Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 21 June 2018

Haverkamp IP GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office

Community design — Invalidity proceedings — International registration designating the European Union — Registered Community design representing a pebble beach surface pattern — Earlier design — Grounds for invalidity — Lack of novelty — Article 5 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002

Case T-228/16


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment (OJ)
20/07/2018 Haverkamp IP v EUIPO - Sissel (Motif de surface plage de galets)
Judgment
ECLI:EU:T:2018:369
21/06/2018 Haverkamp IP v EUIPO - Sissel (Motif de surface plage de galets)
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment (Information)
ECLI:EU:T:2018:369
21/06/2018 Haverkamp IP v EUIPO - Sissel (Motif de surface plage de galets)
Order
ECLI:EU:T:2017:922
14/12/2017 Haverkamp IP v EUIPO - Sissel (Motif de surface plage de galets)
Application (OJ)
17/06/2016 Haverkamp IP v EUIPO - Sissel (Motif de surface plage de galets)
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general - 'Information on unpublished decisions' section)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.04 Community designs
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.04 Community designs
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.04 Community designs


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

  • Regulation 6/2002 : paragraph 26
  • Regulation 6/2002 -A04 : paragraphs 21, 50
  • Regulation 6/2002 -A04P1 : paragraph 21
  • Regulation 6/2002 -A05 : paragraphs 9, 13, 21, 23, 48
  • Regulation 6/2002 -A05P1 : paragraph 42
  • Regulation 6/2002 -A05P1LB : paragraphs 7, 22
  • Regulation 6/2002 -A05P2 : paragraphs 22, 46
  • Regulation 6/2002 -A06 : paragraphs 9, 13, 21, 51
  • Regulation 6/2002 -A07 : paragraph 21
  • Regulation 6/2002 -A07P1 : paragraphs 23, 24
  • Regulation 6/2002 -A08 : paragraph 21
  • Regulation 6/2002 -A09 : paragraph 21
  • Regulation 6/2002 -A25P1LB : paragraphs 5, 21
  • Regulation 6/2002 -A65P1 : paragraph 26
  • Regulation 6/2002 -A106BIS : paragraphs 18, 19
  • Regulation 6/2002 -A106SEPTIES : paragraphs 5, 18, 20
  • Regulation 2245/2002 : paragraphs 25, 26
  • Regulation 2245/2002 -A28P1LBPT5 : paragraphs 25, 26
  • Regulation 2245/2002 -A28P1LBPT6 : paragraph 26
  • Regulation 1891/2006 : paragraph 18
  • General Court - Judgment T -450/08 -N21 : paragraph 26
  • General Court - Judgment T -450/08 -N22 : paragraph 26
  • General Court - Judgment T -450/08 -N23 : paragraph 26
  • General Court - Judgment T -68/11 -N37 : paragraph 22
  • General Court - Judgment T -666/11 -N24 : paragraph 26
  • General Court - Judgment T -666/11 -N30 : paragraph 38
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -361/15 -N62 : paragraph 31
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -361/15 -N96 : paragraph 42
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -361/15 -N99 : paragraph 24
  • General Court - Judgment T -420/15 -N29 : paragraph 27

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 10/05/2016

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

21/06/2018


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 276 from 06.08.2018, p.39

Application: OJ C 243 from 04.07.2016, p.43

Name of the parties

Haverkamp IP v EUIPO - Sissel (Motif de surface plage de galets)

Notes on Academic Writings

Information not available



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  • - Trade marks

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds

Formation of the Court

neuvième chambre (Tribunal)

Judge-Rapporteur

Kowalik-Bańczyk

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

  • German

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available