Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 29 November 2018

Septona AVEE v European Union Intellectual Property Office

EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU figurative mark welly — Earlier EU figurative marks Kelly’s and Kelly’s www.kellys.eu CHIPS — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

Case T-763/17


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment (OJ)
18/01/2019 Septona v EUIPO - Intersnack Group (welly)
Judgment
ECLI:EU:T:2018:861
29/11/2018 Septona v EUIPO - Intersnack Group (welly)
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Judgment (Information)
ECLI:EU:T:2018:861
29/11/2018 Septona v EUIPO - Intersnack Group (welly)
Application (OJ)
05/01/2018 Septona v EUIPO - Intersnack Group (welly)
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

published in the electronic Reports of Cases (Court Reports - general - 'Information on unpublished decisions' section)

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Information not available


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

  • Regulation 207/2009 : paragraph 1
  • Regulation 207/2009 -A08P1LB : paragraphs 9, 10, 12, 19, 21, 23
  • Regulation 207/2009 -A41 : paragraph 5
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -39/97 -N17 : paragraph 77
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -342/97 -N26 : paragraph 82
  • General Court - Judgment T -162/01 -N30 : paragraph 22
  • General Court - Judgment T -162/01 -N31 : paragraph 22
  • General Court - Judgment T -162/01 -N32 : paragraph 22
  • General Court - Judgment T -162/01 -N33 : paragraph 22
  • General Court - Judgment T -81/03 -N74 : paragraph 77
  • General Court - Judgment T -256/04 -N42 : paragraph 28
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -334/05 -N35 : paragraph 42
  • General Court - Judgment T -443/05 -N37 : paragraph 34
  • General Court - Judgment T -316/07 -N42 : paragraph 23
  • General Court - Judgment T -41/09 -N29 : paragraph 31
  • General Court - Judgment T -41/09 -N30 : paragraph 31
  • General Court - Judgment T -213/09 -N81 : paragraph 59
  • General Court - Judgment T -331/09 -N26 : paragraph 31
  • General Court - Judgment T -501/12 -N62 : paragraph 74
  • General Court - Judgment T -501/12 -N63 : paragraph 74
  • General Court - Judgment T -502/12 : paragraphs 73, 74
  • General Court - Judgment T -75/13 -N49 : paragraph 31
  • General Court - Judgment T -75/13 -N50 : paragraph 31
  • General Court - Judgment T -76/13 -N53 : paragraph 45
  • General Court - Judgment T -173/13 -N16 : paragraph 31
  • General Court - Judgment T -173/13 -N17 : paragraph 31
  • General Court - Judgment T -173/13 -N18 : paragraph 31
  • General Court - Judgment T -173/13 -N19 : paragraph 31
  • General Court - Judgment T -173/13 -N20 : paragraph 31
  • General Court - Judgment T -173/13 -N21 : paragraph 31
  • General Court - Judgment T -173/13 -N22 : paragraph 31
  • General Court - Judgment T -173/13 -N23 : paragraph 31
  • General Court - Judgment T -173/13 -N24 : paragraph 31
  • General Court - Judgment T -173/13 -N25 : paragraph 31
  • General Court - Judgment T -173/13 -N26 : paragraph 31
  • General Court - Judgment T -806/14 -N38 : paragraph 31
  • General Court - Judgment T -806/14 -N39 : paragraph 31
  • General Court - Judgment T -632/15 -N56 : paragraph 74
  • General Court - Judgment T -187/16 -N25 : paragraph 49
  • General Court - Judgment T -187/16 -N28 : paragraph 60
  • General Court - Judgment T -187/16 -N32 : paragraph 83

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 21/11/2017

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

29/11/2018


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 44 from 04.02.2019, p.43

Application: OJ C 22 from 22.01.2018, p.56

Name of the parties

Septona v EUIPO - Intersnack Group (welly)

Notes on Academic Writings

Information not available



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  • - Trade marks

Provisions of national law referred to

Information not available

Provisions of international law referred to

Information not available

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment : application granted

Formation of the Court

huitième chambre (Tribunal)

Judge-Rapporteur

Passer

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

  • English

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available