Judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) of 28 March 2019

Coesia SpA v European Union Intellectual Property Office

Case T-829/17


Top of the page Documents in the Case
Document Date Name of the parties Subject-matter Curia EUR-Lex
Judgment (OJ)
26/04/2019 Coesia v EUIPO (Représentation de deux courbes rouges obliques)
Judgment
ECLI:EU:T:2019:199
28/03/2019 Coesia v EUIPO (Représentation de deux courbes rouges obliques)
EUR-Lex text EUR-Lex bilingual text
Application (OJ)
02/02/2018 Coesia v EUIPO (Représentation de deux courbes rouges obliques)
View pdf documents
Top of the page Legal analysis of the decision or of the case

Reports of Cases

Not yet published (General Report - Section 'Information on unpublished decisions')

Subject-matter

Information not available

Systematic classification scheme

Information not available


Citations of case-law or legislation

References in grounds of judgment

  • TFEU, Article 296 : paragraph 16
  • Regulation 207/2009 : paragraphs 1, 81
  • Regulation 207/2009 -A07P1LB : paragraphs 4, 6, 8, 10, 13, 26 - 28, 42, 46, 59, 64, 72, 73, 82
  • Regulation 207/2009 -A65 : paragraph 24
  • Regulation 207/2009 -A75 : paragraphs 13, 16
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -456/01 -N35 : paragraph 29
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -447/02 -N64 : paragraph 16
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -447/02 -N65 : paragraph 16
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -173/04 -N49 : paragraph 86
  • General Court - Judgment T -346/04 -N19 : paragraph 24
  • General Court - Judgment T -139/08 -N14 : paragraph 28
  • General Court - Judgment T -139/08 -N26 : paragraph 43
  • General Court - Judgment T -139/08 -N27 : paragraph 42
  • General Court - Judgment T -139/08 -N34 : paragraph 80
  • General Court - Judgment T -139/08 -N39 : paragraph 64
  • General Court - Judgment T -547/08 -N43 : paragraph 17
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -51/10 -N74 : paragraph 68
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -51/10 -N75 : paragraph 69
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -51/10 -N76 : paragraph 69
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -51/10 -N77 : paragraph 70
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -344/10 -N43 : paragraph 29
  • General Court - Judgment T -159/10 : paragraph 73
  • General Court - Judgment T -159/10 -N33 : paragraph 64
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -311/11 -N23 : paragraph 27
  • Court of Justice - Order C -70/13 -N45 : paragraph 71
  • General Court - Judgment T -207/13 -N32 : paragraph 85
  • General Court - Judgment T -695/14 : paragraph 73
  • General Court - Judgment T -290/15 -N66 : paragraph 68
  • General Court - Judgment T -290/15 -N67 : paragraph 68
  • General Court - Judgment T -290/15 -N68 : paragraph 69
  • General Court - Judgment T -290/15 -N69 : paragraph 70
  • General Court - Judgment T -290/15 -N70 : paragraph 71
  • General Court - Judgment T -290/15 -N73 : paragraph 75
  • General Court - Judgment T -678/15 : paragraphs 77, 82
  • General Court - Judgment T -678/15 -N40 : paragraph 44
  • General Court - Judgment T -678/15 -N41 : paragraph 44
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -488/16 -N72 : paragraph 81
  • General Court - Judgment T -81/16 : paragraph 73
  • General Court - Judgment T -81/16 -N19 : paragraph 16
  • General Court - Judgment T -81/16 -N46 : paragraph 28
  • General Court - Judgment T -81/16 -N49 : paragraph 42
  • General Court - Judgment T -81/16 -N50 : paragraph 43
  • General Court - Judgment T -81/16 -N54 : paragraph 36
  • General Court - Judgment T -81/16 -N60 : paragraph 80
  • General Court - Judgment T -130/16 : paragraphs 8, 30, 31, 35
  • General Court - Judgment T -280/16 -N49 : paragraph 86
  • General Court - Judgment T -291/16 : paragraph 73
  • General Court - Judgment T -291/16 -N15 : paragraph 28
  • General Court - Judgment T -291/16 -N29 : paragraph 42
  • General Court - Judgment T -291/16 -N30 : paragraph 43
  • General Court - Judgment T -291/16 -N31 : paragraph 44
  • General Court - Judgment T -291/16 -N41 : paragraph 17
  • General Court - Judgment T -479/16 -N42 : paragraph 75
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -26/17 -N31 : paragraph 27
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -32/17 -N31 : paragraph 85
  • Court of Justice - Judgment C -32/17 -N32 : paragraph 85
  • General Court - Judgment T -25/17 -N92 : paragraph 81
  • General Court - Judgment T -25/17 -N93 : paragraphs 68 - 70
  • General Court - Judgment T -235/17 -N58 : paragraph 81
  • General Court - Judgment T -354/17 -N49 : paragraph 71
  • General Court - Judgment T -387/17 -N15 : paragraph 24
  • General Court - Judgment T -691/17 -N25 : paragraph 29

Operative part

Information not available

Opinion

Information not available


Dates

Date of the lodging of the application initiating proceedings

  • 27/12/2017

Date of the Opinion

Information not available

Date of the hearing

Information not available

Date of delivery

28/03/2019


References

Publication in the Official Journal

Judgment: OJ C 164 from 13.05.2019, p.46

Application: OJ C 63 from 19.02.2018, p.19

Name of the parties

Coesia v EUIPO (Représentation de deux courbes rouges obliques)

Notes on Academic Writings

Information not available



Procedural Analysis Information

Source of the question referred for a preliminary ruling

Information not available

Subject-matter

  • Intellectual, industrial and commercial property
  • - Trade marks

Procedure and result

  • Actions for annulment : dismissal on substantive grounds

Formation of the Court

huitième chambre (Tribunal)

Judge-Rapporteur

De Baere

Advocate General

Information not available

Language(s) of the Case

  • Italian

Language(s) of the Opinion

    Information not available