Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 23 September 2020

BASF AS v European Commission

Medicinal products for human use – Marketing authorisation for medicinal products for human use containing omega-3 acid ethyl esters – Variation of the terms of the authorisation – First paragraph of Article 116 of Directive 2001/83/EC – Manifest error of assessment – Proportionality

Case T-472/19


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment (OJ)
30/10/2020 BASF v Commission
Judgment
ECLI:EU:T:2020:432
23/09/2020 BASF v Commission
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment (Information)
ECLI:EU:T:2020:432
23/09/2020 BASF v Commission
Order (OJ)
25/10/2019 BASF v Commission
Application (OJ)
23/08/2019 BASF v Commission
Order
ECLI:EU:T:2019:555
19/08/2019 BASF v Commission
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Order (Information)
ECLI:EU:T:2019:555
19/08/2019 BASF v Commission
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

Not yet published (General Report - Section 'Information on unpublished decisions')

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Information not available


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

  • TFEU, Article 278 : paragraph 16
  • TFEU, Article 279 : paragraph 16
  • Directive 2001/83 : paragraph 1
  • Directive 2001/83 -A06P1L1 : paragraph 2
  • Directive 2001/83 -A31 : paragraph 14
  • Directive 2001/83 -A31P1 : paragraphs 3, 9, 10, 25, 26
  • Directive 2001/83 -A32P1 : paragraph 4
  • Directive 2001/83 -A32P2 : paragraph 4
  • Directive 2001/83 -A32P4 : paragraph 11
  • Directive 2001/83 -A32P5 : paragraph 4
  • Directive 2001/83 -A33 : paragraph 5
  • Directive 2001/83 -A34 : paragraph 6
  • Directive 2001/83 -A116L1 : paragraphs 7, 37, 45, 48, 49, 85, 101, 112
  • Secondary Legislation - Internal Act of the Institutions - 32015Q0423(01) -A76LD : paragraph 37
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -331/88 -N13 : paragraph 108
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -180/96 -N96 : paragraph 108
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -120/97 -N34 : paragraph 109
  • General Court - Judgment T -326/99 -N55 : paragraph 62
  • General Court - Judgment T -74/00 -N174 : paragraph 51
  • General Court - Judgment T -74/00 -N177 : paragraph 51
  • General Court - Judgment T -74/00 -N191 : paragraph 51
  • General Court - Judgment T -74/00 -N192 : paragraph 51
  • General Court - Judgment T -74/00 -N193 : paragraph 51
  • General Court - Judgment T -74/00 -N194 : paragraph 51
  • General Court - Judgment T -74/00 -N200 : paragraph 52
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -221/10 -N96 : paragraph 49
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -221/10 -N99 : paragraph 46
  • General Court - Judgment T -539/10 -N66 : paragraph 50
  • General Court - Judgment T -539/10 -N79 : paragraph 49
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -269/13 -N59 : paragraph 48
  • General Court - Judgment T -189/13 -N34 : paragraph 109
  • General Court - Judgment T -189/13 -N41 : paragraph 46
  • General Court - Judgment T -189/13 -N44 : paragraph 51
  • General Court - Judgment T -189/13 -N52 : paragraphs 52, 53
  • General Court - Judgment T -189/13 -N75 : paragraph 51
  • General Court - Judgment T -189/13 -N111 : paragraph 108
  • General Court - Judgment T -452/14 -N60 : paragraph 62
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -82/15 -N21 : paragraph 47
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -82/15 -N23 : paragraphs 48, 50
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -680/16 -N48 : paragraph 29
  • General Court - Judgment T -783/17 -N44 : paragraph 46
  • General Court - Judgment T -783/17 -N45 : paragraph 47
  • General Court - Judgment T -783/17 -N46 : paragraph 48
  • General Court - Judgment T -783/17 -N47 : paragraph 49
  • General Court - Judgment T -783/17 -N48 : paragraph 50
  • General Court - Judgment T -783/17 -N49 : paragraph 51
  • General Court - Judgment T -783/17 -N50 : paragraph 52
  • General Court - Judgment T -783/17 -N51 : paragraph 53
  • Court of Justice - Order C -773/19 : paragraph 17
  • General Court - Order T -472/19 : paragraph 17

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 09/07/2019

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

23/09/2020


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Information not available

Name of the parties

BASF v Commission

Notes on Academic Writings

Information not available



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • Public health

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds

Formation of the Court

huitième chambre (Tribunal)

Judge-Rapporteur

Barents

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

  • English

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available