Judgment of the General Court of 28 April 2014 – Longevity Health Products v OHIM – Weleda Trademark (MENOCHRON)
(Case T-473/11) 1
(Community trade mark – Opposition procedure – Application for Community word mark MENOCHRON – Earlier Community word mark MENODORON – Relative ground for refusal – Likelihood of confusion – Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Longevity Health Products (Nassau, Bahamas) (represented by: J. Korab, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: G. Schneider, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM: Weleda Trademark AG (Arlesheim, Switzerland) (represented by: W. Haring, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 6 July 2010 (Case R 2345/2010-4), relating to an opposition procedure between Weleda Trademark AG and Longevity Health Products, Inc.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
Dismisses the action.
Orders Longevity Health Products, Inc. to pay the costs.
________________________1 OJ C 311, 22.10.2011.