Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 26 April 2018

Cellnex Telecom SA and Telecom Castilla-La Mancha, SA v European Commission

Joined Cases C-91/17 P and C-92/17 P



Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment (OJ)
01/06/2018 Cellnex Telecom v Commission
Judgment
ECLI:EU:C:2018:284
26/04/2018 Cellnex Telecom v Commission
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Application (OJ)
07/04/2017 Cellnex Telecom v Commission
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

Not yet published (General Report - Section 'Information on unpublished decisions')

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Information not available


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

  • TFEU, Article 14 : paragraphs 32, 36
  • TFEU, Article 106 : paragraph 27
  • TFEU, Article 106 -P2 : paragraphs 23, 32, 36
  • TFEU, Article 107 : paragraphs 27, 32, 99, 106
  • TFEU, Article 107 -P1 : paragraphs 21, 32, 36, 100, 111, 117, 121
  • TFEU, Article 107 -P3LC : paragraphs 22, 27
  • TFEU, Article 108 -P2 : paragraph 16
  • TFEU, Article 256 : paragraph 67
  • TFEU, Article 256 -P1L2 : paragraph 107
  • TFEU, Article 296 : paragraph 27
  • TFEU - Protocol No 3 -A58L1 : paragraph 107
  • Regulation 659/1999 : paragraph 27
  • Decision 2005/842 -A04 : paragraph 61
  • Court of Justice - Rules of Procedure (2012) -A168P1LD : paragraph 107
  • Regulation 734/2013 : paragraph 27
  • Decision 2014/489 : paragraph 17
  • Secondary Legislation - Internal Act of the Institutions - 32015Q0423(01) -A85 : paragraph 77
  • Secondary Legislation - Internal Act of the Institutions - 32015Q0423(01) -A85P3 : paragraph 63
  • Decision 2016/1385 : paragraph 1
  • Decision 2016/1385 -A01L1 : paragraph 25
  • Decision 2016/1385 -A03P1 : paragraphs 19, 25
  • Commission - Other Acts - 52010XC1214(04) : paragraph 16
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -70/72 : paragraph 103
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -56/93 -N10 : paragraph 120
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -251/97 : paragraph 102
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -280/00 : paragraphs 35, 70, 117, 119
  • General Court - Judgment T -98/00 -N52 : paragraph 102
  • General Court - Judgment T -98/00 -N53 : paragraph 102
  • General Court - Judgment T -98/00 -N54 : paragraph 102
  • Court of Justice - Opinion C -126/01 : paragraph 102
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -646/11 -N63 : paragraph 95
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -646/11 -N64 : paragraph 95
  • Court of Justice - Order C -99/14 -N18 : paragraph 107
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -270/15 -N35 : paragraph 112
  • General Court - Judgment T -37/15 : paragraphs 1 - 123
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -66/16 -N110 : paragraph 76
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -66/16 -N69 : paragraph 41
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -66/16 -N70 : paragraph 42
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -66/16 -N72 : paragraph 44
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -66/16 -N73 : paragraph 44
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -66/16 -N75 : paragraph 46
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -66/16 -N97 : paragraph 67
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -66/16 -N98 : paragraph 68
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -66/16 -N99 : paragraph 69
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -74/16 -N66 : paragraph 111

Operative part

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 20/02/2017

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

26/04/2018


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 211 from 18.06.2018, p.6

Application: OJ C 129 from 24.04.2017, p.8

Name of the parties

Cellnex Telecom v Commission

Notes on Academic Writings

Information not available



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • Competition
  • - State aid

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment
  • Appeals : dismissal on substantive grounds
  • Appeals : dismissal on grounds of inadmissibility

Formation of the Court

neuvième chambre (Cour)

Judge-Rapporteur

Jürimäe

Advocate General

Sharpston

Language(s) of the Case

  • Spanish

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available