Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47 : paragraph 48
• TFEU, Article 21 -P1 : paragraphs 19 - 21, 27, 28, 34 - 36, 41
• Directive 2004/38 : paragraphs 1, 10, 18, 19, 21, 27, 29, 35, 36, 41, 48
• Directive 2004/38 -A02 : paragraph 4
• Directive 2004/38 -A02PT2 : paragraphs 22, 34
• Directive 2004/38 -A03 : paragraph 5
• Directive 2004/38 -A03P1 : paragraphs 22, 23
• Directive 2004/38 -A03P2 : paragraphs 17, 31, 34, 37, 40, 42, 43, 50 - 52
• Directive 2004/38 -A03P2L1 : paragraphs 38, 47
• Directive 2004/38 -A03P2L1LA : paragraph 46
• Directive 2004/38 -A03P2L1LB : paragraphs 25, 26, 30, 32, 33, 45, 46, 49
• Directive 2004/38 -A03P2L2 : paragraphs 38, 47
• Directive 2004/38 -A08P5LE : paragraphs 6, 46
• Directive 2004/38 -A08P5LF : paragraphs 6, 46
• Directive 2004/38 -A10P2LE : paragraphs 7, 46
• Directive 2004/38 -A10P2LF : paragraphs 7, 46
• Directive 2004/38 -A15P1 : paragraphs 8, 44
• Directive 2004/38 -A30 : paragraph 44
• Directive 2004/38 -A31 : paragraph 9
• Directive 2004/38 -A31P1 : paragraphs 44, 49
• Directive 2004/38 -C6 : paragraph 3
• Directive 2004/38 -C25 : paragraph 3
• Directive 2004/38 -C26 : paragraph 3
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/90 : paragraphs 16 - 18
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -430/10 -N41 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/11 -N21 : paragraph 31
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/11 -N22 : paragraph 38
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/11 -N23 : paragraph 39
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/11 -N24 : paragraph 40
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/11 -N25 : paragraph 50
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -300/11 -N50 : paragraph 48
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 : paragraph 34
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N35 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N50 : paragraph 29
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N54 : paragraph 28
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N61 : paragraph 29
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -544/15 -N45 : paragraph 51
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -544/15 -N46 : paragraph 51
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/16 -N18 : paragraph 21
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/16 -N20 : paragraph 23
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/16 -N22 : paragraph 18
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/16 -N23 : paragraph 27
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/16 -N24 : paragraph 28
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -673/16 -N25 : paragraph 29
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -89/17 : paragraphs 25, 32, 34, 46

Operative part

• Interprets : TFEU, Article 21
• Interprets : Directive 2004/38 -A03P2

Opinion

• EEC Treaty (Rome), Article 52 : point 30
  
• EC Treaty (Amsterdam), Article 39 : point 30
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47 : points 75, 82, 90, 92, 93, 95, 99 - 101, 105, 113, 115, 116
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 47 -L2 : point 103
  
• Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 51 -P1 : point 95
  
• TFEU, Article 21 -P1 : points 30, 32, 61, 64, 69, 116
  
• TFEU, Article 45 : points 61, 64, 69, 116
  
• TEU, Article 4 -P3 : point 91
  
• TEU, Article 19 -P1 : point 91
  
• Directive 64/221 -A09 : point 83
  
• Regulation 1612/68 : point 30
  
• Regulation 1612/68 -A10P2 : point 38
  
• Directive 73/148 : point 30
  
• Directive 73/148 -A01P2 : point 38
  
• Directive 2003/86 : point 58
  
• Directive 2004/38 : points 6, 23, 32, 36, 39, 42, 43, 47, 61, 70, 75, 98
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A02 : points 9, 35
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A02PT2 : points 2, 33, 37, 46, 52, 72, 86
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A03 : point 10
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A03P1 : points 29, 33
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A03P2 : points 2, 4, 7, 16, 19, 20, 24, 28 - 30, 33, 37, 38, 46, 49 - 54, 56, 57, 59, 60, 62 - 64, 69, 72, 81, 82, 84 - 87, 89, 90, 93, 94, 108, 110, 111, 115, 116
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A03P2LA : point 22
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A03P2LB : points 22, 26, 27, 65
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A07P4 : point 87
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A08P5LE : point 87
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A08P5LF : point 87
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A10P2LE : point 87
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A10P2LF : point 87
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A15 : points 83, 86, 88, 90, 93, 94
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A15P1 : point 11
  
