Judgment of the General Court (Seventh Chamber) of 20 March 2019

Prim, SA v European Union Intellectual Property Office

EU trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — EU word mark PRIMED — Earlier national figurative marks PRIM S.A., PRiM, S.A. SUMINISTROS MEDICOS and GRUPO PRiM — Genuine use of the earlier marks — Article 57(2) and (3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 64(2) and (3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001) — Right to be heard — Second sentence of Article 75 of Regulation No 207/2009 (now second sentence of Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001) — Submission of evidence for the first time before the Board of Appeal — Discretion of the Board of Appeal — Classification as new or additional evidence — Article 76(2) of Regulation No 207/2009 (now Article 95(2) of Regulation 2017/1001)

Case T-138/17


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment (OJ)
12/04/2019 Prim v EUIPO - Primed Halberstadt Medizintechnik (PRIMED)
Judgment
ECLI:EU:T:2019:174
20/03/2019 Prim v EUIPO - Primed Halberstadt Medizintechnik (PRIMED)
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment (Information)
ECLI:EU:T:2019:174
20/03/2019 Prim v EUIPO - Primed Halberstadt Medizintechnik (PRIMED)
Application (OJ)
07/04/2017 Prim v EUIPO - Primed Halberstadt Medizintechnik (PRIMED)
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general - 'Information on unpublished decisions' section)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.03 European Union trade mark
      4.11.03.04 Procedure and legal proceedings
        4.11.03.04.04 Procedure
          4.11.03.04.04.06 Rights of the defence
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.03 European Union trade mark
      4.11.03.04 Procedure and legal proceedings
        4.11.03.04.03 Appeals
          4.11.03.04.03.01 Appeals before the Boards of Appeal
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.03 European Union trade mark
      4.11.03.04 Procedure and legal proceedings
        4.11.03.04.03 Appeals
          4.11.03.04.03.02 Actions before the Courts of the European Union
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.03 European Union trade mark
      4.11.03.04 Procedure and legal proceedings
        4.11.03.04.03 Appeals
          4.11.03.04.03.02 Actions before the Courts of the European Union
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.03 European Union trade mark
      4.11.03.04 Procedure and legal proceedings
        4.11.03.04.03 Appeals
          4.11.03.04.03.02 Actions before the Courts of the European Union


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

  • Charter of Fundamental Rights of the EU (2007), Article 41 -P2LA : paragraph 25
  • Regulation 40/94 : paragraph 1
  • Regulation 2868/95 -A01R40P6 : paragraphs 30, 33, 49, 51, 52
  • Regulation 207/2009 -A08P1LB : paragraphs 6, 64
  • Regulation 207/2009 -A42P2 : paragraph 16
  • Regulation 207/2009 -A42P3 : paragraph 16
  • Regulation 207/2009 -A53P1LA : paragraphs 6, 49
  • Regulation 207/2009 -A57P1 : paragraph 51
  • Regulation 207/2009 -A57P2 : paragraphs 8, 16, 29, 32, 33, 35, 38, 56, 57
  • Regulation 207/2009 -A57P3 : paragraphs 8, 16, 29, 32, 33, 35
  • Regulation 207/2009 -A63P2 : paragraph 53
  • Regulation 207/2009 -A65P2 : paragraph 67
  • Regulation 207/2009 -A65P3 : paragraphs 62, 67
  • Regulation 207/2009 -A65P6 : paragraph 68
  • Regulation 207/2009 -A75 : paragraphs 16, 24, 25, 31, 42, 44, 45, 61
  • Regulation 207/2009 -A75P2 : paragraphs 49, 51
  • Regulation 207/2009 -A75P3 : paragraphs 49, 51
  • Regulation 207/2009 -A76P2 : paragraphs 46, 47, 52
  • Regulation 207/2009 -A78 : paragraph 53
  • Regulation 207/2009 -C10 : paragraph 29
  • Regulation 1430/2017 -A10P3 : paragraph 58
  • Regulation 1430/2017 -A10P7 : paragraph 58
  • Regulation 1430/2017 -A19P1 : paragraph 58
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -29/05 -N49 : paragraph 48
  • General Court - Judgment T -542/10 -N72 : paragraph 27
  • General Court - Judgment T -378/13 -N56 : paragraph 63
  • General Court - Judgment T -129/15 -N14 : paragraph 67
  • General Court - Judgment T -240/15 -N61 : paragraph 26
  • General Court - Judgment T -399/15 -N16 : paragraph 68
  • General Court - Judgment T -473/15 -N59 : paragraph 42
  • General Court - Judgment T -473/15 -N72 : paragraph 44
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -418/16 -N48 : paragraph 46
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -418/16 -N49 : paragraph 47
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -418/16 -N53 : paragraph 50
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -418/16 -N54 : paragraph 51
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -418/16 -N55 : paragraph 52
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -634/16 -N38 : paragraph 53
  • General Court - Judgment T -29/17 -N76 : paragraph 28

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 28/02/2017

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

20/03/2019


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 155 from 06.05.2019, p.39

Application: OJ C 129 from 24.04.2017, p.29

Name of the parties

Prim v EUIPO - Primed Halberstadt Medizintechnik (PRIMED)

Notes on Academic Writings

Information not available



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  • - Trade marks

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment : application granted
  • Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds

Formation of the Court

septième chambre (Tribunal)

Judge-Rapporteur

Marcoulli

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

  • English

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available