Judgment of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) of 17 May 2018

Basil BV v European Union Intellectual Property Office

Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing bicycle baskets — Ground for invalidity — Inadmissibility of the application for a declaration of invalidity — Article 52(3) and Article 86(5) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — Disclosure of the earlier design — Individual character — Different overall impression — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation No 6/2002

Case T-760/16


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex Autres Liens
Judgment (OJ)
22/06/2018 Basil v EUIPO - Artex (Paniers spéciaux pour cycles)
Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
- Designs
  • Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  • - Designs
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment
ECLI:EU:T:2018:277		 17/05/2018 Basil v EUIPO - Artex (Paniers spéciaux pour cycles)
Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
- Designs
  • Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  • - Designs
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment (Summary)
ECLI:EU:T:2018:277		 17/05/2018 Basil v EUIPO - Artex (Paniers spéciaux pour cycles)
Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
- Designs
  • Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  • - Designs
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Application (OJ)
09/12/2016 Basil v EUIPO - Artex (Paniers spéciaux pour cycles)
Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
- Designs
  • Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  • - Designs
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

1.
-
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.04 Community designs
      4.11.04.03 null
        4.11.04.03.02
-
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.04 Community designs
      4.11.04.04 null
        4.11.04.04.03 null
          4.11.04.04.03.01
-
1 The legal order of the European Union
  1.04 Fundamental rights
    1.04.03 The fundamental rights
      1.04.03.47 Right to an effective remedy and to a fair trial
-
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.04 Community designs
      4.11.04.03 null
        4.11.04.03.04 null
          4.11.04.03.04.06
-
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.04 Community designs
      4.11.04.01 null
        4.11.04.01.04
-
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.04 Community designs
      4.11.04.00
-
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.04 Community designs
      4.11.04.02 null
        4.11.04.02.01
-
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.04 Community designs
      4.11.04.01 null
        4.11.04.01.04
-
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.04 Community designs
      4.11.04.01 null
        4.11.04.01.03 null
          4.11.04.01.03.05
-
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.04 Community designs
      4.11.04.01 null
        4.11.04.01.03 null
          4.11.04.01.03.02
-
4 Internal policy of the European Union
  4.11 Approximation of laws
    4.11.04 Community designs
      4.11.04.01 null
        4.11.04.01.11 null
          4.11.04.01.11.02


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 04/11/2016

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

17/05/2018


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 240 from 09.07.2018, p.36

Application: OJ C 6 from 09.01.2017, p.46

Name of the parties

Basil v EUIPO - Artex (Paniers spéciaux pour cycles)

Notes on Academic Writings

Information not available



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  • - Designs

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds

Formation of the Court

neuvième chambre (Tribunal)

Judge-Rapporteur

Gervasoni

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

  • German

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available