Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 6 June 2019

Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG v European Union Intellectual Property Office

Case T-209/18



Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment (OJ)
12/07/2019 Porsche v EUIPO - Autec (Véhicules motorisés)
Judgment
ECLI:EU:T:2019:377
06/06/2019 Porsche v EUIPO - Autec (Véhicules motorisés)
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Application (OJ)
27/04/2018 Porsche v EUIPO - Autec (Véhicules motorisés)
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.04 Community designs
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.04 Community designs
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.04 Community designs
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.04 Community designs
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.04 Community designs
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.04 Community designs
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.04 Community designs
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.04 Community designs


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

  • Regulation 6/2002 : paragraphs 1, 62
  • Regulation 6/2002 -A04 : paragraph 20
  • Regulation 6/2002 -A04P1 : paragraphs 5, 21, 99
  • Regulation 6/2002 -A05 : paragraphs 5, 18, 20, 80, 82, 98
  • Regulation 6/2002 -A05P2 : paragraph 81
  • Regulation 6/2002 -A06 : paragraphs 5, 18, 20, 37, 56, 80, 82, 96
  • Regulation 6/2002 -A06P1 : paragraph 11
  • Regulation 6/2002 -A06P1LB : paragraph 22
  • Regulation 6/2002 -A06P2 : paragraph 23
  • Regulation 6/2002 -A07 : paragraph 20
  • Regulation 6/2002 -A08 : paragraph 20
  • Regulation 6/2002 -A09 : paragraph 20
  • Regulation 6/2002 -A25P1LB : paragraphs 5, 18, 20
  • General Court - Judgment T -9/07 -N56 : paragraph 34
  • General Court - Judgment T -153/08 -N24 : paragraph 72
  • General Court - Judgment T -153/08 -N25 : paragraph 75
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -281/10 -N53 : paragraph 27
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -281/10 -N59 : paragraph 26
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -281/10 -N73 : paragraph 76
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -281/10 -N74 : paragraph 76
  • General Court - Judgment T -231/10 -N28 : paragraph 22
  • General Court - Judgment T -68/11 : paragraph 82
  • General Court - Judgment T -68/11 -N37 : paragraph 81
  • General Court - Judgment T -83/11 -N95 : paragraph 59
  • General Court - Judgment T -666/11 -N29 : paragraph 24
  • General Court - Judgment T -666/11 -N30 : paragraph 73
  • General Court - Judgment T -666/11 -N32 : paragraph 37
  • General Court - Judgment T -525/13 -N28 : paragraph 44
  • General Court - Judgment T -526/13 -N33 : paragraph 48
  • General Court - Judgment T -526/13 -N35 : paragraph 48
  • General Court - Judgment T -251/14 -N51 : paragraph 44
  • General Court - Judgment T -251/14 -N52 : paragraph 46
  • General Court - Judgment T -334/14 -N58 : paragraph 71
  • General Court - Judgment T -57/16 -N32 : paragraph 49
  • General Court - Judgment T -57/16 -N41 : paragraph 33
  • General Court - Judgment T -90/16 -N72 : paragraph 62
  • General Court - Judgment T -424/16 -N48 : paragraph 82
  • General Court - Judgment T -684/16 -N29 : paragraph 59
  • General Court - Judgment T -684/16 -N30 : paragraph 59
  • General Court - Judgment T -779/16 -N19 : paragraph 26

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 22/03/2018

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

06/06/2019


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 255 from 29.07.2019, p.37

Application: OJ C 166 from 14.05.2018, p.46

Name of the parties

Porsche v EUIPO - Autec (Véhicules motorisés)

Notes on Academic Writings

Information not available



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  • - Designs

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds

Formation of the Court

troisième chambre (Tribunal)

Judge-Rapporteur

Perillo

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

  • German

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available