Judgment of the Court (Fourth Chamber), 3 October 2013
Bernhard Rintisch v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)
Appeal — Community trade mark — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 74(2) — Regulation (EC) No 2868/95 — First and third subparagraphs of Rule 50(1) — Opposition by the proprietor of an earlier trade mark — Existence of the mark — Evidence submitted in support of the opposition after the expiry of the period set for that purpose — Failure to take account thereof — Discretion of the Board of Appeal — Provision to the contrary — Circumstances precluding additional or supplementary evidence from being taken into account
Case C‑121/12 P
Ġabra tal-ġurispridenza
ippubblikat(a) fil-Ġabra diġitali (Ġabra Ġeneral)
Links lejn it-testi
|
Curia |
EUR-Lex |
Autres Liens |
Konklużjonijiet
ECLI:EU:C:2013:312 |
|
|
|
Sentenza
ECLI:EU:C:2013:639 |
|
|
|