News
-
Judgment: C-188/24 WebGroup Czech Republic and NKL Associates and C-190/24 Coyote System
Can a Member State impose restrictions on information society services provided from another Member State, and under what conditions can the operators of these services be held liable for the information they store and circulate? These are the questions examined by the Court of Justice in its judgment in Joined Cases C-188/24 WebGroup Czech Republic and NKL Associates and C-190/24 Coyote System.
-
Hearings: Cases C-358/24 Varo Energy Belgium and Others, C-533/24 Vermilion Energy Ireland and C-153/25 Acea Produzione and Others
On Tuesday 9 June 2026, the Court of Justice will hear Cases C-358/24 Varo Energy Belgium and Others, C-533/24 Vermilion Energy Ireland and C-153/25 Acea Produzione and Others, concerning the temporary solidarity contribution introduced by the EU in response to Europe’s energy crisis.
-
CJEU Annual Press Conference 2026
On Thursday 4 June 2026, the Court of Justice of the European Union hosted its annual press conference in Luxembourg. This year’s theme focused in particular on the rule of law and respect for fundamental rights as key pillars of European integration.
Search Cases
Press releases
-
No. 87/2026 :
Judgment of the Court in Joined Cases C-188/24 WebGroup Czech Republic and NKL Associates and C-190/24 Coyote System
(PDF document, opens in a new tab)Information society services: Member States may require age verification for users of pornographic websites and prohibit the rebroadcasting of information relating to certain roadside checks on their territory
- BG (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- ES (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- CS (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- DA (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- DE (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- ET (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- EL (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- EN (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- FR (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- GA (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- HR (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- IT (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- LV (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- LT (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- HU (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- MT (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- NL (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- PL (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- PT (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- RO (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- SK (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- SL (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- FI (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- SV (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
-
No. 86/2026 :
Opinion of Advocate General in Cases C-631/24 P Commission v Auken and Others and C-632/24 P Commission v Courtois and Others
(PDF document, opens in a new tab)Advocate General Rantos: the Commission did not grant the public sufficiently broad access to agreements for the purchase of Covid-19 vaccines
- BG (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- ES (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- DA (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- DE (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- EL (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- EN (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- FR (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- IT (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- PL (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
-
No. 85/2026 :
Opinion of the Advocate General in Joined Cases C-706/25 and C-707/25 [Comeri and Sidilli]
(PDF document, opens in a new tab)Advocate General Medina: in the exercise of their competence as regards the location of detention facilities, including outside the European Union, Member States remain obliged to observe the guarantees provided for by EU law in asylum matters
- BG (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- ES (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- DE (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- EL (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- EN (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- FR (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- HR (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- IT (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- PL (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
-
No. 84/2026 :
Judgment of the Court in Case C-81/24 [Jenec]
(PDF document, opens in a new tab)Banking services: inclusion on a United States sanctions list is not sufficient, on its own, for a refusal to open an account
- ES (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- DE (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- EN (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- FR (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- IT (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- PL (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- PT (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
- SL (PDF document, opens in a new tab)
-
No. 83/2026 :
Judgments of the General Court in Cases T-1097/23 Vivendi/Commission and T-1119/23 Lagardère/Commission
(PDF document, opens in a new tab)Competition: the Commission may, under certain conditions, require the disclosure of documents stored on personal communication devices used for professional purposes
Focus
Sport
Over the years, the Court of Justice of the European Union has played a pivotal role in shaping the legal landscape of sport. It has ruled on issues including the free movement of athletes, competitio...
Annual Report
The Court of Justice of the European Union publishes two key reports each year: the Year in Review and the Management report. Both reports are available online, offering insights into the year’s leadi...
Yearly Selection of Leading Judgments
The Selection of Leading Judgments is published every year. It contains abstracts of the most important rulings from the Court of Justice and the General Court from the previous year. It is available ...
About the Court of Justice of the EU
The Court of Justice of the European Union is the judicial institution of the European Union.
It is an institution that comprises two courts – the Court of Justice and the General Court.
The Court enforces and interprets EU law. It ensures that the EU’s institutions and Member States respect this law. The Court provides a single interpretation of EU law so that it is applied in the same way throughout the EU.
About the Court of Justice
The Court of Justice is the highest Court of the European Union. Its mission is to ensure that EU law is followed and applied in the same way across the EU.
It is one of the two courts that together make up the institution called the Court of Justice of the European Union.
It has 27 Judges and 11 Advocates General.
It hears several different types of cases. It mostly deals with questions about EU law sent by national courts and cases brought by the Commission against EU Member States for infringing EU law. It also hears appeals against decisions of the General Court.
About the General Court
The General Court is the lower of the two Courts that make up the Court of Justice of the European Union.
It has 54 Judges, 2 from each Member State.
Its main task is to hear all cases brought by individuals, companies and organisations challenging acts or decisions of the EU’s institutions and other bodies. Through these cases, the General Court ensures that EU institutions respect the law.
It is also responsible for answering some questions referred by national courts.
