Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Directive 2008/52 : paragraphs 1, 23, 26, 30, 35
• Directive 2008/52 -A01 : paragraph 4
• Directive 2008/52 -A01P1 : paragraph 31
• Directive 2008/52 -A01P2 : paragraphs 31, 34
• Directive 2008/52 -A02 : paragraph 31
• Directive 2008/52 -A02P1 : paragraph 5
• Directive 2008/52 -A03LA : paragraphs 6, 49
• Directive 2008/52 -A05P2 : paragraphs 7, 22, 49
• Directive 2008/52 -C8 : paragraphs 3, 33
• Directive 2008/52 -C13 : paragraphs 3, 50
• Directive 2013/11 : paragraphs 1, 22, 23, 27, 29, 35, 38, 41, 43, 44, 51, 52, 69, 70
• Directive 2013/11 -A01 : paragraphs 9, 26, 39, 45, 46, 48, 62, 63, 66
• Directive 2013/11 -A02P1 : paragraphs 26, 30, 37
• Directive 2013/11 -A02P2 : paragraph 26
• Directive 2013/11 -A03 : paragraph 10
• Directive 2013/11 -A03P2 : paragraphs 26, 30
• Directive 2013/11 -A04 : paragraph 11
• Directive 2013/11 -A04LA : paragraph 21
• Directive 2013/11 -A04LD : paragraph 21
• Directive 2013/11 -A04P1LG : paragraph 40
• Directive 2013/11 -A04P1LH : paragraph 40
• Directive 2013/11 -A08 : paragraph 12
• Directive 2013/11 -A08LA : paragraph 60
• Directive 2013/11 -A08LB : paragraph 64
• Directive 2013/11 -A09 : paragraphs 13, 24
• Directive 2013/11 -A09P1LB : paragraph 64
• Directive 2013/11 -A09P2 : paragraph 25
• Directive 2013/11 -A09P2LA : paragraphs 57, 67
• Directive 2013/11 -A09P2LB : paragraph 57
• Directive 2013/11 -A09P3 : paragraph 58
• Directive 2013/11 -A12 : paragraphs 14, 59
• Directive 2013/11 -A20P2 : paragraph 40
• Directive 2013/11 -C16 : paragraph 8
• Directive 2013/11 -C19 : paragraphs 8, 33
• Directive 2013/11 -C45 : paragraphs 8, 56
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -317/08 : paragraph 55
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -317/08 -N45 : paragraph 52
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -317/08 -N62 : paragraph 53
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -317/08 -N63 : paragraph 54
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -317/08 -N67 : paragraph 61
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -32/11 -N26 : paragraph 28
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -561/13 -N29 : paragraph 47
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -75/16 : paragraphs 34, 51, 55
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -638/16 -N37 : paragraph 29

Operative part

• Interprets : Directive 2013/11
• Interprets : Directive 2013/11 -A02P1

Opinion

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47 : points 79, 80, 82, 89
  
• TFEU, Article 267 : point 52
  
• Directive 2008/52 : points 1, 28, 57, 58, 62, 72
  
• Directive 2008/52 -A01 : point 28
  
• Directive 2008/52 -A01P2 : points 4, 59, 60, 100
  
• Directive 2008/52 -A02P1 : points 28, 59
  
• Directive 2008/52 -A03LA : points 5, 61
  
• Directive 2008/52 -A05P2 : points 6, 31, 77
  
• Directive 2008/52 -C8 : point 60
  
• Directive 2008/52 -C13 : point 73
  
• Directive 2013/11 : points 1, 3, 30, 37, 42, 45, 47, 50, 51, 57, 58, 61, 62, 68, 99
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A01 : points 7, 36, 64, 65, 69, 71, 72, 74, 76, 78, 82, 87, 89, 90, 95, 97, 100
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A02 : points 8, 100
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A02P1 : points 32, 44, 59
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A02P2 : points 28, 23
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A02P2LG : points 31, 35, 38, 39
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A02P3 : points 67, 75
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A03P1 : points 9, 63, 73
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A03P2 : points 9, 28, 55, 56, 63, 100
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A04P1LG : points 10, 32, 43
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A04P1LH : points 10, 32, 43, 44, 46, 48
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A05 : point 56
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A05P1 : points 11, 39, 46, 49
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A05P2 : point 73
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A06 : point 56
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A07 : point 56
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A08 : point 56
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A08LA : point 80
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A08LB : points 12, 87 - 89, 100
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A08LC : point 36
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A09 : point 56
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A09P2 : points 90, 93
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A09P2LA : points 13, 93, 94, 97, 100
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A09P3 : point 93
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A10 : point 56
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A11 : point 56
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A12 : points 56, 80
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A13 : point 56
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A14 : point 56
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A15 : point 56
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A16 : point 56
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A17 : point 56
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A20 : point 14
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A20P1 : point 43
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A20P2 : points 46, 48, 49, 53
  
