110 : point 105
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/04 -N122 : point 101
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -212/04 -N123 : point 101
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 : point 1
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N39 : point 66
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N40 : point 53
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N41 : point 53
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N42 : point 53
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N60 : point 74
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N61 : point 74
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N62 : points 75, 77, 90
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N64 : points 75, 90
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N78 : point 81
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N79 : point 81
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N80 : point 81
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N81 : point 81
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N82 : point 81
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -295/04 -N89 : point 44
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -208/05 -N68 : point 99
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -268/06 -N101 : point 99
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -268/06 -N98 : point 99
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -375/09 -N32 : point 51
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -360/09 -N19 : point 74
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -375/09 : points 40, 50
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -282/10 -N33 : point 68
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -536/11 -N21 : point 74
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -536/11 -N25 : points 75, 90
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -536/11 -N26 : points 75, 90
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -536/11 -N27 : points 75, 77, 90
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 : point 1
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N20 : point 66
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N21 : point 74
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N22 : point 74
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N23 : point 74
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N24 : points 75, 90
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -557/12 -N25 : point 77
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/14 -N29 : point 44
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/14 -N32 : point 105
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -27/15 -N32 : point 101
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -187/15 -N43 : point 99
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -179/16 -N45 : point 34
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -426/16 -N31 : point 34
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -439/16 -N31 : point 101
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -439/16 -N32 : point 101
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -528/16 -N73 : point 34
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -585/16 -N98 : point 68
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -42/17 -N44 : point 63
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -42/17 -N45 : point 63
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/17 : point 69
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/17 -N34 : point 45
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/17 -N37 : point 44
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/17 -N39 : point 99
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/17 -N40 : point 105
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -122/17 -N42 : point 68
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -167/17 -N39 : point 101


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 15/11/2017

Date of the Opinion

  • 17/01/2019

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

28/03/2019


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Application: OJ C 32 from 29.01.2018, p.14

Name of the parties

Cogeco Communications

Notes on Academic Writings

Information not available



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Tribunal Judicial da Comarca de Lisboa - Portugal

Subject-matter

  • Competition
  • Approximation of laws

Procedure and result

  • Reference for a preliminary ruling
  • Reference for a preliminary ruling : case not proceeding to judgment

Formation of the Court

deuxième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Arabadjiev

Advocate General

Kokott

Language(s) of the Case

  • Portuguese

Language(s) of the Opinion

  • German