• Directive 2004/38 -A31 : points 12, 83
  
• Directive 2004/38 -C6 : points 8, 29, 38, 54, 59
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -98/79 -N11 : point 94
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -222/86 -N14 : point 91
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -370/90 -N7 : point 43
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -370/90 -N8 : points 40, 43
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/90 : points 6, 18 - 20, 23, 35, 49
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/90 -N19 : point 31
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/90 -N23 : point 31
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -370/90 -N25 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -97/91 -N14 : point 91
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -97/91 -N15 : point 91
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -65/95 -N60 : point 78
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -65/95 -N70 : point 83
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -65/95 -N24 : point 94
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -72/95 -N56 : point 110
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -120/97 -N30 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -120/97 -N34 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -120/97 -N35 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -120/97 -N36 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -224/98 -N31 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -459/99 : point 83
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -92/00 -N59 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -92/00 -N60 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -92/00 -N61 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -92/00 -N62 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -92/00 -N63 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -92/00 -N64 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -127/02 -N66 : point 110
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -148/02 -N31 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -224/02 -N19 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -136/03 : point 83
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -211/03 -N75 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -211/03 -N76 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -211/03 -N77 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -211/03 -N78 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -211/03 -N79 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -406/04 -N39 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -506/04 -N46 : point 91
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -506/04 -N47 : point 91
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -291/05 -N38 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -291/05 -N39 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -76/05 -N88 : point 44
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -291/05 : points 6, 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -291/05 -N32 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -291/05 -N36 : point 31
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -291/05 -N39 : point 60
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -291/05 -N45 : point 30
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -402/05 : point 76
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/09 -N100 : point 110
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/09 -N101 : point 110
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/09 -N102 : point 110
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/09 -N103 : point 110
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -272/09 : point 76
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -69/10 -N56 : point 104
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -69/10 -N57 : point 104
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -69/10 -N61 : point 104
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -584/10 -N102 : point 104
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -617/10 -N29 : point 95
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -83/11 -N64 : point 55
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -40/11 -N61 : point 27
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -40/11 -N70 : point 31
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/11 : points 51, 60, 108
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/11 -N18 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/11 -N19 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/11 -N21 : points 57, 58
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/11 -N22 : points 53, 59
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/11 -N23 : point 59
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/11 -N24 : points 54, 57
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -83/11 -N25 : points 52, 110
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -199/11 -N49 : point 103
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -399/11 -N60 : point 95
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -456/12 -N89 : point 45
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 : points 6, 35
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N37 : point 27
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N39 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N40 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N41 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N42 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N43 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N46 : point 31
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N47 : point 36
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/12 -N61 : points 30, 32
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -457/12 -N41 : point 89
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -440/13 -N40 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -440/13 -N41 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -440/13 -N42 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -440/13 -N43 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -440/13 -N44 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -440/13 -N45 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -71/14 -N84 : points 79, 81
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -71/14 -N52 : point 94
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -71/14 -N58 : point 102
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -300/14 -N38 : point 103
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -560/14 -N33 : point 104
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -171/15 -N65 : points 101, 102
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -544/15 -N78 : point 109
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -133/15 -N53 : point 27
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -161/15 -N29 : point 96
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -429/15 -N32 : point 97
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -544/15 -N45 : point 109
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -544/15 -N46 : point 109
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -628/15 -N47 : point 91
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -682/15 -N55 : point 103
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -73/16 -N49 : point 101
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -217/16 -N28 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -217/16 -N60 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -217/16 -N61 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -217/16 -N62 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -217/16 -N63 : point 80
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -403/16 -N103 : point 92
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -403/16 -N104 : point 92
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -403/16 -N105 : point 92
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -403/16 -N106 : point 92
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -673/16 -N94 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -673/16 -N95 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Opinion C -673/16 -N96 : point 52
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/16 -N32 : point 89
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/16 -N33 : points 27, 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/16 -N34 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/16 -N35 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/16 -N36 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/16 -N37 : point 29
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/16 -N47 : point 89
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -165/16 -N48 : point 89
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -348/16 -N41 : point 104
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -403/16 -N36 : point 92
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -403/16 -N37 : point 92
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -403/16 -N38 : point 92
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -403/16 -N39 : point 92
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -403/16 -N40 : point 92
  
• Court of Justice - Judgment C -403/16 -N41 : point 92
  

Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

Information not available

Date of the Opinion

• 10/04/2018

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

12/07/2018

References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 319 from 10.09.2018, p.9

Application: OJ C 129 from 24.04.2017, p.7

Name of the parties

Banger

Notes on Academic Writings

1. Rigaux, Anne: Droit de séjour dérivé des ressortissants d'États tiers, Europe 2018 Octobre Comm. nº 10 p.20-22 (FR)
2. Patyna, Agata: SSHD v Banger, Journal of Immigration Asylum and Nationality Law 2018 Volume 32 p.403-405 (EN)
3. Carlier, Jean-Yves ; Renaudière, Géraldine: Libre circulation des personnes dans l'Union européenne, Journal de droit européen 2019 p.166-175 (FR)

Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) - United Kingdom

Subject-matter

• Non-discrimination and citizenship of the Union
  
• - Citizenship of the Union
  
• Freedom of movement for persons
  
• - Freedom of establishment
  
• Freedom of movement for persons
  
• - Freedom of movement for workers
  
• Freedom to provide services
  
• Principles of Union law
  

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

• Reference for a preliminary ruling
  

Formation of the Court

Quatrième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Jürimäe

Advocate General

Bobek

Language(s) of the Case

• English
  

Language(s) of the Opinion

• English