Order of the President of the General Court of 30 April 2010.

Xeda International SA v European Commission.

Application for interim measures - Directive 91/414/EEC - Decision concerning the non-inclusion of diphenylamine in Annex I to Directive 91/414 - Application for suspension of operation of a measure - Lack of urgency.

Case T-71/10 R.


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment (OJ)
17/02/2012 Xeda International and Pace International v Commission
Judgment
ECLI:EU:T:2012:18
19/01/2012 Xeda International and Pace International v Commission
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment (Information)
ECLI:EU:T:2012:18
19/01/2012 Xeda International and Pace International v Commission
Order (OJ)
21/05/2011 Xeda International and Pace International v Commission
View pdf documents
Order
ECLI:EU:T:2011:147
08/04/2011 Xeda International and Pace International v Commission
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Order (Information)
ECLI:EU:T:2011:147
08/04/2011 Xeda International and Pace International v Commission
Order (OJ)
18/06/2010 Xeda International and Pace International v Commission
Order (Information)
ECLI:EU:T:2010:173
30/04/2010 Xeda International and Pace International v Commission
Order
ECLI:EU:T:2010:173
30/04/2010 Xeda International and Pace International v Commission
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Application (OJ)
17/04/2010 Xeda International and Pace International v Commission
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

2010 II-00077*

Pub somm

Subject-matter

Annulment of Commission Decision 2009/859/EC of 30 November 2009 concerning the non-inclusion of diphenylamine in Annex I to Council Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing that substance (notified under document C(2009) 9262) (OJ 2009 L 314, p. 79)

Systematic classification scheme

1.
3 Legal proceedings
  3.07 Interim relief
    3.07.02 Conditions for granting
3 Legal proceedings
  3.07 Interim relief
    3.07.02 Conditions for granting
3 Legal proceedings
  3.07 Interim relief
    3.07.02 Conditions for granting


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

  • TFEU, Article 278 : paragraphs 19, 22
  • TFEU, Article 279 : paragraph 19
  • Directive 91/414 : paragraph 1
  • General Court - Rules of Procedure (1991) : paragraph 20
  • Regulation 451/2000 : paragraph 1
  • Regulation 1490/2002 : paragraph 1
  • Court of Justice - Order C -149/95 : paragraph 21
  • Court of Justice - Order C -268/96 : paragraph 20
  • Court of Justice - Order C -445/00 : paragraph 21
  • Court of Justice - Order C -474/00 : paragraphs 55, 56, 58
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -154/04 : paragraph 58
  • Court of Justice - Order C -459/06 : paragraph 21
  • General Court - Order T -95/09 : paragraphs 39, 42, 45 - 48, 60, 61
  • General Court - Order T -396/09 : paragraph 22

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 22/02/2010

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

30/04/2010


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Order: OJ C 179 from 03.07.2010, p.40

Name of the parties

Xeda International and Pace International v Commission

Notes on Academic Writings

  1. Vogelezang-Stoute, E.M.: Milieu en recht 2011 p.168-170



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • Agriculture and Fisheries
  • - Plant health legislation

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment
  • Application to suspend adoption or stay execution or application for interim measures

Formation of the Court

président du Tribunal (Tribunal)

Judge-Rapporteur

Papasavvas

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

  • English

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available