Judgment of the General Court (Third Chamber) of 12 September 2018

Przedsiębiorstwo Produkcyjno-Handlowe „Primart” Marek Łukasiewicz v European Union Intellectual Property Office

EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark PRIMART Marek Łukasiewicz — Earlier national work marks PRIMA — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

Case T-584/17



Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment (OJ)
05/10/2018 Primart v EUIPO - Bolton Cile España (PRIMART Marek Łukasiewicz)
Judgment
ECLI:EU:T:2018:530
12/09/2018 Primart v EUIPO - Bolton Cile España (PRIMART Marek Łukasiewicz)
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment (Information)
ECLI:EU:T:2018:530
12/09/2018 Primart v EUIPO - Bolton Cile España (PRIMART Marek Łukasiewicz)
Application (OJ)
20/10/2017 Primart v EUIPO - Bolton Cile España (PRIMART Marek Łukasiewicz)
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general - 'Information on unpublished decisions' section)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Information not available


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

  • Regulation 207/2009 : paragraphs 1, 106
  • Regulation 207/2009 -A08P1LB : paragraphs 7, 24, 25, 27, 108
  • Regulation 207/2009 -A41 : paragraph 5
  • Regulation 207/2009 -A65 : paragraph 89
  • Regulation 207/2009 -A76P1 : paragraph 88
  • General Court - Judgment T -162/01 -N30 : paragraph 26
  • General Court - Judgment T -162/01 -N31 : paragraph 26
  • General Court - Judgment T -162/01 -N32 : paragraph 26
  • General Court - Judgment T -162/01 -N33 : paragraph 26
  • General Court - Judgment T -183/02 -N81 : paragraph 71
  • General Court - Judgment T -183/02 -N83 : paragraph 71
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -120/04 : paragraph 94
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -29/05 -N54 : paragraph 88
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -334/05 -N35 : paragraph 41
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -334/05 -N41 : paragraph 42
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -334/05 -N42 : paragraph 42
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -193/06 -N42 : paragraph 42
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -193/06 -N43 : paragraph 42
  • General Court - Judgment T -316/07 -N42 : paragraph 27
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -57/08 -N45 : paragraph 80
  • General Court - Judgment T -534/10 -N28 : paragraph 88
  • General Court - Judgment T -534/10 -N29 : paragraph 89
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -591/12 -N24 : paragraph 98
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -591/12 -N34 : paragraph 101
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -591/12 -N36 : paragraph 102
  • General Court - Judgment T -96/14 -N68 : paragraph 109
  • Court of Justice - Order C -480/15 -N36 : paragraph 106
  • Court of Justice - Order C -480/15 -N37 : paragraph 107
  • General Court - Judgment T -407/15 -N29 : paragraph 37
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -182/16 -N58 : paragraph 101
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -182/16 -N59 : paragraph 102
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -182/16 -N60 : paragraph 103
  • General Court - Judgment T -243/16 -N26 : paragraph 37
  • General Court - Judgment T -243/16 -N28 : paragraph 37
  • General Court - Judgment T -103/17 -N57 : paragraph 71

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 24/08/2017

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

12/09/2018


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 381 from 22.10.2018, p.23

Application: OJ C 374 from 06.11.2017, p.42

Name of the parties

Primart v EUIPO - Bolton Cile España (PRIMART Marek Łukasiewicz)

Notes on Academic Writings

Information not available



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  • - Trade marks

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds

Formation of the Court

troisième chambre (Tribunal)

Judge-Rapporteur

Frimodt Nielsen

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

  • English

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available