• Directive 2013/11 -A20P2L4 : point 43
  
• Directive 2013/11 -C15 : point 75
  
• Directive 2013/11 -C16 : points 35, 67
  
• Directive 2013/11 -C19 : points 56, 63
  
• Directive 2013/11 -C37 : point 44
  
• Directive 2013/11 -C45 : points 79, 82
  
• Directive 2013/11 -C49 : points 70, 71, 79
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -283/81 -N20 : point 72
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -297/88 -N35 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -297/88 -N36 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -297/88 -N37 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -297/88 -N40 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -397/01 -N113 : point 98
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -317/08 : point 86
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -317/08 -N44 : point 75
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -317/08 -N45 : point 76
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -317/08 -N62 : point 81
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -317/08 -N64 : points 76, 81
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -317/08 -N67 : points 80, 82
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/10 -N23 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/10 -N24 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/10 -N25 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/10 -N26 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/10 -N27 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/10 -N28 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/10 -N29 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -482/10 -N30 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/10 -N46 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -583/10 -N47 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -602/10 -N94 : point 75
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -602/10 -N95 : point 75
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -84/11 -N17 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -176/12 -N38 : point 98
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -176/12 -N39 : point 98
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -180/12 -N38 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -488/13 -N30 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -488/13 -N31 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -488/13 -N32 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -488/13 -N33 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -488/13 -N34 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -488/13 -N35 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -488/13 -N36 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -351/14 -N61 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -351/14 -N62 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -351/14 -N65 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -351/14 -N66 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -351/14 -N67 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -441/14 -N32 : point 98
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -237/15 -N35 : point 71
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -532/15 -N28 : point 34
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -281/15 -N30 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -281/15 -N31 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -281/15 -N32 : point 53
  
• Court of Justice - Order C -281/15 -N33 : point 53
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

• 10/02/2016

Date of the Opinion

• 16/02/2017

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

14/06/2017

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 277 from 21.08.2017, p.15

Application: OJ C 156 from 02.05.2016, p.24

Name of the parties

Menini and Rampanelli

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Singbartl, Jan ; Henke, Sebastian: EU-Rechtskonformität einer obligatorischen Mediation vor Klageerhebung für Rechtsstreitigkeiten mit Verbraucherbeteiligung (‚‚Menini und Rampanelli‘‘). RL 2013/11/EU Art. 2 Abs. 1, Art. 3 Abs. 2, Entscheidungen zum Wirtschaftsrecht 2017 p.579-580 (DE)
2. Simon, Denys: Protection juridictionnelle effective, Europe 2017 Août Comm. nº 291 p.13-14 (FR)
3. Ulrici, Bernhard: Verfahrensrecht: Voraussetzungen für den Abbruch des Mediationsverfahrens, Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht 2017 p.739-741 (DE)
4. Mancaleoni, Anna Maria: La mediazione obbligatoria nelle controversie bancarie alla luce della direttiva 2013/11/Ue sull'Adr dei consumatori., Il Foro italiano 2017 IV Col.565-570 (IT)
5. Scannicchio, Nicola: La risoluzione non giurisdizionale delle controversie di consumo. Rimedi alternativi o diritti senza rimedio ?, Il Foro italiano 2017 IV Col.570-576 (IT)
6. Ferraris, Federico: "A.D.R. e consumatori : rapporti e interferenze", La nuova giurisprudenza civile commentata 2017 12 p.1634-1640 (IT)
7. Simon, Denys: Protection juridictionnelle, Europe 2017 novembre nº 11 p.19-20 (FR)
8. Jánošíková, Martina: Povinná mediácia v spotrebitel'ských sporoch ako podmienka prípustnosti žaloby spotrebitel'a (rozsudok Súdneho dvora zo 14. júna 2017, Menini a Rampanelli, C-75/16, EU:C:2017:457), Právny obzor 2017 nº 5 p.523-526Jánošíková (SK)
9. Komnios, Komninos: Efarmoges Astikou Dikaiou 2018 p.96-104 (EL)
10. Dendorfer-Ditges, Renate: EUgH I Mediation als Zulässigkeitsvoraussetzung eines Gerichtsverfahrens und Voraussetzungen für Abbruch eines Mediationsverfahrens, IWRZ – Zeitschrift für internationales Wirtschaftsrecht 2018 p.35-36 (DE)
11. Kramme, Malte: Zulässige Zulässigkeitsvoraussetzung: Zum Verhältnis von Alternativer Streitbeilegung zu Gerichtsverfahren. Anmerkung zu EuGH v. 14.6.2017 - Rs. C-75/16 (Menini und Rampanelli), Zeitschrift für das Privatrecht der Europäischen Union - GPR 2018 n° 02 p.83-86 (DE)
12. Klaassen, C.J.M.: NJ 2018/247 - HvJ EU 14 juni 2017, C-75/16, Livio Menini en Maria Antonia Rampanelli / Banco Popolare Società Cooperativa, Nederlandse jurisprudentie ; Uitspraken in burgerlijke en strafzaken 2018 nº 25 p.3764-3766 (NL)
13. Poillot, Élise: XIX. Consommation - Cour de justice, 1ère ch., 14 juin 2017, Livio Menini et Maria Antonia Rampanelli c/ Banco Popolare Società Cooperativa, aff. C-75/16, ECLI:EU:C:2017:457, Jurisprudence de la CJUE 2017. Décisions et commentaires (Ed. Bruylant - Bruxelles) 2018, p. 840-842 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Tribunale di Verona - Italy

Subject-matter

• Approximation of laws
  
• Consumer protection
  

Provisions of national law referred to

decreto legislativo, art. 5, par. 1-bis decreto legislativo, art. 141, par. 1, 4 et 6

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  
• Reference for a preliminary ruling : case not proceeding to judgment
  

Formation of the Court

Première chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Silva de Lapuerta

Advocate General

Saugmandsgaard Øe

Language(s) of the Case

• Italian
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• French